Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 13 (May 1), 2005: pp. 3155
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.137

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Legha, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Legha, S. S.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Reply

CORRESPONDENCE

Treatment of Brain Metastases From Melanoma

Sewa S. Legha

St Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, TX

To the Editor:

Agarwala et al1 have recently reported the results of a phase II study of temozolomide in melanoma brain metastases. The authors report a modest response rate of 6% among 151 patients, and an additional 26% of patients were reported to have experienced stable disease.

I would like to point out some relevant details which are left out of this report. For instance it would be useful to describe the quality of temozolomide-induced responses observed by the authors, ie, the duration of objective responses (complete responses + partial responses) as well as the length of stable disease category of responses. This is an essential piece of data, which must be reported in order for the readers to better assess the value of this drug to their patients

In addition, the authors have made remarks indicating that temozolomide has more promising activity in melanoma brain metastases than any other chemotherapeutic agent. However, they fail to mention much higher response rates (20% to 25% compared with 6%) observed with fotemustine therapy as reported in multiple European trials.2-5 To provide a balanced view of the current literature on this subject, the authors should place temozolomide in the proper perspective.

Author's Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The following author or their immediate family members have indicated a financial interest. No conflict exists for drugs or devices used in a study if they are not being evaluated as part of the investigation. Consultant: Sewa S. Legha, Schering Plough Oncology. Honoraria: Sewa S. Legha, Schering Plough Oncology. For a detailed description of these categories, or for more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to the Author Disclosure Declaration and the Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest' section of Information for Contributors found in the front of every issue.

REFERENCES

1. Agarwala SS, Kirkwood JM, Gore M, et al: Temozolomide for the treatment of brain metastases associated with metastatic melanoma: A phase II study. J Clin Oncol 22:2101-2107, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Jacquillat C, Khayat D, Banzet P, et al: Final report of the French multicenter phase II study of the nitrosourea totemustine in 153 evaluable patients with disseminated malignant melanoma including patients with cerebral metastases. Cancer 66:1873-1878, 1990[CrossRef][Medline]

3. Jacquillat C, Khayat D, Banzet P, et al: Chemotherapy by fotemustine in cerebral metastases of disseminated malignant melanoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 25:263-266, 1990[CrossRef][Medline]

4. Merimsky O, Inbar M, Reider-Groswasser I, et al: Fotemustine with or without dacarbazine for brain metastases of malignant melanoma. Eur J Cancer 27:1066, 1991

5. Khayat D, Giroux B, Berille J, et al: Fotemustine in the treatment of brain primary tumors and metastases. Cancer Investigation 12:414-420, 1994[Medline]


Related Reply

  • In Reply:
    Sanjiv S. Agarwala
    JCO 2005 23: 3155-3156 [Full Text]



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Legha, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Legha, S. S.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Reply

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online