Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sasako, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sasako, M.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 21, No 23S (December 1 Supplement), 2003: 274s-275s
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Oncology


2003 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM

Principles of Surgical Treatment for Curable Gastric Cancer

Mitsuru Sasako

From the Department of Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Address reprint requests to Mitsuru Sasako, MD, Department of Surgery, Gastric Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital 1-1, Tsukiji 5-chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan; e-mail: msasako{at}gan2.ncc.go.jp.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 AUTHOR’S DISCLOSURES OF...
 REFERENCES
 
GASTRIC CANCER seldom produces distant metastasis until it becomes stage T3 (Table 1Go).1 However, the incidence of lymph node metastasis is quite high in its early stages (Table 1Go).1 The pattern of recurrence after extended surgery (Table 2Go) is completely different from that after limited surgery and is locoregional recurrence in majority of cases.2 The deeper the tumor invasion, the more distant nodes are affected by metastasis (Table 3Go).1 Second-tier nodes are the main target of local control in this cancer, which is therefore essential to cure this carcinoma. Until recently, surgery was the only effective method of local control. Adjuvant chemotherapy has never been proven to increase survival for gastric cancer in a large trial, but radiochemotherapy as adjuvant treatment showed better results than surgery alone for the first time in a randomized controlled trial, Intergroup 0116 (Southwest Oncology Group 9008), suggesting the importance of local control for this cancer.3 However, the surgical treatment applied in the trial was gastrectomy with limited lymph node dissection in 90% of cases, and retrospective analysis of this trial elucidated that surgical undertreatment undermined survival.4 Therefore, it is questionable whether sufficient lymph node dissection can be replaced by chemoradiotherapy. The Dutch Gastric Cancer Trial comparing D1 with D2 dissection could not prove the effect of D2 dissection, mainly because of excessive postoperative mortality (10%).5 This trial highlighted the importance of surgical experience in gastric cancer surgery. The mortality rate after major surgical complication was much higher in the Dutch trial than in the consecutive series from the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo (Table 4Go). Experience in managing major adverse effects of treatment is more necessary in surgery than in medical treatment. Hospital volume is of concern in this regard. Table 5Go shows the strong correlation between hospital volume and postoperative mortality. The Japan Clinical Oncology Group 9501 trial, comparing D2 versus D3 dissection for gastric cancer, showed low mortality (0.8%) for both treatments. All participating hospitals yearly treat more than 50 cases of gastric carcinoma. Comparison of IT 0116 and JCOG 9501 is summarized in Table 6Go. We can calculate the hypothetical survival fraction for the patients in IT 0116 using the survival results of Japanese specialist institutes. The calculated results are better than the actual reported survival.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Biological Behavior of Gastric Cancer: Incidence of Metastasis and 5-Year Survival Rate
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Primary Site of Recurrence After D2
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Lymph Node Metastasis According to Depth of Tumor Invasion
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Mortality After Postoperative Major Complications
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Morbidity and Mortality After D2 Dissection for Gastric Cancer
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Comparison of Results: Trials IT-0116 and JCOG9501
 
Superiority of D2 has not been proven by randomized controlled trials. But all RCTs had the crucial problem of quality of treatment given. D2 dissection is not a dangerous procedure if done by specialists in specialized centers. D0/1 is proven to be insufficient treatment for gastric cancer. D0/1 plus chemoradiotherapy is better than D0/1 alone but probably not better than D2 alone. It is still a question if chemoradiotherapy after D2 can improve the results of D2 alone, but the more urgent issue for Japanese surgeons is to establish the standard adjuvant chemotherapy after good local control by surgery (D2 or more).


    AUTHOR’S DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 AUTHOR’S DISCLOSURES OF...
 REFERENCES
 
The author indicated no potential conflicts of interest.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 AUTHOR’S DISCLOSURES OF...
 REFERENCES
 
1. Sasako M: Surgical Management of gastric cancer: the Japanese experience, in Daly JM, Hennesy TPH, Reynolds JV (eds): Management of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer. London, W.B. Saunders, 1999, pp 107–122

2. Gunderson LL, Sosin H: Adenocarcinoma of the stomach: Area of failure in a re-operation series (second or symptomatic look) clinicopahtologic correlation and implications for adjuvant therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 8:1–11, 1982

3. Macdonald JS, Smalley SR, Benedetti J, et al: Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med 345:725–730, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Hundal SA, Macdonald JS, Benedetti J, et al: Surgical treatment variation in a prospective randomized trial of chemoradiation therapy in gastric cancer: The effect of undertreatment. Ann Surg Oncol 9:278–286, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Bonenkamp JJ, Hermans J, Sasako M, et al: Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med 340:908–914, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Robertson CS, Chung SCS, Woods SDS, et al: A prospective randomized trial comparing R1 subtotal gastrectomy with R3 total gastrectomy for antral cancer. Ann Surg 220:176–182, 1994[Medline]

7. Cuschieri A, Fayers P, Fielding J, et al: Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: Preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. Lancet 347:995–999, 1996[CrossRef][Medline]

8. Degiuli M, Sasako M, Ponti A, et al: Morbidity and mortality after D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer: results of the Italian Gastric Cancer Study Group prospective multicenter surgical study. J Clin Oncol 16:1490–1493, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Sue-Ling H, Johnston D, Martin IG, et al: Gastric cancer: A curable disease in Britain. B M J 307:591–596, 1993

10. Pacelli F, Doglietto GB, Bellantone R, et al: Extensive versus limited lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: A comparative study of 320 patients. Br J Surg 80:1153–1156, 1993[Medline]

Submitted October 2, 2003; accepted October 2, 2003.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
F. Pacelli, V. Papa, F. Rosa, A. P. Tortorelli, A. M. Sanchez, M. Covino, M. Bossola, and G. B. Doglietto
Four Hundred Consecutive Total Gastrectomies for Gastric Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience
Arch Surg, August 1, 2008; 143(8): 769 - 775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. Ohtsu, S. Yoshida, and N. Saijo
Disparities in Gastric Cancer Chemotherapy Between the East and West
J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2006; 24(14): 2188 - 2196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. C. Yao, J. F. Tseng, S. Worah, K. R. Hess, P. F. Mansfield, C. H. Crane, I. I. Schnirer, S. Reddy, S. S. Chiang, A. Najam, et al.
Clinicopathologic Behavior of Gastric Adenocarcinoma in Hispanic Patients: Analysis of a Single Institution's Experience Over 15 Years
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2005; 23(13): 3094 - 3103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sasako, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sasako, M.

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online