<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org">
<title>Journal of Clinical Oncology Current Issue</title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org</link>
<description>Journal of Clinical Oncology RSS feed -- current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1527-7755</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>Jan 10 2009 12:00:00:000AM</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Clinical Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0732-183X</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/165?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/168?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/170?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/172?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/174?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/176?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/186?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/193?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/199?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/206?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/214?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/220?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/227?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/235?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/242?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/250?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/256?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/264?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/271?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/279?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/289?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/298?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/304?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/307?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/309?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/312?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/313?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/314?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/315?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/316?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/317?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/318?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/319?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/320?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://jco.ascopubs.org/icons/banner/logo.jpg" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/icons/banner/logo.jpg">
<title>Journal of Clinical Oncology</title>
<url>http://jco.ascopubs.org/icons/banner/logo.jpg</url>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/165?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Insulin-Insulin-Like Growth Factor Axis and Colon Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/165?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sridhar, Goodwin]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Translational Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.8937</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Insulin-Insulin-Like Growth Factor Axis and Colon Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>167</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>165</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/168?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Time to Shift the Focus of the War: It Is Not All About the Enemy]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/168?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marshall]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Translational Oncology, Immunology/Immunobiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.0683</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Time to Shift the Focus of the War: It Is Not All About the Enemy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>169</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>168</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/170?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Palliative Care and Oncology: Growing Better Together]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/170?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Byock]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality of Care, Palliative Care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.2671</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Palliative Care and Oncology: Growing Better Together]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>171</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>170</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/172?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] The Drama of the Gifted Disease]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/172?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Woods, LaQuaglia]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Neuroblastoma]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.2153</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] The Drama of the Gifted Disease]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>173</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>172</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/174?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Comments and Controversies] Cautionary Note Regarding the Use of CIs Obtained From Kaplan-Meier Survival Curves]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/174?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carter, Huang]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical Trials]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.18.8011</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Comments and Controversies] Cautionary Note Regarding the Use of CIs Obtained From Kaplan-Meier Survival Curves]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>175</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>174</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Comments and Controversies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/176?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Cancer] Insulin, the Insulin-Like Growth Factor Axis, and Mortality in Patients With Nonmetastatic Colorectal Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/176?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Obesity, sedentary lifestyle, and Western dietary pattern have been linked to increased risk of cancer recurrence and mortality among patients with surgically resected colorectal cancer. Excess energy balance leads to increased circulating insulin and depressed levels of circulating insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP) -1, which promote cancer cell growth in preclinical models.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Among 373 patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer between 1991 and 2004, we performed a prospective observational study nested within two large US cohorts to evaluate the association between mortality and prediagnosis circulating C-peptide (a marker of insulin secretion), IGFBP-1, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), and IGFBP-3.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Compared with patients in the bottom quartile, patients in the top quartile of plasma C-peptide had an age-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for death of 1.87 (95% CI, 1.04 to 3.36; <I>P</I> = .03 for trend), whereas those in the top quartile of circulating IGFBP-1 had a significant reduction in mortality (HR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.84; <I>P</I> = .02 for trend). Little change in these estimates was noted after adjusting for other covariates known or suspected to influence survival. No associations were noted between mortality and IGF-I or IGFBP-3, which are two components of the IGF axis not closely correlated with lifestyle factors.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Among patients with surgically resected colorectal cancer, higher levels of prediagnosis plasma C-peptide and lower levels of prediagnosis plasma IGFBP-1 were associated with increased mortality. Circulating insulin and IGFBP-1 are potential mediators of the association between lifestyle factors and mortality after colorectal cancer resection.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolpin, Meyerhardt, Chan, Ng, Chan, Wu, Pollak, Giovannucci, Fuchs]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiology, Translational Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.9945</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Cancer] Insulin, the Insulin-Like Growth Factor Axis, and Mortality in Patients With Nonmetastatic Colorectal Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>185</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>176</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/186?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Cancer] Tumor-Infiltrating FOXP3+ T Regulatory Cells Show Strong Prognostic Significance in Colorectal Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/186?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>To determine the prognostic significance of FOXP3<SUP>+</SUP> lymphocyte (Treg) density in colorectal cancer compared with conventional histopathologic features and with CD8<SUP>+</SUP> and CD45RO<SUP>+</SUP> lymphocyte densities.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Tissue microarrays and immunohistochemistry were used to assess the densities of CD8<SUP>+</SUP>, CD45RO<SUP>+</SUP>, and FOXP3<SUP>+</SUP> lymphocytes in tumor tissue and normal colonic mucosa from 967 stage II and stage III colorectal cancers. These were evaluated for associations with histopathologic features and patient survival.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>FOXP3<SUP>+</SUP> Treg density was higher in tumor tissue compared with normal colonic mucosa, whereas CD8<SUP>+</SUP> and CD45RO<SUP>+</SUP> cell densities were lower. FOXP3<SUP>+</SUP> Tregs were not associated with any histopathologic features, with the exception of tumor stage. Multivariate analysis showed that stage, vascular invasion, and FOXP3<SUP>+</SUP> Treg density in normal and tumor tissue were independent prognostic indicators, but not CD8<SUP>+</SUP> and CD45RO<SUP>+</SUP>. High FOXP3<SUP>+</SUP> Treg density in normal mucosa was associated with worse prognosis (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.51; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.13; <I>P</I> = .019). In contrast, a high density of FOXP3<SUP>+</SUP> Tregs in tumor tissue was associated with improved survival (HR = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.77; <I>P</I> = .001).</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>FOXP3<SUP>+</SUP> Treg density in normal and tumor tissue had stronger prognostic significance in colorectal cancer compared with CD8<SUP>+</SUP> and CD45RO<SUP>+</SUP> lymphocytes. The finding of improved survival associated with a high density of tumor-infiltrating FOXP3<SUP>+</SUP> Tregs in colorectal cancer contrasts with several other solid cancer types. The inclusion of FOXP3<SUP>+</SUP> Treg density may help to improve the prognostication of early-stage colorectal cancer.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Salama, Phillips, Grieu, Morris, Zeps, Joseph, Platell, Iacopetta]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Translational Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.18.7229</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Cancer] Tumor-Infiltrating FOXP3+ T Regulatory Cells Show Strong Prognostic Significance in Colorectal Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>192</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>186</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/193?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Cancer] Oral mTOR Inhibitor Everolimus in Patients With Gemcitabine-Refractory Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/193?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>The PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is activated in the majority of pancreatic cancers, and inhibition of this pathway has antitumor effects in preclinical studies. We performed a multi-institutional, single-arm, phase II study of RAD001(everolimus), an oral inhibitor of mTOR, in patients who experienced treatment failure on first-line therapy with gemcitabine.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Thirty-three patients with gemcitabine-refractory, metastatic pancreatic cancer were treated continuously with RAD001 at 10 mg daily. Prior treatment with fluorouracil in the perioperative setting was allowed. Patients were observed for toxicity, treatment response, and survival.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Treatment with single-agent RAD001 was well-tolerated; the most common adverse events were mild hyperglycemia and thrombocytopenia. No patients were removed from the study because of drug-related adverse events. No complete or partial treatment responses were noted, and only seven patients (21%) had stable disease at the first restaging scans performed at 2 months. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 1.8 months and 4.5 months, respectively. One patient (3%) had a biochemical response, defined as &ge; 50% reduction in serum CA19-9.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Although well-tolerated, RAD001 administered as a single-agent had minimal clinical activity in patients with gemcitabine-refractory, metastatic pancreatic cancer. Future studies in metastatic pancreatic cancer should assess the combination of mTOR inhibitors with other agents and/or examine inhibitors of other components of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolpin, Hezel, Abrams, Blaszkowsky, Meyerhardt, Chan, Enzinger, Allen, Clark, Ryan, Fuchs]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical Trials, Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.18.9514</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Cancer] Oral mTOR Inhibitor Everolimus in Patients With Gemcitabine-Refractory Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>198</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>193</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/199?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Cancer] Addition of Bevacizumab to Fluorouracil-Based First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Pooled Analysis of Cohorts of Older Patients From Two Randomized Clinical Trials]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/199?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Colorectal cancer (CRC) occurs predominantly in older persons. To provide more statistical power to assess risk/benefit in older patients, we examined the clinical benefit of bevacizumab (BV) plus fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in first-line metastatic CRC (mCRC) treatment in patients aged &ge; 65 years, using data pooled from two placebo-controlled studies.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Pooled efficacy data for 439 patients &ge; 65 years old randomized to BV plus chemotherapy (n = 218) or placebo plus chemotherapy (n = 221) in study 1 and study 2 were retrospectively analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response. Safety analysis was based on reports of targeted adverse events in treated patients.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Median OS with BV plus chemotherapy was 19.3 <I>v</I> 14.3 months with placebo plus chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.90; <I>P</I> = .006). Patients treated with BV plus chemotherapy had a median PFS of 9.2 <I>v</I> 6.2 months for placebo plus chemotherapy patients (HR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.67; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001). The objective response rate was 34.4% with BV plus chemotherapy versus 29.0% with placebo plus chemotherapy (difference not statistically significant). Rates of BV-associated adverse events in the pooled BV plus chemotherapy group were consistent with those reported in the overall populations for the two studies.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Analysis of pooled patient cohorts age &ge; 65 years from two similar trials in mCRC indicates that adding bevacizumab to fluorouracil-based chemotherapy improved OS and PFS, similar to the benefits in younger patients. Also, the risks of treatment do not seem to exceed those in younger patients with mCRC.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kabbinavar, Hurwitz, Yi, Sarkar, Rosen]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Combined Modality]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.7931</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Cancer] Addition of Bevacizumab to Fluorouracil-Based First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Pooled Analysis of Cohorts of Older Patients From Two Randomized Clinical Trials]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>205</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>199</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/206?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Palliative and Supportive Care] Phase II Study of an Outpatient Palliative Care Intervention in Patients With Metastatic Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/206?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Although there is increasing advocacy for timely symptom control in patients with cancer, few studies have assessed outpatient palliative care clinics. This study assessed prospectively the efficacy of an Oncology Palliative Care Clinic (OPCC) in improving patient symptom distress and satisfaction.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Eligible patients were new referrals to an OPCC, had metastatic cancer, were at least 18 years old, and were well enough and able to speak and read English sufficiently to provide informed consent and complete questionnaires. Patients received a consultation by a palliative care team. The primary end points of symptom control and patient satisfaction were assessed using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and patient-adapted Family Satisfaction with Advanced Cancer Care (FAMCARE) scale at baseline, 1 week, and 1 month. Initial and follow-up scores were compared using paired <I>t</I> tests.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Of 150 patients enrolled, 123 completed 1-week assessments, and 88 completed 4-week assessments. At baseline, the mean ESAS Distress Score (EDS) was 39.5. The mean improvement in EDS was 8.8 points (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001) at 1 week and 7.0 points (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001) at 1 month. Statistically significant improvements were observed for pain, fatigue, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, dyspnea, insomnia, and constipation at 1 week (all <I>P</I> &le; .005) and 1 month (all <I>P</I> &le; .05). The mean improvement in FAMCARE score was 6.1 points (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001) at 1 week and 5.0 points (<I>P</I> &lt; .0001) at 1 month.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>This phase II study demonstrates efficacy of an OPCC for improvement of symptom control and patient satisfaction with care. Randomized controlled trials are indicated to further evaluate the effectiveness of specialized outpatient palliative care.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Follwell, Burman, Le, Wakimoto, Seccareccia, Bryson, Rodin, Zimmermann]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Palliative Care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.7568</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Palliative and Supportive Care] Phase II Study of an Outpatient Palliative Care Intervention in Patients With Metastatic Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>213</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>206</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Palliative and Supportive Care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/214?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Breast Cancer] Sensitivity to Input Variability of the Adjuvant! Online Breast Cancer Prognostic Model]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/214?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Adjuvant! Online (<INTER-REF LOCATOR="www.adjuvantonline.org" LOCATOR-TYPE="URL">www.adjuvantonline.org</INTER-REF>) is a software model that predicts the benefit of adjuvant therapy for women with early-stage breast cancer. The model has been validated, is widely consulted, and has been shown to influence patient choices in the clinical setting. Adjuvant! requires the clinician to input patient age, tumor size, grade, hormone receptor status, number of positive lymph nodes, and comorbidity level. Because comorbidity is strongly and independently associated with survival, this study tested the hypothesis that Adjuvant! predictions would be sensitive to comorbidity inputs.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Methods</ST> 
<P>Investigators used single-variable deterministic sensitivity analysis to evaluate the effect of varying each input of the model independently for three representative case examples based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines (NCCN). The main outcome of interest was 10-year mortality prediction.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>The analyses show that Adjuvant!'s 10-year mortality predictions are most sensitive to patients&rsquo; comorbidity levels and the extent of nodal involvement for the cases, particularly among older women. Comorbidity was the most influential input except in younger women, aged 40 years.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>The Adjuvant! model is sensitive to patient comorbidity, and impact on the model outputs are significant enough that they are likely to affect physician recommendations and patients&rsquo; treatment choices. For example, incorrect assessments of comorbidities could lead physicians to overtreat or undertreat a patient who is in a gray zone relative to the NCCN guidelines. These results point to the importance of accurately assessing comorbidities in patients with breast cancer when using Adjuvant! and highlight the need for a standardized process of comorbidity ascertainment.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ozanne, Braithwaite, Sepucha, Moore, Esserman, Belkora]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiology, Combined Modality]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.3914</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Breast Cancer] Sensitivity to Input Variability of the Adjuvant! Online Breast Cancer Prognostic Model]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>219</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>214</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/220?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Breast Cancer] Triple Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer: The Effect of Race on Response to Primary Systemic Treatment and Survival Outcomes]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/220?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>The goal of this study was to describe the effect of race on pathologic complete response (pCR) rates and survival outcomes in women with triple receptor&ndash;negative (TN) breast cancers.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Four hundred seventy-one patients with TN breast cancer diagnosed between 1996 and 2005 and treated with primary systemic chemotherapy were included. pCR was defined as no residual invasive cancer in the breast and axillary lymph nodes. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method and compared between groups using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted for each survival outcome to determine the relationship of patient and tumor variables with outcome.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Median follow-up time was 24.5 months. One hundred patients (21.2%) were black, and 371 patients (78.8%) were white/other race. Seventeen percent of black patients (n = 17) and 25.1% of white/other patients (n = 93) achieved a pCR (<I>P</I> = .091). Three-year RFS rates were 68% (95% CI, 56% to 76%) and 62% (95% CI, 57% to 67%) for black and white/other patients, respectively, with no significant difference observed between the two groups (<I>P</I> = .302). Three-year OS was similar for the two racial groups. After controlling for patient and tumor characteristics, race was not significantly associated with RFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.68; <I>P</I> = .747) or OS (HR = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.68; <I>P</I> = .735) when white/other patients were compared with black patients.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Race does not significantly affect pCR rates or survival outcomes in women with TN breast cancer treated in a single institution under the same treatment conditions.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dawood, Broglio, Kau, Green, Giordano, Meric-Bernstam, Buchholz, Albarracin, Yang, Hennessy, Hortobagyi, Gonzalez-Angulo]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.9952</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Breast Cancer] Triple Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer: The Effect of Race on Response to Primary Systemic Treatment and Survival Outcomes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>226</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>220</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/227?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Breast Cancer] Phosphorylated ER{alpha}, HIF-1{alpha}, and MAPK Signaling As Predictors of Primary Endocrine Treatment Response and Resistance in Patients With Breast Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/227?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>We aimed to identify signaling pathways involved in the response and resistance to aromatase inhibitor therapy in patients with breast cancer.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>One hundred fourteen women with T2-4 N0-1, estrogen receptor (ER) &ndash;positive tumors were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant letrozole or letrozole plus metronomic cyclophosphamide. Twenty-four tumor proteins involved in apoptosis, cell survival, hypoxia, angiogenesis, growth factor, and hormone signaling were assessed by immunohistochemistry in pretreatment samples (eg, caspase 3, phospho- mammalian target of rapamycin, hypoxia-inducible factor 1 [HIF-1], vascular endothelial growth factor, mitogen-activated protein kinase [MAPK], phosphorylated epidermal growth factor receptor, phosphorylated ER [pER]). A multivariate generalized linear regression approach was applied using a penalized least-square minimization to perform variable selection and regularization. Ten-fold cross-validation and iterative leave-one-out were employed to validate and test the model, respectively. Tumor size, nodal status, age, tumor grade, histological type, and treatment were included in the analysis.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Ninety-one patients (81%) attained a disease response, 48 achieved a complete clinical response (43%) whereas 22 did not respond (19%). Increased pER and decreased p44/42 MAPK were significant factors for complete response to treatment in all leave-one-out iterations. Increased p44/42 MAPK and HIF-1 were significant factors for treatment resistance in all leave-one-out iterations. There was no significant interaction between these variables and treatment.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Activated ER form was an independent factor for sensitivity to chemoendocrine treatment, whereas HIF-1 and p44/42 MAPK were independent factors for resistance. Although further confirmatory analyses are needed, these findings have clear potential implications for future strategies in the management of clinical trials with aromatase inhibitors in the breast cancer.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Generali, Buffa, Berruti, Brizzi, Campo, Bonardi, Bersiga, Allevi, Milani, Aguggini, Papotti, Dogliotti, Bottini, Harris, Fox]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Combined Modality, Translational Oncology, Protein Profiling, Breast Cancer, Cancer Biomarkers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.13.7083</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Breast Cancer] Phosphorylated ER{alpha}, HIF-1{alpha}, and MAPK Signaling As Predictors of Primary Endocrine Treatment Response and Resistance in Patients With Breast Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>234</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>227</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/235?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Cancer] Metastatic Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Targeted Therapy]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/235?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with sarcomatoid differentiation is an aggressive disease that is associated with poor outcomes to chemotherapy or immunotherapy. The utility of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)&ndash;targeted therapy in patients with this disease is unknown.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Patients who had mRCC with sarcomatoid features in the primary tumor and who were treated with VEGF-targeted therapy were retrospectively identified. Pathology slides were reviewed to determine the percentage of sarcomatoid differentiation. Objective response rate, percentage of tumor burden shrinkage, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were determined.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Forty-three patients who had sarcomatoid mRCC were identified. The median percentage of sarcomatoid features was 14% (range, 3% to 90%). Patients were treated with either sunitinib (49%), sorafenib (28%), bevacizumab (19%), or sunitinib plus bevacizumab (5%). Partial responses were observed in eight patients (19%); 21 patients (49%) had stable disease; and 14 patients (33%) had progressive disease as their best response. Partial responses were limited to patients who had underlying clear-cell histology and less than 20% sarcomatoid elements. Median tumor shrinkage was &ndash;2% (range, &ndash;85% to 127%), and 53% achieved some degree of tumor shrinkage on therapy. Median PFS and OS were estimated to be 5.3 months and 11.8 months, respectively.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Patients who have mRCC and sarcomatoid differentiation can demonstrate objective responses and tumor shrinkage to VEGF-targeted therapy. Patients who have clear-cell histology and a lower percentage of sarcomatoid differentiation may have better outcomes with VEGF-targeted therapy.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Golshayan, George, Heng, Elson, Wood, Mekhail, Garcia, Aydin, Zhou, Bukowski, Rini]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.18.0000</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Cancer] Metastatic Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Targeted Therapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>241</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>235</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/242?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Head and Neck Cancer] Randomized Phase II Trial of Concurrent Cisplatin-Radiotherapy With or Without Neoadjuvant Docetaxel and Cisplatin in Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/242?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>To compare the toxicities, tumor control, survival, and quality of life of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients treated with sequential neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent cisplatin-radiotherapy (CRT) or CRT alone.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Previously untreated stage III to IVB NPC were randomly assigned to (1) neoadjuvant docetaxel 75 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> and cisplatin 75 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP> every 3 weeks for two cycles, followed by cisplatin 40 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>/wk concurrent with radiotherapy, or (2) CRT alone. Planned accrual was 30 patients per arm to detect 20% difference of toxicities based on 95% CIs.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>From November 2002 to November 2004, 65 eligible patients were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by CRT (n = 34) or CRT alone (n = 31). There was a high rate of grade 3/4 neutropenia (97%) but not neutropenic fever (12%) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. No significant differences in rates of acute toxicities were observed between the two arms during CRT. Dose intensities of concurrent cisplatin, late RT toxicities and quality of life scores were comparable in both arms. The 3-year progression-free survival for neoadjuvant versus control arm was 88.2% and 59.5% (hazard ratio = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.20 to 1.19; <I>P</I> = .12). The 3-year overall survival for neoadjuvant versus control arm was 94.1% and 67.7% (hazard ratio = 0.24; 95% CI, 0.078 to 0.73; <I>P</I> = .012).</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Neoadjuvant docetaxel-cisplatin followed by CRT was well tolerated with a manageable toxicity profile that allowed subsequent delivery of full-dose CRT. Preliminary results suggested a positive impact on survival. A phase III study to definitively test this neoadjuvant-concurrent strategy is warranted.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hui, Ma, Leung, King, Mo, Kam, Yu, Chiu, Kwan, Ho, Chan, Ahuja, Zee, Chan]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy, Combined Modality]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.18.1545</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Head and Neck Cancer] Randomized Phase II Trial of Concurrent Cisplatin-Radiotherapy With or Without Neoadjuvant Docetaxel and Cisplatin in Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>249</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>242</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Head and Neck Cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/250?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Leukemia and Bone Marrow Transplantation] Increased Incidence of Transformation and Myelodysplasia/Acute Leukemia in Patients With Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia Treated With Nucleoside Analogs]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/250?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Nucleoside analogs (NAs) are considered as appropriate agents in the treatment of Waldenstr&ouml;m macroglobulinemia (WM), a lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. Sporadic reports on increased incidence of transformation to high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and development of therapy-related myelodysplasia/acute leukemia (t-MDS/AML) among patients with WM treated with NAs prompted us to examine the incidence of such events in a large population of patients with WM.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>We examined the incidence of these events in 439 patients with WM, 193 and 136 of whom were previously treated with and without an NA, respectively, and 110 of whom had similar long-term follow-up without treatment. The median follow-up for all patients was 5 years.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Overall, 12 patients (6.2%) either developed transformation (n = 9; 4.7%) or developed t-MDS/AML (n = 3; 1.6%) among NA-treated patients, compared with one patient (0.4%) who developed transformation in the non-NA treated group (<I>P</I> &lt; .001); no such events occurred among untreated patients. Transformation and t-MDS/AML occurred at a median of 5 years from onset of NA therapy. The median survival of NA-treated patients who developed transformation did not differ from other NA-treated patients as a result of effective salvage treatment used for transformed disease. However, all NA-treated patients who developed t-MDS/AML died at a median of 5 months.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>These data demonstrate an increased incidence of disease transformation to high-grade NHL and the development of t-MDS/AML among patients with WM treated with NAs.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leleu, Soumerai, Roccaro, Hatjiharissi, Hunter, Manning, Ciccarelli, Sacco, Ioakimidis, Adamia, Moreau, Patterson, Ghobrial, Treon]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Translational Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.1530</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Leukemia and Bone Marrow Transplantation] Increased Incidence of Transformation and Myelodysplasia/Acute Leukemia in Patients With Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia Treated With Nucleoside Analogs]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>255</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>250</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Leukemia and Bone Marrow Transplantation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/256?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Leukemia and Bone Marrow Transplantation] Analysis of Risk Factors for Outcomes After Unrelated Cord Blood Transplantation in Adults With Lymphoid Malignancies: A Study by the Eurocord-Netcord and Lymphoma Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/256?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>To determine risk factors of umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) for patients with lymphoid malignancies.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>We evaluated 104 adult patients (median age, 41 years) who underwent unrelated donor UCBT for lymphoid malignancies. UCB grafts were two-antigen human leukocyte antigen&ndash;mismatched in 68%, and were composed of one (n = 78) or two (n = 26) units. Diagnoses were non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL, n = 61), Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL, n = 29), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL, n = 14), with 87% having advanced disease and 60% having experienced failure with a prior autologous transplant. Sixty-four percent of patients received a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen and 46% low-dose total-body irradiation (TBI). Median follow-up was 18 months.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment was 84% by day 60, with greater engraftment in recipients of higher CD34<SUP>+</SUP> kg/cell dose (<I>P</I> = .0004). CI of non&ndash;relapse-related mortality (NRM) was 28% at 1 year, with a lower risk in patients treated with low-dose total-body irradiation (TBI; <I>P</I> = .03). Cumulative incidence of relapse or progression was 31% at 1 year, with a lower risk in recipients of double-unit UCBT (<I>P</I> = .03). The probability of progression-free survival (PFS) was 40% at 1 year, with improved survival in those with chemosensitive disease (49% <I>v</I> 34%; <I>P</I> = .03), who received conditioning regimens containing low-dose TBI (60% <I>v</I> 23%; <I>P</I> = .001), and higher nucleated cell dose (49% <I>v</I> 21%; <I>P</I> = .009).</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>UCBT is a viable treatment for adults with advanced lymphoid malignancies. Chemosensitive disease, use of low-dose TBI, and higher cell dose were factors associated with significantly better outcome.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodrigues, Sanz, Brunstein, Sanz, Wagner, Renaud, de Lima, Cairo, Furst, Rio, Dalley, Carreras, Harousseau, Mohty, Taveira, Dreger, Sureda, Gluckman, Rocha]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lymphoma]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.8865</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Leukemia and Bone Marrow Transplantation] Analysis of Risk Factors for Outcomes After Unrelated Cord Blood Transplantation in Adults With Lymphoid Malignancies: A Study by the Eurocord-Netcord and Lymphoma Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>263</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>256</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Leukemia and Bone Marrow Transplantation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/264?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Thoracic Oncology] Randomized Phase II Study of Pulse Erlotinib Before or After Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in Current or Former Smokers With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/264?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>A prior study demonstrated that addition of continuous daily erlotinib fails to improve response rate or survival in non&ndash;small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel. However, preclinical data support the hypothesis that intermittent administration of erlotinib before or after chemotherapy may improve efficacy. We tested this hypothesis in patients with advanced NSCLC.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Eligible patients were former or current smokers with chemotherapy-naive stage IIIB or IV NSCLC. All patients received up to six cycles of carboplatin (area under the curve = 6) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m<SUP>2</SUP>), with random assignment to one of the following three erlotinib treatments: erlotinib 150 mg on days 1 and 2 with chemotherapy on day 3 (150 PRE); erlotinib 1,500 mg on days 1 and 2 with chemotherapy on day 3 (1,500 PRE); or chemotherapy on day 1 with erlotinib 1,500 mg on days 2 and 3 (1,500 POST). The primary end point was response rate.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Eighty-six patients received treatment. The response rates for the 150 PRE, 1,500 PRE, and 1,500 POST arms were 18% (five of 28 patients), 34% (10 of 29 patients), and 28% (eight of 29 patients), respectively. The median overall survival times were 10, 15, and 10 months for the 150 PRE, 1,500 PRE, and 1,500 POST arms, respectively. The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were neutropenia (39%), fatigue (15%), and anemia (12%). Grade 3 and 4 rash and diarrhea were uncommon.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Patients treated on the 1,500 PRE arm had the highest response rate and longest survival, with ranges similar to those reported for carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab in a more restricted population. Further evaluation of this strategy in a phase III trial is proposed.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Riely, Rizvi, Kris, Milton, Solit, Rosen, Senturk, Azzoli, Brahmer, Sirotnak, Seshan, Fogle, Ginsberg, Miller, Rudin]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chemotherapy, Chemotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.4656</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Thoracic Oncology] Randomized Phase II Study of Pulse Erlotinib Before or After Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in Current or Former Smokers With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>270</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>264</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/271?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Thoracic Oncology] Thyroid Transcription Factor 1 Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Patients With Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/271?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF1) is a transcription factor that regulates the expression of multiple genes involved in lung development. It is preferentially expressed in adenocarcinomas of the lung and has been investigated as a potential prognostic parameter in patients with lung cancer, with conflicting results. We quantitatively assessed TTF1 protein expression in two large and independent data sets to investigate the impact of TTF1 nuclear expression on patient survival.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>Automated quantitative analysis, a fluorescent-based method for analysis of in situ protein expression, was used to assess a series of cell lines to find the threshold of detection of TTF1 expression. Then two independent cohorts (176 and 237 cases, respectively) were measured by the same technique, and TTF1 expression was correlated with survival.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Tumors expressed TTF1 in 45% and 58% of the cases in each cohort. TTF1 was consistently expressed in adenocarcinomas (n = 61 and 73; Spearman  = 0.313 and 0.4 for the first and second set, respectively; <I>P</I> &lt; .0001) independent of their differentiation and stage. Survival analysis showed that patients with stage I adenocarcinoma with TTF1 expression had a longer median overall survival than those without expression (n = 43, 44.3 <I>v</I> 26.2 months, <I>P</I> = .05 for the first cohort; n = 87; 49.7 <I>v</I> 38.5 months, <I>P</I> = .03 for the second cohort) Multivariate analysis revealed an independent lower risk of death for patients with stage I adenocarcinoma with TTF1-expressing tumors (hazard ratio = 0.479, 95% CI, 0.235 to 0.977; <I>P</I> = .043).</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>TTF1 expression defines a subgroup of patients with a favorable outcome and may be useful for prognostic stratification of patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anagnostou, Syrigos, Bepler, Homer, Rimm]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Staging, Pathology, Cancer Biomarkers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.0043</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Thoracic Oncology] Thyroid Transcription Factor 1 Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Patients With Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>278</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>271</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Thoracic Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/279?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Review Article] Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: State of the Science and Roadmap to Advance the Field]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/279?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is the fourth leading cancer for women in the United States. Understanding of the biology and clinical behavior of DCIS is imperfect. This article highlights the current knowledge base and the scientific roadmap needed to advance the field.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Methods</ST> 
<P>This article is based on work done by and consultations obtained from leading experts in the field over a 6-month period that culminated in a full-day symposium designed to systematically review the most pertinent MEDLINE published reports and develop a roadmap to elucidate the molecular steps of carcinogenesis, reduce the extent or prevent the need for therapies, eliminate recurrences, and reduce morbidity.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Expression profiling of pure DCIS will help elucidate the molecular characteristics that distinguish high-risk lesions from clinically irrelevant lesions. The development of new methods of extracting RNA from processed tissues may provide opportunities for research. Mammography often underestimates the pathologic extent of DCIS; other imaging methods need to be investigated for detection and monitoring of disease stability or progression. Novel biologic agents are being delivered in neoadjuvant clinical trials, and alternative methods for breast irradiation are being studied. Future trials of treatment versus no treatment for biologically selected cases of DCIS should be developed.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>There is a critical need for a concerted international effort among patients with DCIS, clinicians, and basic scientists to conduct the research necessary to improve fundamental understanding of the biology and clinical behavior of DCIS and prevent development of invasive breast cancer.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kuerer, Albarracin, Yang, Cardiff, Brewster, Symmans, Hylton, Middleton, Krishnamurthy, Perkins, Babiera, Edgerton, Czerniecki, Arun, Hortobagyi]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiology, Diagnosis & Staging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.18.3103</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Review Article] Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: State of the Science and Roadmap to Advance the Field]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>288</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>279</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/289?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Special Articles] The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Classification System: An INRG Task Force Report]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/289?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>Because current approaches to risk classification and treatment stratification for children with neuroblastoma (NB) vary greatly throughout the world, it is difficult to directly compare risk-based clinical trials. The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system was developed to establish a consensus approach for pretreatment risk stratification.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Patients and Methods</ST> 
<P>The statistical and clinical significance of 13 potential prognostic factors were analyzed in a cohort of 8,800 children diagnosed with NB between 1990 and 2002 from North America and Australia (Children's Oncology Group), Europe (International Society of Pediatric Oncology Europe Neuroblastoma Group and German Pediatric Oncology and Hematology Group), and Japan. Survival tree regression analyses using event-free survival (EFS) as the primary end point were performed to test the prognostic significance of the 13 factors.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>Stage, age, histologic category, grade of tumor differentiation, the status of the <I>MYCN</I> oncogene, chromosome 11q status, and DNA ploidy were the most highly statistically significant and clinically relevant factors. A new staging system (INRG Staging System) based on clinical criteria and tumor imaging was developed for the INRG Classification System. The optimal age cutoff was determined to be between 15 and 19 months, and 18 months was selected for the classification system. Sixteen pretreatment groups were defined on the basis of clinical criteria and statistically significantly different EFS of the cohort stratified by the INRG criteria. Patients with 5-year EFS more than 85%, more than 75% to &le; 85%, &ge; 50% to &le; 75%, or less than 50% were classified as very low risk, low risk, intermediate risk, or high risk, respectively.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>By defining homogenous pretreatment patient cohorts, the INRG classification system will greatly facilitate the comparison of risk-based clinical trials conducted in different regions of the world and the development of international collaborative studies.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cohn, Pearson, London, Monclair, Ambros, Brodeur, Faldum, Hero, Iehara, Machin, Mosseri, Simon, Garaventa, Castel, Matthay]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Neuroblastoma]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6785</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Special Articles] The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Classification System: An INRG Task Force Report]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>297</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>289</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/298?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Special Articles] The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Staging System: An INRG Task Force Report]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/298?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<SEC> 
<ST>Purpose</ST> 
<P>The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system was developed to establish a consensus approach for pretreatment risk stratification. Because the International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) is a postsurgical staging system, a new clinical staging system was required for the INRG pretreatment risk classification system.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Methods</ST> 
<P>To stage patients before any treatment, the INRG Task Force, consisting of neuroblastoma experts from Australia/New Zealand, China, Europe, Japan, and North America, developed a new INRG staging system (INRGSS) based on clinical criteria and image-defined risk factors (IDRFs). To investigate the impact of IDRFs on outcome, survival analyses were performed on 661 European patients with INSS stages 1, 2, or 3 disease for whom IDRFs were known.</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Results</ST> 
<P>In the INGRSS, locoregional tumors are staged L1 or L2 based on the absence or presence of one or more of 20 IDRFs, respectively. Metastatic tumors are defined as stage M, except for stage MS, in which metastases are confined to the skin, liver, and/or bone marrow in children younger than 18 months of age. Within the 661-patient cohort, IDRFs were present (ie, stage L2) in 21% of patients with stage 1, 45% of patients with stage 2, and 94% of patients with stage 3 disease. Patients with INRGSS stage L2 disease had significantly lower 5-year event-free survival than those with INRGSS stage L1 disease (78% &plusmn; 4% <I>v</I> 90% &plusmn; 3%; <I>P</I> = .0010).</P>
</SEC>
 
<SEC> 
<ST>Conclusion</ST> 
<P>Use of the new staging (INRGSS) and risk classification (INRG) of neuroblastoma will greatly facilitate the comparison of risk-based clinical trials conducted in different regions of the world.</P>
</SEC>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monclair, Brodeur, Ambros, Brisse, Cecchetto, Holmes, Kaneko, London, Matthay, Nuchtern, von Schweinitz, Simon, Cohn, Pearson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Neuroblastoma]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6876</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Special Articles] The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Staging System: An INRG Task Force Report]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>303</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>298</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/304?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Art of Oncology] The Role of Investigational Therapy in Management of Patients With Advanced Metastatic Malignancy]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/304?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Freireich, Kurzrock]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life issues, Hospice and symptom control]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.6543</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Art of Oncology] The Role of Investigational Therapy in Management of Patients With Advanced Metastatic Malignancy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>306</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>304</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Art of Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/307?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Art of Oncology] Phase I Versus Palliative Care: Striking the Right Balance]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/307?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schapira, Moynihan, von Gunten, Smith]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life issues, Hospice and symptom control]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.7803</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Art of Oncology] Phase I Versus Palliative Care: Striking the Right Balance]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>308</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>307</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Art of Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/309?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Diagnosis in Oncology] Cutaneous Paraneoplastic Syndrome in a Patient With Adenocarcinoma of Unknown Primary Site Syndrome]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/309?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yoo, Rho, Kim, Li, Seo, Hong]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Unknown Primary Site and Rare Cancers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.6758</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Diagnosis in Oncology] Cutaneous Paraneoplastic Syndrome in a Patient With Adenocarcinoma of Unknown Primary Site Syndrome]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>311</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>309</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Diagnosis in Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/312?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Small Molecule Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor and Depression]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/312?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quek, Morgan, George, Butrynski, Polson, Meyer, Demetri, Block]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.7236</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Small Molecule Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor and Depression]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>313</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>312</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/313?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cells: Now on the Run]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/313?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goldman]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.2260</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cells: Now on the Run]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>314</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>313</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/314?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] How Should We Prescribe Lapatinib to Our Patients: Once Daily or Twice Daily, and at What Dose?]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/314?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ciccarese, Lorusso]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.0345</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] How Should We Prescribe Lapatinib to Our Patients: Once Daily or Twice Daily, and at What Dose?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>315</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>314</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/315?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/315?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Castaneda, Gomez]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.0741</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>316</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>315</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/316?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/316?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[LoRusso, Burris, Jones, Fleming, Koch]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.0758</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>317</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>316</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/317?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Prevention of Hearing Loss in Children Receiving Cisplatin Chemotherapy]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/317?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Freyer, Sung, Reaman]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.1160</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Prevention of Hearing Loss in Children Receiving Cisplatin Chemotherapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>318</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>317</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/318?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/318?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fouladi, Gajjar]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.1632</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>319</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>318</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/319?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Activity of Sunitinib in Patients With Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/319?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bajetta, Guadalupi, Procopio]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.3034</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Activity of Sunitinib in Patients With Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>320</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>319</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/320?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></title>
<link>http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/27/2/320?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kulke, Fuchs]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.3240</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] In Reply]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Society of Clinical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>320</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>320</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>