Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 22, No 13 (July 1), 2004: pp. 2755
© 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.99.299

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pfeffer, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Aderka, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pfeffer, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Aderka, D.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Reply
Right arrowRelated Article

CORRESPONDENCE

Gefitinib in Recurrent Glioblastoma

M. Raphael Pfeffer, Mark L. Levitt, Dan Aderka

Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel

To the Editor:

We received the American Society of Clinical Oncology e-mail alert referring to the early release of a paper by Rich et al1 on the use of gefitinib (Iressa; AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE) for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme with great excitement, because this is a group of patients for whom no effective therapy currently exists. Our interest was further spiked by the conclusion of the abstract, which states that gefitinib has activity in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. The results presented do not justify this conclusion.

The paper states that the primary end point of the study was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS), and the study was designed to differentiate between a 6-month PFS rate of 15% and 30% with type I and type II error rates of 0.091. In fact, none of the patients on the study responded to therapy, and the actual PFS was 13.2%. The authors noted that this is better than the results from a phase II randomized study where another ineffective agent (procarbazine) was compared with temozolamide, and had a 6-month PFS of 8%. The authors carried out subgroup analyses of this phase II study and showed that the most significant factor for event-free survival was extent of surgical resection. Historical controls in studies of glioblastoma multiforme are problematic because of the effect of new surgical techniques, including navigation and intraoperative mapping, which have increased the neurosurgeon's ability to resect recurrent tumors.

The abstract's conclusion that gefitinib has activity in glioblastoma multiforme is likely to cause unjustified demand for this drug from patients and their advocates, who are not capable of analyzing the actual results of the study, particularly when the American Society of Clinical Oncology considers the paper to be important enough to warrant early publication and an e-mail alert.

Authors' Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

REFERENCE

1. Rich JN, Reardon DA, Peery T, et al: Phase II trial of gefitinib in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 22:133-142, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Related Reply

  • In Reply:
    Jeremy N. Rich, Henry S. Friedman, James B. Powell, Jr, and Janet E. Dancey
    JCO 2004 22: 2755-2756 [Full Text]

Related Article

  • Phase II Trial of Gefitinib in Recurrent Glioblastoma
    Jeremy N. Rich, David A. Reardon, Terry Peery, Jeannette M. Dowell, Jennifer A. Quinn, Kara L. Penne, Carol J. Wikstrand, Lauren B. Van Duyn, Janet E. Dancey, Roger E. McLendon, James C. Kao, Timothy T. Stenzel, B.K. Ahmed Rasheed, Sandra E. Tourt-Uhlig, James E. Herndon, II, James J. Vredenburgh, John H. Sampson, Allan H. Friedman, Darell D. Bigner, and Henry S. Friedman
    JCO 2004 22: 133-142 [Abstract] [Full Text]



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pfeffer, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Aderka, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pfeffer, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Aderka, D.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Reply
Right arrowRelated Article

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online