Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gandhi, V.
Right arrow Articles by Keating, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gandhi, V.
Right arrow Articles by Keating, M. J.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 19, Issue 8 (April), 2001: 2142-2152
© 2001 American Society for Clinical Oncology

Evaluation of the Combination of Nelarabine and Fludarabine in Leukemias: Clinical Response, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics in Leukemia Cells

By Varsha Gandhi, William Plunkett, Steve Weller, Min Du, Mary Ayres, Carlos O. Rodriguez, Jr, Prameen Ramakrishna, Gary L. Rosner, Jeff P. Hodge, Susan O’Brien, Michael J. Keating

From the Departments of Experimental Therapeutics, Biostatistics, and Leukemia, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and GlaxoWellcome Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC.

Address reprint requests to Varsha Gandhi, PhD, Department of Experimental Therapeutics, Box 71, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; email: vgandhi{at}mdanderson.org


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PURPOSE: A pilot protocol was designed to evaluate the efficacy of fludarabine with nelarabine (the prodrug of arabinosylguanine [ara-G]) in patients with hematologic malignancies. The cellular pharmacokinetics was investigated to seek a relationship between response and accumulation of ara-G triphosphate (ara-GTP) in circulating leukemia cells and to evaluate biochemical modulation of cellular ara-GTP metabolism by fludarabine triphosphate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine of the 13 total patients had indolent leukemias, including six whose disease failed prior fludarabine therapy. Two patients had T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia, one had chronic myelogenous leukemia, and one had mycosis fungoides. Nelarabine (1.2 g/m2) was infused on days 1, 3, and 5. On days 3 and 5, fludarabine (30 mg/m2) was administered 4 hours before the nelarabine infusion. Plasma and cellular pharmacokinetic measurements were conducted during the first 5 days.

RESULTS: Seven patients had a partial or complete response, six of whom had indolent leukemias. The disease in four responders had failed prior fludarabine therapy. The median peak intracellular concentrations of ara-GTP were significantly different (P = .001) in responders (890 µmol/L, n = 6) and nonresponders (30 µmol/L, n = 6). Also, there was a direct relationship between the peak fludarabine triphosphate and ara-GTP in each patient (r = 0.85). The cellular elimination of ara-GTP was slow (median, 35 hours; range, 18 to > 48 hours). The ratio of ara-GTP to its normal counterpart, deoxyguanosine triphosphate, was higher in each patient (median, 42; range, 14 to 1,092) than that of fludarabine triphosphate to its normal counterpart, deoxyadenosine triphosphate (median, 2.2; range, 0.2 to 27).

CONCLUSION: Fludarabine plus nelarabine is an effective, well-tolerated regimen against leukemias. Clinical responses suggest the need for further exploration of nelarabine against fludarabine-refractory diseases. Determination of ara-GTP levels in the target tumor population may provide a prognostic test for the activity of nelarabine.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
THE SUCCESS OF purine nucleoside analogs such as cladribine,1,2 pentostatin,3,4 and fludarabine5,6 in a diverse group of indolent hematologic malignancies has provided a rationale for the clinical evaluation of the arabinosyl analog of deoxyguanosine, 9-ß-D-arabinosylguanine (ara-G). Although the synthesis of ara-G was reported in 1964,7 its low solubility and difficulty in synthesis dampened enthusiasm for clinical development. Nelarabine (compound 506U78 or 2-amino-6-methoxypurine arabinoside), was synthesized enzymatically from diaminopurine arabinoside.8 The purpose of this synthesis was to provide a clinically useful water-soluble prodrug of ara-G.9 Although not active itself, demethoxylation of nelarabine by adenosine deaminase converts it to biologically active ara-G. Nelarabine is a poor substrate for adenosine deaminase, having a substrate efficiency of less than 1% of that of adenosine, however, the high specific activity of this enzyme in RBCs and body organs has been shown to result in the rapid conversion of nelarabine to ara-G in monkeys.9

Consistent with this observation, plasma pharmacokinetic studies in humans during a phase I trial suggested that peak ara-G levels are quickly achieved after nelarabine infusion.10 Although the ara-G peak levels were dependent on the dose of nelarabine, even at the lowest dose, 20 µmol/L ara-G was achieved in plasma. Based on in vitro data9 and the kinetic values for phosphorylation by deoxyguanosine (dGuo) kinase11,12 and deoxycytidine (dCyd) kinase,9,13 it could be predicted that such levels would result in cytotoxic concentrations of ara-G triphosphate (ara-GTP) in the circulating leukemia cells.

Cellular pharmacokinetics showed a trend of dose-dependent accumulation of cellular ara-GTP; however, a major finding of this study14 was the diagnosis-specific accumulation of ara-GTP.15 Patients having T-cell lymphoblasts generally had a higher level of ara-GTP than did those having myeloblasts or B-cell lymphoblasts. Importantly, the clinical response to this analog14 was directly related to the peak level of ara-GTP, which was three-fold greater in leukemia cells of patients who achieved complete or partial remission in comparison with patients who failed this therapy.15 Also, using human leukemia cell lines, it has been shown that the marked cytotoxicity of ara-G to T cells16,17 is associated with greater accumulation and more prolonged retention of the cytotoxic triphosphate ara-GTP.18,19 Consistent with this observation, greater accumulation of ara-GTP was also evident in ex vivo cultures of primary T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) cells.20 These in vitro,16-19 ex vivo,20 and in vivo15 data indicated that the clinical success of nelarabine may be related to the cellular accumulation of ara-GTP.

Although, the clinical responses (overall response rate = 31%) observed in this phase I investigation14,15 generally occurred in patients with T-cell lymphoblastic diseases (21 of 39 patients, 54%), the lone patient having B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) achieved partial remission.14,15 This clinical result encouraged us to test nelarabine in indolent leukemias, and the pharmacologic data prompted us to develop strategies that would result in an increase in the cellular accumulation of ara-GTP.21 One of the approaches was biochemical modulation of ara-GTP accumulation by the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor, fludarabine. Clinically achievable levels of fludarabine triphosphate (F-ara-ATP)22 can mediate a decrease in deoxynucleotides, especially deoxycytidine triphosphate and deoxyguanosine triphosphate (dGTP) pools, that may result in decreased feed-back inhibition of dCyd and dGuo kinase, respectively.23,24 Each of these kinases are involved in the initial phosphorylation of ara-G to ara-G monophosphate, which is the rate-limiting step in the synthesis of ara-GTP.11-13 Such biochemical modulation strategies combining fludarabine with cytarabine have previously been tested and validated during therapy for acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).25,26

Based on these pharmacokinetic, clinical, and biochemical rationales, a pilot protocol was designed to combine fludarabine with nelarabine. Here we report the clinical outcome, pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic end points, biochemical modulation, and comparison of the metabolism of these two purine nucleoside analogs in leukemia cells.


    PATIENTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patients
Thirteen adult patients having hematologic malignancies received treatment at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center from August 1997 to January 1998 ( Table 1). The majority of the patients had indolent leukemias, however, two patients had T-ALL, one had chronic myelogenous leukemia in blast crisis (myeloid), and one had mycosis fungoides (MF) in blastic transformation. All patients were included in the pharmacology investigations for the first course (days 1 to 5). One patient (patient no. 11) was studied only for few hours on day 1 because of development of a pulmonary infection.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Patient Diagnoses, Characteristics, and Responses
 
Protocol Design
This was a pilot protocol designed to test efficacy of fludarabine with nelarabine and to evaluate biochemical modulation of cellular ara-GTP metabolism by fludarabine triphosphate. Each patient received a 2-hour intravenous infusion of 1.2 g/m2 nelarabine over 1 hour on day 1. On days 3 and 5, the same dose of nelarabine was administered; however, 4 hours before the nelarabine infusion, 30 mg/m2 fludarabine was infused over a half an hour. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analyses were obtained before treatment and for 5 days. This schedule permitted evaluation of the plasma and cellular pharmacology when nelarabine was infused alone (day 1) or in combination with fludarabine (days 3 and 5). The 5-day therapy course was repeated every 21 to 28 days. The protocol design and pharmacologic investigations were approved by the institutional review board. Patients were informed about the investigational nature of this program in accord with the institutional policies.

Drug and Other Chemicals
For clinical use, nelarabine was obtained from Glaxo Wellcome Inc (Research Triangle Park, NC), and fludarabine was obtained from Schering Research Institute (Berlin, Germany). For cellular pharmacokinetics, high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) standards, ara-GTP, and F-ara-ATP were custom synthesized by Sierra Biochemicals (Tucson, AZ). All other chemicals were reagent grade.

Criteria for Response and Toxicity
The National Cancer Institute (NCI) working group criteria for response in CLL patients were used for both CLL and prolymphocytic leukemia patients. Conventional criteria for response were used for ALL, chronic myelogenous leukemia in blast crisis, and MF patients. Toxicity was evaluated using the NCI common toxicity criteria version 2.0 (1998) grading system.

Blood Samples for Clinical Pharmacology
Plasma and cellular pharmacokinetic investigations were conducted in all patients throughout the first course of therapy. Blood samples (10 mL) were obtained and transferred to green stopper vacutainer tubes containing heparin and 1 µmol/L deoxycoformycin (obtained from the NCI, Bethesda, MD) to inhibit conversion of nelarabine to ara-G by adenosine deaminase. The tubes were immediately placed in an ice-water bath and transported to the laboratory. Control studies have demonstrated that leukemic blasts are stable under these conditions with respect to size and membrane integrity. The cellular nucleotide content is stable for at least 15 hours under these conditions. All patients gave written informed consent for plasma and cellular pharmacology investigations.

Plasma Pharmacology
To determine the pharmacokinetics of nelarabine and ara-G, blood samples were obtained before treatment, at the end of the nelarabine infusion, and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 24 hours after the infusion. Samples were also obtained before the fludarabine infusion on day 3, at the end of the fludarabine infusion on day 3, and 2 and 4 hours after the infusion. Additional samples were obtained at the end of the second nelarabine infusion, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 24 hours afterward. Again, samples were obtained before the fludarabine infusion, before and at the end of the nelarabine infusion on day 5. The plasma was removed after centrifugation and stored at -70°C until HPLC analyses were performed. Plasma nelarabine and ara-G were separated and quantitated using a previously described procedure10 and analyzed at Glaxo Wellcome, Inc.

Cellular Pharmacology
Cell pellets from blood samples were diluted with phosphate-buffered saline, and mononuclear cells were isolated using Ficoll-Hypaque density-gradient step-gradient centrifugation procedures described previously.27 A Coulter electronics channelyzer (Coulter Corporation, Hialeah, FL) was used to determine the mean cell volume. After being washed with phosphate-buffered saline, cells were processed for nucleotide extraction. Normal nucleotides, F-ara-ATP, and ara-GTP were extracted from cells using standard procedures with HClO4. Ribonucleotides, F-ara-ATP, and ara-GTP were separated on an anion-exchange Partisil-10 SAX column (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA) using HPLC, as described in detail previously.28 The intracellular concentration was calculated and expressed as the quantity of nucleotides contained in the extract from a given number of cells of a determined mean volume. This calculation assumes that nucleotides are uniformly distributed in total cell water. In general, the lower limit of integration of this assay was about 10 pmol in an extract of 2 x 107 cells, corresponding to a cellular concentration of approximately 2 µmol/L.

Determination of Intracellular dATP and dGTP Pools
Nucleotides in the mononuclear cells obtained using the Ficoll-Hypaque procedure were extracted using 60% methanol for the determination of deoxyadenosine triphosphate (dATP) and dGTP pools. The DNA polymerase assay as modified by Sherman and Fyfe29 was used to quantitate dATP and dGTP in the cell extracts. A Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I lacking exonuclease activity (U.S. Biochemical Corporation, Cleveland, OH) was used to start a reaction in a mixture that contained 100 mmol/L HEPES buffer, pH 7.3, 10 mmol/L MgCl2, 7.5 µg BSA, and synthetic oligonucleotides of defined sequences as templates annealed to a primer, [3H]dATP or, [3H] deoxythymidine triphosphate (dTTP) and either standard (dGTP/dATP) or the extract from 1 or 2 x 106 leukemia cells before and after therapy. Reactants were incubated for 1 hour and applied to filter discs. After the discs were washed, the radioactivity on the discs was determined using liquid scintillation counting and compared with that in the standard dGTP/dATP samples.

Calculations and Statistical Analysis
Linear regression analyses for the r value for F-ara-ATP and ara-GTP were obtained using the Prism software program (GraphPad Software, Inc, San Diego, CA). This software was also used to compare plasma pharmacology after the first and second infusions of nelarabine using Wilcoxon signed rank two-tailed t test for matched pairs and to determine the relationship between cellular pharmacokinetics and clinical response using Mann-Whitney two-tailed t test.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patient Characteristics and Clinical Responses
The 13 patients entered on this pilot protocol had a median age of 62 years and a variety of hematologic malignancies although the majority had indolent leukemias (Table 1). All of the patients had previously received treatments; 10 of them more than once. Generally, the patients having indolent leukemias had received treatments using other purine analogs, such as fludarabine and cladribine. Patients having greater than or equal to 5% prolymphocytes were considered to have CLL in transformation (patient nos. 5, 6, and 11). Seven patients (54%) had an objective response to this combination regimen. In addition, there were six responders among the nine patients having indolent leukemias; five had a complete or partial remission, whereas one had stable disease. Interestingly, among the six purine (fludarabine or cladribine) analog-refractory patients, four achieved remission and one had stable disease. Also one of the two T-ALL patients had a complete remission.

Toxicity
The fludarabine plus nelarabine multicourse regimen was well tolerated by patients, producing modest hematologic toxicity. Grade 1 and 2 myelosuppression and thrombocytopenia were seen in 9% and 35% of the cases, respectively; whereas grade 3 and 4 were seen in 31% and 13%, respectively. Among the nonhematologic toxicity, only two patients had grade 3 and 4 toxicity (muscle weakness). Grade 2 toxicity included sensory neuropathy (seven patients), somnolence (four patients), muscle weakness (four patients), myalgia (three patients), fatigue (two patients), dizziness (two patients), confusion (one patient), and slurred speech (one patient).

Plasma Pharmacology
The plasma pharmacokinetics of nelarabine and ara-G were studied during the 5-day regimen ( Table 2). The nelarabine levels reached a median peak value (18 µmol/L, n = 13) at the end of first infusion. Thereafter, nelarabine was rapidly eliminated from plasma with a median half-life of 16 minutes (n = 9); in patient samples where the peak level was low (below 10 µmol/L), an adequate sample number was not available to calculate elimination half-life. This rapid metabolic clearance resulted in the accumulation of ara-G in plasma during the infusion, reaching a median peak concentration of 75 µmol/L after the first dose. In contrast to the clearance of nelarabine, ara-G was eliminated at a slower rate (median half-life [t1/2] = 4.2 hours, range 1.8 to 5.6 hours). In general, the pharmacokinetic profile of nelarabine and ara-G on days 3 and 4 in the 12 patients was similar with that on days 1 and 2. Specifically, the peak level of nelarabine and ara-G generally occurred at the end of each nelarabine infusion. The peak level of ara-G was slightly greater after the second infusion on day 3; however, this level was not significantly different from that achieved on day 1 (P = .23, Wilcoxon signed rank test, Table 2). Similarly, the area under the curve (AUC) values of ara-G were slightly greater on day 3. Also, the elimination kinetics for ara-G were linear in all patients during the times investigated. In particular, the median half-life of elimination for ara-G was 3.8 hours on day 3 (n = 12). These data suggest that the pharmacokinetic profiles were not affected by fludarabine infusion before administration of nelarabine on day 3. No differences in plasma pharmacokinetics (peak concentration or elimination half-life) were apparent among the different diagnoses or between responders and nonresponders (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Plasma Pharmacokinetics of Nelarabine and ara-G During Therapy
 
Cellular Pharmacology of ara-GTP
Leukemia cells isolated from blood samples obtained during therapy from the 12 patients having leukemia and peripheral-blood mononuclear cells obtained from the patient having MF were analyzed for cellular accumulation and retention of ara-GTP on days 1 through 4. On day 1, the time of the peak ara-GTP level in the circulating peripheral-blood cells varied among the patients; in five patients the peak occurred within 3 hours after the end of the infusion, but in the other seven, it ranged from 7 to 40 hours after the end of the infusion (data not shown). Although the median peak concentration of ara-GTP was 84 µmol/L (range, 22 to 1,420 µmol/L; Table 3), the distribution of these values seemed to be bimodal; less than 100 µmol/L in six patients and more than 350 µmol/L in the other six. These values will be discussed further under accumulation of ara-GTP and relationship to response.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Cellular Pharmacokinetics of ara-GTP During First and Second Infusion
 
Circulating peripheral-blood leukemia cells obtained from 11 patients with leukemia and normal peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (patient no. 8) obtained from patients with MF were also evaluated for retention of ara-GTP after the ara-GTP peak ( Table 4). The data presented in Fig 1 were selected to illustrate the extremes in the elimination kinetics of ara-GTP in leukemia cells. For example, a component of the population exhibited only minor elimination of ara-GTP, with a similar increment in ara-GTP accumulation occurring after the second nelarabine infusion (Fig 1A). Such elimination kinetics, which challenge the ability to accurately compute the rate of elimination, were observed in patient nos. 2, 3, 5, 9, 10, and 12 and did not seem to be lineage-specific (Table 4). In contrast, there was a separate cohort with more rapid elimination of ara-GTP, t1/2 values ranged from 18 to 27 hours (eg, Fig 1B). Nevertheless, the leukemia cells in these patients all retained a significant concentration of ara-GTP before the infusion of the second nelarabine dose (Table 3). For instance, cells having an ara-GTP elimination t1/2 of more than 35 hours retained between 45% and 100% of the peak ara-GTP concentration, whereas those having more rapid ara-GTP elimination kinetics (t1/2 = 18 to 27 hours) had 17% to 27% of the peak ara-GTP concentration at 48 hours. In addition, the ara-GTP t1/2 values after the first and second nelarabine infusions were similar within patients, regardless of the absolute rate of elimination. In all leukemia cases, ara-GTP elimination seemed to be linear in the leukemia cells. Additionally, peripheral-blood mononuclear cells obtained from the MF patient in transformation had the fastest rate of ara-GTP elimination, with a t1/2 of 13 hours and undetectable level of ara-GTP before the second infusion of nelarabine.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Cellular Pharmacokinetics of ara-GTP and F-ara-ATP
 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Accumulation and elimination kinetics of ara-GTP (•) and F-ara-ATP ({blacktriangleup}) in cells obtained from two patients with B-CLL: (A) slow elimination profile (patient no. 2) for ara-GTP; (B) fast-elimination profile (patient no. 1) for ara-GTP. The solid squares on the abscissa represent the first and second infusions of nelarabine; the arrow on the abscissa denotes the infusion of fludarabine.

 
The cellular pharmacokinetic profile of ara-GTP described above was compared with that on day 3, ie, when fludarabine and nelarabine were infused as a couplet with a 4-hour interval between the two drugs. Although there was an increase in the peak level of ara-GTP in the majority of cases on day 3 compared with that on day 1, the pharmacokinetic characteristics of ara-GTP made it difficult to directly attribute this increase to a biochemical modulation mechanism. This was because of the fact that there was substantial residual ara-GTP at the time of the second nelarabine infusion in the majority of the patients’ cells, (ie, 48 hours after the start of therapy, Table 3). For example, the residual ara-GTP at 48 hours ranged from 17% to 100% of the peak value in leukemia cells and was related to the elimination rate of ara-GTP. Of the six patients in which the residual ara-GTP concentration was below 20 µmol/L, three had a greater than 10% increase in ara-GTP compared with the additive value (the ara-GTP peak on day 1 plus the residual ara-GTP at 48 hours) suggesting biochemical modulation.

Cellular Pharmacology of F-ara-ATP
Cells isolated from the 12 leukemia patients during therapy were also analyzed for the cellular pharmacokinetics of F-ara-ATP after the fludarabine infusion on day 3 (Fig 1, Table 4). In contrast to the peak levels of ara-GTP, the peak F-ara-ATP levels were relatively low (P = .009, n = 12 pairs, nonparametric paired t test), with a median value of 50 µmol/L and a narrow range (25 to 160 µmol/L, Table 4). Furthermore, the apparent bimodal distribution of the ara-GTP peak values was not observed for F-ara-ATP. The peak generally occurred within the first 6 hours after the fludarabine infusion (data not shown). Cells isolated from the first eight patients were also evaluated for retention of F-ara-ATP. The median elimination t1/2 of F-ara-ATP was 15 hours (range, 12 to > 44 hours, Table 4).

Relationship Between ara-GTP and F-ara-ATP Accumulation
Phosphorylation of ara-G and F-ara-A to the respective monophosphates is the rate-limiting step in triphosphate accumulation.9,11-13 Although both these analogs are phosphorylated by dCyd kinase, ara-G is also a substrate for dGuo kinase.11,12 Thus, the peak values of ara-GTP and F-ara-ATP were compared as a means of evaluating the relative contribution of the latter enzyme ( Fig 2). Overall, there was a direct relationship between the peak values. Because of the apparent bimodal distribution of the ara-GTP peak values (Table 3), we compared each group separately with respect to the relationship with F-ara-ATP accumulation. In both groups, there was a direct proportionality with respect to the peak concentrations of the triphosphates in cells (low ara-GTP, r = 0.72, Fig 2; high ara-GTP, r = 0.77, Fig 2). However, the absolute quantitative relationships differed. The F-ara-ATP peak was quantitatively similar to that of ara-GTP in the cohort of patients having relatively low ara-GTP accumulation (Fig 2). Although the F-ara-ATP levels were similar in both groups, in the group defined by a relatively high ara-GTP level, the concentrations of this analog were approximately 10-fold greater than F-ara-ATP (Fig 2). This disproportionality in purine nucleoside metabolism suggested that a cohort of the population is favorably predisposed to ara-GTP accumulation.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Relationship between accumulation of ara-GTP and F-ara-ATP in the cells obtained from patients. The cellular ara-GTP and F-ara-ATP peaks were calculated as described in the Patients and Methods and plotted for patients having low ({blacktriangleup}) or high (•) ara-GTP accumulation.

 
Comparison of ara-GTP and F-ara-ATP Pharmacokinetics and Their Ratios With Competing dNTPs
The dominant cytotoxic action of these nucleoside analogs is associated with their incorporation into DNA. Thus, the ratio of the cellular concentration of the analog triphosphates to that of the normal deoxynucleoside triphosphate with which they compete for incorporation by DNA polymerases is a key indicator of this function. Adequate leukemia cells were obtained from 12 patients for analysis of endogenous dGTP levels, and 10 patients for quantitation of the dATP pools. In all cases, the levels of these dNTPs were determined in pretreatment samples and on day 3 before the fludarabine infusion. In most cases, samples were also analyzed after the end of the first nelarabine infusion and 2 or 3 hours later for longitudinal studies. There were no significant changes in the levels of these dNTPs within individual patients during the first 40 hours (not shown). However, the cellular levels of dGTP and dATP varied greatly among patients even those having a similar diagnosis (Table 4). Specifically, the concentrations of dGTP were generally low with a median value of 1.6 µmol/L (range 0.7 to 35 µmol/L). Relative to the dGTP pool, the endogenous levels of dATP were greater, with a median value of 15 µmol/L (range, 3.9 to 368 µmol/L). In addition, there was a higher concentration of dATP in leukemia cells as well as a relatively lower level of intracellular F-ara-ATP (compare F-ara-ATP with ara-GTP, Table 4). Therefore, the ratio of analog triphosphate to competing dNTP, was significantly (P = .0002, Mann-Whitney nonparametric unpaired t test) lower for F-ara-ATP/dATP (median = 2.2, n = 10) than that for ara-GTP/dGTP (median = 42, n = 12). This would seem to favor the action of the deoxyguanosine analog over that of the deoxyadenosine analog.

Relationship Between Cellular Pharmacology and Clinical Responses
Our first phase I study using nelarabine as a single agent suggested that in acute leukemias there was a relationship between accumulation of ara-GTP and response to nelarabine therapy.14-15 To investigate whether such a correlation also existed in patients having indolent leukemias who received nelarabine in combination with fludarabine, we compared the peak levels of ara-GTP in responders and nonresponders. The cohort of individuals who were among the responders accumulated a median of 890 µmol/L ara-GTP (range, 85 to 1,420 µmol/L). This group included one patient (patient no. 1) who had hematologic improvement (ara-GTP level, 85 µmol/L) and six patients who had a partial or complete remission (ara-GTP levels, 350 to 1,420 µmol/L). Although there was wide variation in the concentrations of cellular ara-GTP, cells obtained from all responders had greater ara-GTP levels than did those obtained from nonresponders ( Fig 3). The median level of ara-GTP among the six nonresponders was 30 µmol/L (range, 22 to 47 µmol/L). Compared with this level, the median level ara-GTP in the seven responding patients was about 30-fold greater, and there was a significant difference between response groups (Fig 3A, P = .001). Similar to the peak levels of ara-GTP, there was also a relationship between the AUC of ara-GTP (first infusion of nelarabine) and responses of patients (P = .003, Fig 3B). The leukemia cells obtained from patients who had a complete or partial responses had a greater than 15,000 µmol/L-hour AUC of ara-GTP. This contrasts with the cells obtained from patients whose disease progressed during therapy (< 1,500 µmol/L-hour AUC). One patient who had stable disease (patient no. 1) had an AUC of 1,800 µmol/L-hour (shown with an asterisk, Fig 3B). Consistent with an earlier study,22 there was no apparent relationship between the cellular concentration of F-ara-ATP and clinical response (P = .08, not shown).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Relationship between clinical response and peak ara-GTP concentration (A) or ara-GTP AUC (B) in leukemia cells during nelarabine therapy. The intracellular levels of ara-GTP were quantitated as described in Patients and Methods. Data are obtained from patients whose disease responded to therapy (•), who had stable disease (*), or whose disease did not respond ({blacktriangleup}) are plotted.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The response of a patient having B-cell CLL to nelarabine in the initial phase I trial provided the incentive to further explore the efficacy of this agent alone and in combinations against indolent leukemias.14 A second phase I investigation of nelarabine as a single agent on an alternate-day schedule is being evaluated and will be reported elsewhere.30 The present investigation of fludarabine and nelarabine in a sequential combination therapy was based on previous clinical results using combination of fludarabine and ara-C against leukemias.25,26 Furthermore, in vitro studies using human leukemia cell lines23 and ex vivo investigations using primary acute and chronic leukemia cells demonstrated that a similar biochemical modulation strategy could be successfully applied to the fludarabine and ara-G combination.21 Based on these preclinical rationales and the activity of fludarabine against indolent leukemias,5,6 the present protocol was designed to infuse these agents as a couplet. Nelarabine was infused alone on day 1 as a design strategy to facilitate the evaluation of fludarabine action on the cellular ara-GTP pharmacokinetics on administration of the couplet.

Consistent with earlier studies of monkeys9 and humans,10,15 the short elimination half-life of nelarabine in plasma (median = 16 minutes, Table 2) and the concomitant increase in the level of ara-G suggested a rapid metabolic conversion of the prodrug to ara-G. Furthermore, the similar peak plasma concentrations of ara-G during the first infusion when nelarabine was given alone and the second infusion when fludarabine and nelarabine were administered as a couplet (Table 2) suggested that fludarabine did not affect this metabolic conversion profile (P = .16). This was expected because fludarabine is neither a substrate nor an effective inhibitor of adenosine deaminase,31 the enzyme responsible for demethoxylation of nelarabine to generate ara-G.9 Thus, fludarabine does not interfere with the ability of nelarabine to serve as an effective prodrug for rapid formation of ara-G in plasma.

Comparison of the plasma pharmacokinetics with diagnosis and response to therapy demonstrated that neither the peak levels of nelarabine, ara-G, nor the plasma elimination kinetics of ara-G were related to these clinical parameters (data not shown). However, ara-G concentrations are important regarding cellular accumulation of ara-GTP. This is based on the fact that linear relationships between the ara-G concentrations at different nelarabine doses and the accumulation of ara-GTP by leukemia cells have been observed both in vitro21 and in vivo.15 For this reason, in the present trial, we selected the daily dose to be the maximum-tolerated dose of nelarabine (1.2 g/m2/d) on a 5-day schedule in combination with fludarabine. However, instead of giving five infusions, the prodrug was infused on days 1, 3, and 5 to accommodate the addition of fludarabine doses on days 3 and 5. Furthermore, the alternate-day schedule was based on the prolonged intracellular retention (t1/2, > 24 hours) of ara-GTP observed in our original investigation15 indicating that cytotoxic levels of ara-GTP may be retained for as long as 48 hours, thereby avoiding the need for daily nelarabine infusions. Finally, the alternate-day schedule of administering nelarabine as a single agent has demonstrated clinical efficacy in the setting of indolent leukemias.30

In the present study, there was a wide variation in the peak levels of ara-GTP. Consistent with our previous phase I investigation with nelarabine,15 peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (patient no. 8), myeloid leukemia cells (patient no. 4), and T-CLL cells (patient no. 3) accumulated less than 50 µmol/L ara-GTP. Among other diseases, there was interpatient heterogeneity in the ability to accumulate ara-GTP in cells obtained from patients with T-ALL, T-prolymphocytic leukemia, and B-CLL, and there was a strong relationship between ara-GTP accumulation and clinical response (Fig 3). As this was also observed in our previous phase I trial of nelarabine administered alone to patients with a variety of hematologic malignancies,15 it will be important to prospectively evaluate the prognostic potential of triphosphate levels determined in vitro and during therapy.

The 70-fold variation in the ara-GTP levels in the leukemia cells of these patients is likely to reflect heterogeneity in ara-G phosphorylation. For instance, the variation may be because of the differences in the cellular levels of dCyd kinase and dGuo kinase available for phosphorylation of ara-G. Importantly, F-ara-A is also phosphorylated by dCyd kinase.13 Because dCyd kinase is present at a relatively high specific activity in lymphoid cells, it may be expected that this enzyme may also predominate for the accumulation of ara-GTP. Hence, among individuals a proportional accumulation of these two purine analog triphosphates may be expected. In general, such a relationship was observed in the 12 assessable patient samples (r = 0.85). Nonetheless, these data also show that ara-GTP accumulation was bimodal in the leukemia cells (< 100 µmol/L, n = 6; > 350 µmol/L, n = 6, Fig 2). Additionally, in a cohort of individuals having low ara-GTP peak values, F-ara-ATP levels were quantitatively similar (Fig 2), indicating the phosphorylation of both analogs by dCyd kinase. In the other group, the peak levels of ara-GTP were 10-fold greater than those of F-ara-ATP (Fig 2), suggesting an additional contribution of dGuo kinase in ara-G phosphorylation. Prospective evaluation of the expression of each of these kinases in primary leukemia cells may provide a biochemical basis for the pharmacologic differences in the accumulation of ara-GTP. As an experimental approach, the role of each kinase in phosphorylation of ara-G is being explored using stable transfection and expression of the dCyd or dGuo kinase genes in a cell line lacking dCyd kinase and expressing a low level of dGuo kinase.32,33

As observed before in T-ALL patients, there was a strong direct relationship between accumulation of ara-GTP and clinical response using nelarabine plus fludarabine combination therapy (Fig 3). Most of the responding patients had indolent leukemias, a finding that extends the potential utility of nelarabine to these diseases. Because two infusions of fludarabine were given during each course, the role of fludarabine in the observed responses using this protocol cannot be ruled out. Analysis of the role of F-ara-ATP in modulating the accumulation of ara-GTP was complicated by substantial residual ara-GTP at the time of the second nelarabine infusion (Table 3). Even in the absence of a biochemical modulation benefit with this combination, F-ara-ATP may provide a molecular advantage at the DNA level. Such interactions between two nucleoside analog triphosphates have been demonstrated before, albeit in an in vitro setting.34

One observation that favors the effectiveness of nelarabine alone against indolent leukemias is that four of the six patients whose disease was refractory to prior fludarabine therapy had a response to the nelarabine plus fludarabine combination regimen (Table 1). This observation raises the postulate that these two purine analogs are not cross-resistant. Although data are available from only a limited number of patients, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics with each of these purine analogs (Table 4) may explain the observed superiority of nelarabine. The predominant locus of action of nucleoside analogs is at the level of DNA synthesis as a consequence of analog incorporation into DNA. Cytarabine,35,36 fludarabine,37,38 and gemcitabine39 are examples of nucleosides in which incorporation into the DNA is strongly correlated with cytotoxicity. Although data regarding the site and extent of incorporation of ara-GTP into DNA of intact cells are not available, published evidence demonstrates that the incorporation of ara-GTP into the replicating DNA of whole cells is necessary for the inhibition of DNA synthesis, execution of high-molecular-weight DNA fragmentation, and apoptosis.40 Using an in vitro DNA primer assay, we and others have demonstrated that the molecular basis for ara-GTP–induced inhibition of DNA synthesis is due in part to incorporation of the nucleoside analog.41-43 This depends on the ratio of the concentrations of the available analog triphosphate to the natural substrate, dGTP. A similar scenario has been proposed for F-ara-ATP and dATP in both an in vitro assay38 and whole cells.44 In addition, a comparison of the ratio of the peak analog triphosphate level with the endogenous competing dNTP level in the leukemic lymphocytes of the fludarabine-refractory patients indicated that this ratio was significantly (P = .005, Mann-Whitney t test) greater for ara-GTP/dGTP (median, 60.5; n = 6; patient nos. 1, 2, 5, 10, 11, and 12) than for F-ara-ATP/dATP (median, 1.5; n = 4; patient nos. 2, 5, 10, and 12). Although the ara-GTP to dGTP ratio is favorable for a pharmacodynamic and clinical response to nelarabine, this postulate needs to be investigated further using either cell lines or primary patient samples.

In conclusion, the present investigation identifies the therapeutic potential of the combination of nelarabine and fludarabine against indolent leukemias, which is effective and well tolerated. Furthermore, the study also provides a compelling pharmacokinetic basis for the activity of nelarabine; determination of ara-GTP levels in the target tumor population may provide a prognostic test for that activity. The response of patients with a variety of hematologic malignancies to nelarabine provides an indication for further exploration of this agent alone and in combinations. In particular, responses in fludarabine-refractory patients suggest the utility of nelarabine in diseases that are refractory to other purine analogs.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Carol Bivins and Susan Lerner for patient data management and coordination and Don Norwood for critically editing the manuscript.

Supported in part by grant nos. CA32839, CA57629, and CA81534 from the National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
1. Piro LD, Carrera CJ, Beutler E, et al: 2-Chlorodeoxyadenosine, an effective new agent for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 72: 1069-1073, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Juliusson G, Liliemark J: High complete remission rate from 2-chloro-2'-deoxyadenosine (CdA) in previously treated patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Response predicted by rapid decrease of blood lymphocyte count. J Clin Oncol 11: 679-689, 1993[Abstract]

3. Ho AD, Thaler J, Stryckmans P, et al: Pentostatin in refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A phase II trial of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 82: 1416-1420, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Kraut EH, Bouroncle BA, Grever MR: Pentostatin in the treatment of advanced hairy cell leukemia. J Clin Oncol 7: 168-172, 1989[Abstract]

5. Keating MJ, Kantarjian H, Talpaz M, et al: Fludarabine: A new agent with major activity against chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 74: 19-25, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Keating MJ, O’Brien S, Koller C, et al: Long-term follow-up of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) receiving fludarabine regimens as initial therapy. Blood 92: 1165-1171, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Reist EJ, Goodman L: Synthesis of 9-ß-D arabinofuranosylguanine. Biochemistry 3: 15-18, 1964

8. Krenitsky TA, Koszalka GW, Tuttle JV, et al: An enzymatic synthesis of purine-D-arabinonucleosides. Carbohydr Res 97: 139-146, 1981

9. Lambe CU, Averett DR, Paff MT, et al: 2-Amino-6-methoxypurine arabinoside: An agent for T-cell malignancies. Cancer Res 55: 3352-3356, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Kisor DF, Plunkett W, Kurtzberg J, et al: The pharmacokinetics of nelarabine and 9-ß-D-arabinofuranosyl guanine in pediatric and adult patients during a phase I study of nelarabine for the treatment of refractory hematologic malignancies. J Clin Oncol 18: 995-1003, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Lewis RA, Link L: Phosphorylation of arabinosyl guanine by a mitochondrial enzyme of bovine liver. Biochem Pharmacol 38: 2001-2006, 1989[Medline]

12. Wang L, Karlsson A, Arnér ESJ, et al: Substrate specificity of mitochondrial 2'-deoxyguanosine kinase: Efficient phosphorylation of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine. J Biol Chem 268: 22847-22852, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Krenitsky TA, Tuttle JV, Koszalka GW, et al: Deoxycytidine kinase from calf thymus: Substrate and inhibitor specificity. J Biol Chem 251: 4055-4061, 1976[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Kurtzberg J, Ernst TJ, Keating MJ, et al: A phase I study of 2-amino-9-ß-D-arabinosyl-6-methoxy-9H-purine (nelarabine) administered on a consecutive five day schedule in children and adults with refractory hematologic malignancies. Blood 94: 629a, 1999 (abstr 2794)

15. Gandhi V, Plunkett W, Rodriguez CO Jr, et al: Compound GW506U78 in refractory hematologic malignancies: Relationship between cellular pharmacokinetics and clinical response. J Clin Oncol 16: 3607-3615, 1998[Abstract]

16. Cohen A, Lee JWW, Gelfand EW: Selective toxicity of deoxyguanosine and arabinosyl guanine for T-leukemic cells. Blood 61: 660-666, 1983[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Ullman B, Martin DW: Specific cytotoxicity of arabinosyl-guanine toward cultured T-lymphoblasts. J Clin Invest 74: 951-955, 1984

18. Shewach DS, Daddona PE, Ashcraft E, et al: Metabolism and selective cytotoxicity of 9-ß-D-arabinofuranosylguanine in human lymphoblasts. Cancer Res 45: 1008-1014, 1985[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Verhoef V, Fridland A: Metabolic basis of arabinonucleoside selectivity for human leukemic T- and B-lymphoblasts. Cancer Res 45: 3646-3650, 1985[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Shewach DS, Mitchell BS: Differential metabolism of 9-ß-arabinofuranosylguanine in human leukemic cells. Cancer Res 49: 6498-6502, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Rodriguez CO Jr, Legha JK, Estey E, et al: Pharmacological and biochemical strategies to increase the accumulation of arabinofuranosylguanine triphosphate in primary human leukemia cells. Clin Cancer Res 3: 2107-2113, 1997[Abstract]

22. Gandhi V, Kemena A, Keating MJ, et al: Cellular pharmacology of fludarabine triphosphate in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells during fludarabine therapy. Leuk Lymphoma 10: 49-56, 1993[Medline]

23. Gandhi V, Plunkett W: Interaction of arabinosyl nucleotides in K562 human leukemia cells. Biochem Pharmacol 38: 3551-3558, 1989[Medline]

24. Gandhi V, Plunkett W: Modulation of arabinosylnucleoside metabolism by arabinosylnucleotides in human leukemia cells. Cancer Res 48: 329-334, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Gandhi V, Estey E, Keating MJ, et al: Fludarabine potentiates metabolism of arabinosylcytosine in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia during therapy. J Clin Oncol 11: 116-124, 1993[Abstract]

26. Gandhi V, Keating MJ, Estey E, et al: Fludarabine infusion potentiates arabinosylcytosine metabolism in lymphocytes of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Res 52: 897-903, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Plunkett W, Hug V, Keating M, et al: Quantitation of 1-ß-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine 5'-triphosphate in the leukemic cells from bone marrow and peripheral blood of patients receiving 1-ß-D- arabinofuranosylcytosine therapy. Cancer Res 40: 588-591, 1980[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Rodriguez CO Jr, Plunkett W, Paff MT, et al: A high-pressure liquid chromatography method for the determination and quantitation of arabinosylguanine triphosphate and fludarabine triphosphate in human cells. J Chromatogr 745: 421-430, 2000

29. Sherman PA, Fyfe FA: Enzymatic assay for deoxynucleotide triphosphates using synthetic oligonucleotides as template primer. Anal Biochem 180: 222-226, 1989[Medline]

30. O’Brien S, Thomas D, Kantarjian H, et al: Compound 506 has activity in mature lymphoid leukemia. Blood 92: 490a-491a, 1998

31. Brockman RW, Schabel FM Jr, Montgomery JA: Biologic activity of 9-ß-D-arabinofuanosyl-2-fluoroadenine, a metabolically stable analog of 9-ß-D-arabinofuranosyladenine. Biochem Pharmacol 26: 2193-2196, 1977[Medline]

32. Hepke DM, Stegmann APA, Mitchell BS: Retroviral transfer of deoxycytidine kinase into tumor cell lines enhances nucleoside toxicity. Cancer Res 56: 2343-2347, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Rodriguez CO Jr, Mitchell BS, Eriksson S, et al: Arabinosylguanine is phosphorylated by both deoxycytidine kinase and deoxyguanosine kinase. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 41: 864, 2000 (abstr 5491)

34. Gandhi V, Huang P, Chapman A, et al: Incorporation of fludarabine and arabinosylcytosine 5'-triphosphates by DNA polymerase {alpha}: Affinity, interaction, and consequences. Clin Cancer Res 3: 1347-1355, 1997[Abstract]

35. Kufe DW, Major PP, Egan EM, et al: Correlation of cytotoxicity with incorporation of ara-C into DNA. J Biol Chem 255: 8997-9000, 1980[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Kufe D, Spriggs D, Egan EM, et al: Relationships among ara-CTP pools, formation of (ara-C)DNA, and cytotoxicity of humanleukemic cells. Blood 64: 54-58, 1984[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Spriggs D, Robbins G, Mitchell T, et al: Incorporation of 9-ß-D-arabinofuranosyl-2-fluoroadenine into HL-60 cellular DNA and RNA. Biochem Pharmacol 35: 247-252, 1986[Medline]

38. Huang P, Chubb S, Plunkett W: Termination of DNA synthesis by 9-ß-D-arabinofuranosyl-2-fluoroadenine 5'-triphosphate: A mechanism of toxicity. J Biol Chem 265: 16617-16625, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Huang P, Chubb S, Hertel LW, et al: Actions of 2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine on DNA synthesis. Cancer Res 51: 6110-6117, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Rodriguez CO Jr, Gandhi V: Arabinosylguanine-induced apoptosis of T-lymphoblastic cells: Incorporation into DNA is a necessary step. Cancer Res 59: 4937-4943, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Ono K, Ohashi A, Yamamoto A, et al: Inhibitory effects of 9-ß-D-arabinofuranosylguanine 5'-triphosphate and 9-ß-D-arabinofuranosyladenine 5'-triphosphate on DNA polymerases from murine cells and oncornavirus. Cancer Res 39: 4673-4680, 1979[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Gandhi V, Mineishi S, Huang P, et al: Cytotoxicity, metabolism, and mechanisms of action of 2',2'-difluorodeoxyguanosine in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Cancer Res 55: 1517-1524, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]

43. Gandhi V, Mineishi S, Huang P, et al: Difluorodeoxyguanosine: Cytotoxicity, metabolism, and actions on DNA synthesis in human leukemia cells. Semin Oncol 22: 61-67, 1995[Medline]

44. Plunkett W, Huang P, Gandhi V: Metabolism and action of fludarabine. Semin Oncol 17: 3-17, 1990 (suppl 5)[Medline]

Submitted September 20, 2000; accepted January 17, 2001.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
V. Gandhi, C. Tam, S. O'Brien, R. C. Jewell, C. O. Rodriguez Jr, S. Lerner, W. Plunkett, and M. J. Keating
Phase I Trial of Nelarabine in Indolent Leukemias
J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2008; 26(7): 1098 - 1105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. H. Cohen, J. R. Johnson, T. Massie, R. Sridhara, W. D. McGuinn Jr., S. Abraham, B. P. Booth, M. A. Goheer, D. Morse, X. H. Chen, et al.
Approval summary: nelarabine for the treatment of T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma.
Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2006; 12(18): 5329 - 5335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
D. F Kisor
Nelarabine: A Nucleoside Analog with Efficacy in T-Cell and Other Leukemias
Ann. Pharmacother., June 1, 2005; 39(6): 1056 - 1063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. Kurtzberg, T.J. Ernst, M.J. Keating, V. Gandhi, J.P. Hodge, D.F. Kisor, J.J. Lager, C. Stephens, J. Levin, T. Krenitsky, et al.
Phase I Study of 506U78 Administered on a Consecutive 5-Day Schedule in Children and Adults With Refractory Hematologic Malignancies
J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2005; 23(15): 3396 - 3403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
S. Faderl, V. Gandhi, S. O'Brien, P. Bonate, J. Cortes, E. Estey, M. Beran, W. Wierda, G. Garcia-Manero, A. Ferrajoli, et al.
Results of a phase 1-2 study of clofarabine in combination with cytarabine (ara-C) in relapsed and refractory acute leukemias
Blood, February 1, 2005; 105(3): 940 - 947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. Herling, J. D. Khoury, L. T. Washington, M. Duvic, M. J. Keating, and D. Jones
A systematic approach to diagnosis of mature T-cell leukemias reveals heterogeneity among WHO categories
Blood, July 15, 2004; 104(2): 328 - 335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
V. Gandhi, H. Kantarjian, S. Faderl, P. Bonate, M. Du, M. Ayres, M. B. Rios, M. J. Keating, and W. Plunkett
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Plasma Clofarabine and Cellular Clofarabine Triphosphate in Patients with Acute Leukemias
Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2003; 9(17): 6335 - 6342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
H. Kantarjian, V. Gandhi, J. Cortes, S. Verstovsek, M. Du, G. Garcia-Manero, F. Giles, S. Faderl, S. O'Brien, S. Jeha, et al.
Phase 2 clinical and pharmacologic study of clofarabine in patients with refractory or relapsed acute leukemia
Blood, October 1, 2003; 102(7): 2379 - 2386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
C. O. Rodriguez Jr, C. M. Stellrecht, and V. Gandhi
Mechanisms for T-cell selective cytotoxicity of arabinosylguanine
Blood, September 1, 2003; 102(5): 1842 - 1848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. O. Rodriguez Jr., B. S. Mitchell, M. Ayres, S. Eriksson, and V. Gandhi
Arabinosylguanine Is Phosphorylated by Both Cytoplasmic Deoxycytidine Kinase and Mitochondrial Deoxyguanosine Kinase
Cancer Res., June 1, 2002; 62(11): 3100 - 3105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow