Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gohji, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nakajima, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gohji, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nakajima, M.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 18, Issue 16 (August), 2000: 2963-2971
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Oncology

Independent Prognostic Value of Serum Hepatocyte Growth Factor in Bladder Cancer

By Kazuo Gohji, Masashi Nomi, Yoshiyuki Niitani, Sohei Kitazawa, Akio Fujii, Yoji Katsuoka, Motowo Nakajima

From the Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki; Department of Urology, Hyogo Medical Center for Adults, Akashi; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Tokushima; Department of Pathology, Kobe University School of Medicine, Kobe; and Biology Research, Tsukuba Research Institute Novartis Pharmaceuticals K.K., Tsukuba, Japan.

Address reprint requests to Kazuo Gohji, MD, PhD, Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, 2–7 Daigakumatchi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686 Japan; email uro009{at}poh.osaka-med.ac.jp


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PURPOSE: We retrospectively investigated whether the level of serum hepatocyte growth factor could predict the prognosis and extent of transitional-cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serum samples were collected from 113 patients with bladder cancer and from 200 healthy controls. Of the 113 patients, 59 had superficial bladder cancer and 54 had muscle-invasive cancer. Thirteen bladder cancer tissues (eight superficial and five muscle-invasive) were also collected. The levels of hepatocyte growth factor in the serum and tissues of these individuals were measured by enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assay using hepatocyte growth factor antibodies.

RESULTS: The levels of hepatocyte growth factor in the serum and tissues of patients with muscle-invasive cancer were significantly higher than those of patients with superficial bladder cancer (P < .0001 and P = .0054, respectively). The degree of elevation above the normal level of serum hepatocyte growth factor of the former (61.1%) was significantly higher than that of the latter (8.4%; P < .0001). The elevation was highest in patients with visceral metastasis (93.3%). Among patients with superficial bladder cancer, the overall survival rate of those with low levels of serum hepatocyte growth factor was significantly greater than that of those with high levels (P = .005). Among patients with minimally invasive bladder cancer, the disease-free and overall survival rates of those with high levels of serum hepatocyte growth factor were significantly lower than the same rates of those with low levels (P < .001 and P = .0028, respectively).

CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the level of hepatocyte growth factor in serum could be a predictor of patient survival and extent of bladder cancer.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
BLADDER CANCER IS the fourth most common malignant tumor in men and the eighth most common cancer in women in the United States.1 Approximately 70% to 80% of bladder cancers are superficial, whereas the remainder are muscle-invasive or metastatic cancers. Several prognostic factors and predictors of disease extension in bladder cancer tissue and urine have been reported.2-4 Bladder cancer patients who exhibit high expression of autocrine motility factor receptors have significantly lower survival rates than patients with low expression.2 Superficial bladder cancers with high expression of vascular endothelial growth factor demonstrate significantly higher rates of progression than those with low expression.3 The sensitivities of nuclear matrix protein in urine for recurrence of superficial and invasive tumors are 71% and 100%, respectively.4 We have previously reported that the ratio of serum matrix metalloproteinase-2 to tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase-2 is a useful predictor of postoperative recurrence of urothelial cancer.5 There are no useful serum markers, however, for predicting disease extension of bladder cancer or the overall survival of such patients. Therefore, the uncovering of new prognostic serum markers for determining disease extent and disease-free and overall survival of patients with bladder cancer has long been aspired to. Such markers would be conducive to the selection of patients who require adjuvant therapy after resection.

The hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) stimulates cell motility and epithelial morphogenesis.6-9 This growth factor also induces proliferation of vascular endothelial cells through a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor encoded by a proto-oncogene, c-met, which leads to induction of angiogenesis.9-11 Moreover, levels of HGF in urine and tissue of muscle-invasive bladder cancer have been found to be higher than those in superficial bladder cancer.11,12 The serum levels of HGF in bladder cancer patients, however, have not been determined, and the relationship between serum HGF levels and the extent of bladder cancer and that between serum HGF level and tissue HGF level are not known. In the present study, we examined the relationship between the levels of HGF in serum and tissue of bladder cancer patients and evaluated the efficacy of serum HGF levels in predicting patient survival and the extent of transitional-cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder.


    PATIENTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patient Characteristics and Serum Collection
Serum was collected between May 1985 and December 1997 at Hyogo Medical Center for Adults from 113 patients (aged 49 to 89 years; median age, 61; 84 men and 29 women) with transitional-cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder before treatment and from 200 healthy controls (aged 42 to 78 years; median age, 58 years; 90 men and 110 women). The serum samples were stored at -20°C until assayed. Before collection of serum from patients and healthy controls, their informed consent for the use of the samples in future experimentation was obtained. Details of the bladder cancer patients are summarized in Table 1.. Tumor stage and tumor differentiation were determined by the International Union Against Cancer–tumor-node-metastasis system and the World Health Organization classification, respectively. Of the 59 patients with superficial bladder cancer (<= pT1), three had regional lymph node metastases. Of the 54 patients with muscle-invasive cancer (>= pT2), 31 had no metastasis (pT2, 14 patients; pT3, 17) and 23 had metastasis (pT2, one patient; pT3, 13; pT4, seven; pTx, two). Of these 23 patients, lymph node metastasis alone was found in eight and visceral metastasis with or without lymph node metastasis in 15 (pulmonary metastasis alone in five patients, pulmonary and lymph node metastases in five, pulmonary, bone, and lymph node metastases in five). All bladder cancer patients who enrolled onto the present study exhibited no clinically malignant disease other than bladder cancer.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Serum HGF Levels in Healthy Controls and Bladder Cancer Patients
 
Tissue Collection
Thirteen bladder cancer tissues were obtained at total cystectomy or endoscopic transurethral resection between July 1997 and December 1997 after obtaining patient consent for the use of the samples in future experimentation. Tumors were at stages pTa (four patients), pT1 (four), pT2 (one), pT3 (two), and pT4 (two) and were at grade 1 (one), grade 2 (five), and grade 3 (seven). Lymph node metastasis was detected in two patients, and both visceral and lymph node metastases were detected in two others. All tissues were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until use.

Enzyme Immunoassay
The level of HGF in serum samples was determined with an HGF–enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assay kit (Otsuka Assay Laboratories, Tokushima, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and was measurable in the range of 0.01 to 10.00 ng/mL. In brief, the enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assay Microtiter 96–well plates were coated with 100 µL of 2 µg/mL antihuman HGF mouse monoclonal antibody (Otsuka Assay Laboratories) for 12 hours at 4°C. The plates were washed three times with 0.05% Tween-20 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and blocked with 300 µL of 1% bovine serum albumin in PBS for 12 hours at 4°C, and then, 50 µL of PBS and 50 µL of standard HGF or serum samples were dispensed into the wells. The plates were sealed and incubated for 1 hour at 20°C to 30°C and then washed five times. After the addition of 100 µL antihuman HGF rabbit polyclonal antibody (Otsuka Assay Laboratories) diluted to 1:8,000, the plates were sealed and incubated for 1hour at 20°C to 30°C and washed five times, and 100 µL horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) diluted to 1:3,000 was added before the plates were incubated for 1 hour at 20°C to 30°C; after five washes, 100 µL of 0.25% ortho-phenylene diamine was added. The reaction was stopped after 10 minutes by adding 100 µL of 1.0N H2SO4. The absorbance was read at 492 nm, with a reference wavelength of 690 nm by a microplate reader (Model E-max, Molecular Devices, CA). The serum HGF levels in normal healthy controls and bladder cancer patients were determined, and the relationship between the level and the extent of the disease was examined.

The amounts of HGF in bladder cancer tissue were determined by a modified method of Rosen et al12 In brief, to prepare extracts, the tissues were thawed, washed, cut into small pieces, and homogenized in tissue extraction buffer (Mg2+, Ca2+ free Doulbeco’s PBS, 0.1 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). The homogenized tissue was sonicated in an ice water bath and then clarified by microcentrifuging. The extracts were assayed for HGF by enzyme immunoassay and for protein by a Bio-Rad protein assay kid (Bio-Rad Laboratories). The correlation between serum HGF levels and amounts of HGF in the tissues was determined by Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

Follow-Up Protocol for Recurrence in Patients With Superficial and Invasive Cancer After Surgery
Patients with superficial bladder cancer who underwent transurethral resection and those who underwent partial cystectomy were examined for intravesical recurrence by cystoscopy every 3 months for the period of 2 years; patients who underwent radical or partial cystectomy were examined for recurrence of cancer by computed tomographic scans, chest x-rays, and laboratory tests every 3 months for a period of 3 years; thereafter, the examinations for these groups were carried out at 6-month intervals for 5 years from the date of surgery. The examinations were continued beyond 5 years if the patient so desired. When patients presented with bone pain or neurologic symptoms, bone scintigraphy or brain computed tomographic scan was carried out. After surgery, no adjuvant therapy was provided. Patients in whom the cancer recurred and patients with metastasis who could not undergo resection, however, received multidrug chemotherapy that included cisplatinum every 4 weeks until disease progression.

Relationship Between Serum HGF and Patient Clinical Course
In seven bladder cancer patients who did not have metastasis and who underwent radical cystectomy, serum HGF levels were measured before and 4 weeks after surgery, and the relationship between the levels and the patient clinical course was retrospectively investigated. Moreover, in another nine patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy, the serum HGF level was measured when the recurrence was detected by x-ray examination; the relationship between the level and recurrence was also retrospectively examined.

Disease-Free and Overall Survival of Patients With Multistage Bladder Cancer
Of 59 patients with superficial bladder cancer who underwent transurethral resection, the disease-free and overall survival of 56 patients (40 men and 16 women; aged 49 to 87 years; median age, 66 years; 13 aged < 61 years and 43 aged >= 61 years; pTis, two; pTa, 17; pT1, 37; grade 1, 19; grade 2, 28; and grade 3, nine) without lymph node metastasis were determined according to serum HGF levels. Of 57 patients (54 with muscle-invasive bladder cancer and three with pT1 and with regional lymph node metastasis), 40 (32 men [80%] and eight women [20%] aged between 49 and 89 years; median age, 69 years; 12 aged < 61 years [30%] and 28 aged >= 61 years [70%]) with minimally invasive tumors (<= pT3N0-1M0) underwent curative radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Pathologically, the surgical margin was confirmed negative for cancer cells, which indicated curative resection. The pathologic stage of the tumors was pT2N0M0 in 14 patients (35%), pT3N0M0 in 17 (42.5%), pT1N1M0 in two (5.0%), and pT3N1M0 in seven (17.5%). Tumors were grade 2 in 17 patients (42.5%) and grade 3 in 23 (57.5%). Lymphatic involvement was detected in nine (22.5%) of the 40 patients. The disease-free and overall survival rates of these 40 patients were retrospectively determined according to their preoperative serum HGF levels.

The disease-free and overall survival rates of 15 patients with visceral metastasis and seven patients with pT4 disease according to their serum HGF levels, however, could not be statistically analyzed, because only one patient had visceral metastasis and a normal serum HGF level; the remaining patients showed elevated serum HGF levels. Moreover, patients with extensively invasive bladder cancer (T4 or >= N2) or distant metastasis did not undergo curative resection. Thus, these patients were excluded from this analysis.

Statistics
Statistical analysis was carried out with the SAS software package (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC). Data were analyzed by nonparametric tests. Among the subjects, differences in serum HGF levels were determined by the Mann-Whitney U test, and the differences in elevation of serum HGF was determined by the {chi}2 test; among patients with tumors of different grades, however, differences of serum HGF levels and the elevation were determined by analysis of variance. The disease-free and overall survival rates of patients with minimal locally-invasive bladder cancer, who underwent curative resection, were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference was determined by the log-rank test. Disease-free survival was defined as the period between surgery and the detection of the first local recurrence or distant metastasis or the end of the study. Overall survival was defined as the period from surgery to the patient’s death. Factors related to disease-free and overall survival in patients who underwent curative resection were analyzed by Cox’s proportional hazards regression model.13 P values less than .05 were considered significant.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Serum Levels of HGF
Serum HGF levels are listed in Table 1. The mean ± SD value in normal healthy controls was 0.19 ± 0.05 ng/mL (range, 0.08 to 0.38 ng/mL). There was no significant difference in levels between male and female subjects of any age group (data not shown). In patients with superficial bladder cancer (mean ± SD, 0.29 ± 0.10 ng/mL), the levels were significantly higher than those in healthy controls (P = .001). In patients with muscle invasion, they were far higher than those in patients with superficial bladder cancer (P < .0001). The levels differed significantly among patients with tumors of different grades (P < .0003); the average level in patients with grade 3 tumors was higher than in patients with tumors of grade 1 or 2. In patients with vascular or lymphatic involvement, they were also much higher than those in patients without such involvement (P < .0001). Moreover, in patients with lymph node or visceral metastasis, the levels were significantly higher than those in patients without metastasis (P < .0001). In particular, patients with multiple lung metastases had higher levels than patients with metastases other than lung (median, 0.50 ng/mL; range, 0.30 to 1.23 ng/mL).

Statistical Determination of Elevation of Serum HGF
The upper limit of the normal level of serum HGF was determined as the mean + 4SD of that in normal healthy controls, the cutoff value being 0.39 ng/mL. The elevation of the serum HGF level in each group of patients is demonstrated in Table 1. In patients with superficial bladder cancer, it was significantly higher than in healthy controls (P = .0005). In patients with muscle-invasive cancer, it was significantly greater than in patients with superficial cancer (61.1% v 8.4%; P < .0001). In patients with muscle-invasive or high-grade (grade 3) tumors, the elevation was also significantly greater than that in patients with superficial or low-grade (grade 1 or 2) tumors, respectively (P < .0001). The elevation in patients with vascular or lymphatic involvement was significantly higher than that in patients without such involvement (P < .0001). In patients with metastasis, it was also greater than in patients without metastasis (P < .0001).

Amounts of HGF in Bladder Cancer Tissues
The amount of HGF in bladder cancer tissue is listed in Table 2. The mean ± SD amount of HGF in muscle-invasive cancer (0.34 ± 0.18 ng/mg) was significantly higher than in superficial cancer (0.07 ± 0.06 ng/mg; P = .0054). Moreover, the mean amount in high-grade cancer (grade 3) was significantly higher than in low-grade cancer (grade 1 or 2; P = .0223). The value in metastatic cancer also was significantly higher than in nonmetastatic cancer (P = .0206). The correlation between serum HGF level and the amount of tissue HGF in the same patients was linear (r = .927) and significant (P = .0072) (Fig 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Content of Tissue Hepatocyte Growth Factor in Bladder Cancer Tissue
 


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. The relationship between serum HGF levels and the amount of tissue HGF in bladder cancer.

 
Relationship Between Serum HGF Levels and Patients’ Clinical Course
The serum HGF levels in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer without metastasis, measured before and after total cystectomy in all seven patients, decreased after cystectomy (Fig 2A). The relationship between serum HGF level and recurrence is shown in Fig 2B. The site of recurrence was the lung alone in three patients, local recurrence in one, lymph node in 2, and lung, lymph node, and bone in three. The serum HGF level in eight of nine patients increased in association with disease recurrence; it showed no increase in the remaining one patient with lymph node recurrence.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. (A) Relationship between serum HGF level and clinical course of bladder cancer in patients who underwent radical cystectomy. (B) Relationship between serum HGF level and clinical course in bladder cancer patients in whom the cancer recurred. Dashed lines indicate normal value of serum HGF (0.39 ng/mL).

 
Recurrence-Free and Overall Survival of Superficial Bladder Cancer According to Serum HGF Levels
The disease-free and overall survival of 56 patients with superficial bladder cancer without lymph node metastasis according to serum HGF levels are shown in Fig 3. Among patients with high serum HGF levels (>= 0.39 ng/mL), the 1- and 3-year disease-free survival rates were 100% and 55%, respectively (Fig 3A); among those with low serum HGF levels (< 0.39 ng/mL), on the other hand, they were 92% and 70%, respectively. There was no significant difference in disease-free survival between patients with low and those with high serum HGF levels (P = .674). Of five cases with high serum HGF level, two patients (40%) died of bladder cancer at 17 and 24 months after surgery. Of 51 patients with low serum HGF levels, however, only three (4.8%) died of myocardial infarction 5, 63, and 90 months after surgery with no evidence of disease. The 1- and 3-year overall survival rates of patients with low serum HGF levels were significantly higher than those of patients with high serum HGF levels (98% v 100% and 98% v 55%, respectively; P = .005) (Fig 3B).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. (A) Disease-free survival of patients with superficial bladder cancer (pTa+1N0M0) who underwent transurethral resection. (B) Overall survival of patients with superficial bladder cancer (pTa+1N0M0) who underwent transurethral resection.

 
Disease-Free and Overall Survival of Minimally Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients Who Underwent Curative Resection
The 1- and 3-year disease-free survival rates of the 27 patients with high levels of serum HGF (>=0.39 ng/mL) were significantly lower (62.0% and 29.8%, respectively) than those of 13 patients with low levels of serum HGF (< 0.39 ng/mL; 100% and 89.0%, respectively; P < .001) (Fig 4A). The overall survival rates of the 27 patients were significantly lower than those of the 13 patients (P = .0028); the 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were 75.0% and 31.0%, respectively, for patients with high levels of serum HGF and 100% and 89.9%, respectively, for patients with low levels (Fig 4B).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. (A) Disease-free survival of minimally invasive bladder cancer patients who underwent curative resection. (B) Overall survival of minimally invasive bladder cancer patients who underwent curative resection. One patient with elevated serum HGF had recurrence approximately 8 years after surgery; however, this patient was alive with no evidence of disease 13 years after surgery followed up by cytotoxic chemotherapy.

 
Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Disease-Free and Overall Survival in Superficial and Minimally Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients Who Underwent Curative Resection
The serum HGF level was not a significant prognostic factor for disease-free survival of patients with superficial bladder cancer that involved pT stage, grade, or lymphatic involvement (Table 3). It was, however, a significant prognostic factor for only overall survival in patients with superficial bladder cancer on univariate analysis (P = .0326) (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Prognostic Factors of Disease-Free and Overall Survival in Patients With Superficial Bladder Cancer, by Univariate and Multivariate Analyses
 
On the other hand, univariate analysis demonstrated that serum HGF level (P = .0091 and P = .0149), pT stage (P = .0163 and P = .0245), and vascular involvement (P = .0140 and P = .0170) were all significant prognostic factors for disease-free and overall survival, respectively, in minimally invasive bladder cancer (Table 4). Only the serum HGF level (P = .0162) was found to be a significant independent factor of disease-free survival on multivariate analysis. On the other hand, the serum HGF level (P = .0282) and vascular involvement (P = .0497) were found to be significant independent prognostic factors for overall survival on multivariate analysis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Prognostic Factors of Disease-Free and Overall Survival in Patients With Minimally-Invasive Bladder Cancer, by Univariate and Multivariate Analyses
 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Metastatic lesions are established in multiple steps.14 During these steps, several growth factors and cytokines regulate tumor invasion, motility, and angiogenesis via extracellular matrix degradative enzymes.15,16 HGF also stimulates invasion of tumor cells in vitro and induces angiogenesis in vivo.6-10 Breast cancer patients with a high HGF content in cancer tissue have significantly shorter relapse-free and overall survival than patients with a low HGF content.17 Lung cancer patients with higher levels of HGF in their tissue have poorer overall survival than patients with lower HGF levels.18 Also, multivariate analysis has demonstrated that tissue HGF level is a strong independently negative prognostic factor for patients with non–small-cell lung cancer, which suggests that the HGF level in cancer tissue could be a useful indicator of risk of relapse and death in patients with early-stage lung cancer.18 Furthermore, elevated serum HGF level has been found in patients with other types of neoplasia, including gastric cancer and multiple myeloma, which suggests that it is associated with disease progression.19,20 Circulating levels of HGF are elevated in one third of patients with gastric cancer, particularly in those with high grades of histologic tumor invasion and metastasis.19 Taniguchi et al19 have therefore postulated that HGF might play an important role in the progression of gastric cancer. The serum HGF level is elevated in 43% of patients with multiple myeloma, evincing poor prognosis; therefore, serum HGF level could also be a useful prognostic factor of multiple myeloma.20

In the present study, serum HGF levels in more advanced bladder cancer were significantly higher than those in low-stage cancer; in particular, the levels in patients whose cancer had metastasized were significantly higher than those in patients whose tumor had not metastasized. The levels decreased after cystectomy and increased with recurrence. Therefore, the major source of elevated serum HGF level could be the tumor itself. The amounts of HGF in muscle-invasive, high-grade or lymph node metastatic bladder cancer tissues were significantly higher than those in superficial, low-grade or nonmetastatic tissue, and serum HGF levels correlated well with the amounts of tissue HGF. Thus, our results indicate that serum HGF titers tend to reflect disease activity and that particularly high serum and tissue titers of HGF are found in muscle-invasive or metastatic cancers.

Overall survival of patients with superficial bladder cancer with low serum HGF levels was significantly higher than that of patients with high levels; however, the disease-free survival was not significantly different between the two groups. The serum HGF level was a significant prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with superficial bladder cancer. Moreover, in cases of minimally invasive bladder cancer in which curative resection was carried out, the prognosis of patients with high levels of serum HGF was significantly more unfavorable than that of patients with low levels. The traditional prognostic factors for bladder cancer are pT, tumor grade, and metastasis.21 Multivariate analysis in our study, however, demonstrated that the serum HGF level was a significant prognostic factor for both disease-free and overall survival of patients who had minimally invasive bladder cancer and who underwent curative resection. On the other hand, pT, tumor grade, and lymph node metastasis seemed not to be significant as prognostic factors. The reason for the discrepancy between our observations and those of previous reports is unclear; however, a possible explanation is that only minimally invasive bladder cancers were used in our multivariate analysis, whereas patients with both extensive invasion and extensive lymph node metastasis (T4 or >= N2) and distant metastasis were excluded because they had elevated serum HGF levels and they did not undergo curative resection. The present findings support the hypothesis that elevated serum HGF level correlates with progression of bladder cancer and may suggest an unfavorable prognosis in superficial and minimally invasive bladder cancer. HGF levels might thus predict the degree of tumor cell invasion and metastasis and, hence, prognosis.

HGF, occasionally detected in various tissues, is exclusively in the inactive single-chain pro-HGF form, and native HGF is secreted by cells as a pro-HGF form; moreover, processing pro-HGF to form active heterodimers is necessary for HGF to fully activate the HGF receptor and to induce biologic responses in target cells.22 Three converting enzymes have been described in serum and tissues, including blood coagulation factor XIIa, HGF activator, and urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA).22,23 In human bladder cancer tissue, the uPA level correlates well with tumor invasive and metastatic potential, the uPA content of high-grade transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder is significantly higher than that of low-grade cancer, and the level of uPA in tumor tissue seems to be a significant prognostic factor.24 These findings suggest that both uPA and pro-HGF may be highly expressed in high-grade and advanced bladder tumors and that the serum level of HGF is, therefore, elevated in patients with such tumors, which results in tumor progression and poor prognosis. Moreover, HGF is a growth factor that shows biologic activities through a receptor (c-met); bladder cancer tissue with great amounts of HGF also shows high expression of c-met.11,25 On the other hand, the expression of c-met is found more often in metastatic prostatic carcinoma than in nonmetastatic tumors.26 HGF and c-met may operate in a paracrine manner in influencing prostatic carcinoma cell behavior, including cell proliferation and scattering, and c-met expression may be associated with prostatic carcinoma progression.26 Because the present study focused on determining serum HGF levels as a prognostic factor of bladder cancer, the expression of c-met in bladder cancer tissues was not examined.

In conclusion, among all bladder cancer patients, those with metastatic bladder cancer had the highest levels of HGF in serum and tissues. The serum HGF levels correlated well with the amounts of tissue HGF. Patients with minimally invasive bladder cancer and high serum HGF levels had short disease-free and overall survival after curative resection. Moreover, the overall survival of patients with superficial bladder cancer and high serum HGF was also short. These findings suggest that the HGF level in serum could be a predictor of patient survival and the extent of bladder cancer.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
1. Wingo PA, Tong T, Bolden S, et al: Cancer statistics, 1995. CA Cancer J Clin 45:8-30, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Korman HJ, Peabody JO, Cerny JC, et al: Autocrine motility factor receptor as a possible urine marker for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol 155:347-349, 1997

3. Crew JP, O’Brien T, Bradburn M, et al: Vascular endothelial growth factor is a predictor of relapse and stage progression in superficial bladder cancer. Cancer Res 57:5281-5285, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Soloway MS, Briggman JV, Carpinito GA, et al: Use of a new tumor marker, urinary NMP 22, in the detection of occult or rapidly recurring transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract following surgical treatment. J Urol 156:363-367, 1996[Medline]

5. Gohji K, Fujimoto N, Fujii A, et al: Prognostic significance of circulating matrix mertalloproteinase-2 to tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 ratio in recurrence of urothelial cancer after complete resection. Cancer Res 56:3196-3198, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Rubin JS, Chan AML, Bottaro DP, et al: A broad-spectrum human lung fibroblast-derived mitogen is a variant of hepatocyte growth factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88:415-419, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Stoker M, Gherardi E, Perryman M, et al: Scatter factor is a fibroblast-derived modulator of epithelial cell motility. Nature 327:239-242, 1987[Medline]

8. Grant DS, Kleinman HK, Goldberg ID, et al: Scatter factor induces blood vessel formation in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90:1937-1941, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Tsarfaty I, Resau JH, Rulong SL, et al: The met proto-oncogene receptor and lumen formation. Science 257:1258-1260, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Bottaro DP, Rubin JS, Faletto DL, et al: Identification of the hepatocyte growth factor receptor as the c-met proto-oncogene product. Science 251:802-804, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Joseph A, Weiss GH, Jin L, et al: Expression of scatter factor in human bladder carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:372-377, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Rosen EM, Joseph A, Jin L, et al: Urinary and tissue levels of scatter factor in transitional cell carcinoma of bladder. J Urol 157:72-78, 1997[Medline]

13. Cox DR: Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc 34:187-220, 1972

14. Fidler IJ: Critical factors in the biology of human cancer metastasis: Twenty-eighth G.H.A. Clowes Memorial Award Lecture. Cancer Res 50:6130-6138, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Gohji K, Nakajima M, Fabra A, et al: Regulation of gelatinase production in metastatic renal cell carcinoma by organ-specific fibroblasts. Jpn J Cancer Res 85:152-160, 1994[Medline]

16. Gohji K, Nakajima M, Boyd D, et al: Organ-site dependence for the production of urokinase-type plasminogen activator and metastasis by human renal cell carcinoma cells. Am J Pathol 151:1655-1661, 1997[Abstract]

17. Yamashita J, Ogawa M, Yamashita S, et al: Immunoreactive hepatocyte growth factor is a strong and independent predictor of recurrence and survival in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 54:1630-1633, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Siegfried JM, Weissfeld LA, Singh-Kaw P, et al: Association of immunoreactive hepatocyte growth factor with poor survival in resectable non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res 57:433-439, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Taniguchi T, Kitamura M, Arai K, et al: Increase in the circulating level of hepatocyte growth factor in gastric cancer patients. Br J Cancer 75:673-677, 1997[Medline]

20. Seidel C, Borset M, Turesson I, et al: Elevated serum concentrations of hepatocyte growth factor in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 91:806-812, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Pagano F, Bassi P, Galetti TP, et al: Results of contemporary radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer: A clinicopathological study with an emphasis on the inadequacy of the tumor, nodes and metastases classification. J Urol 145:45-50, 1991[Medline]

22. Naldini L, Tamagnone L, Vigna E, et al: Extracellular proteolytic cleavage by urokinase is required for activation of hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor. EMBO J 11:4825-4833, 1992[Medline]

23. Shimomura T, Miyazawa K, Komiyama Y, et al: Activation of hepatocyte growth factor by two homologous proteases, blood-coagulation factor XIIa and hepatocyte growth factor activator. Eur J Biochem 229:257-261, 1995[Medline]

24. Hasui Y, Marutsuka K, Suzumiya J, et al: The content of urokinase-type plasminogen activator antigen as a prognostic factor in urinary bladder cancer. Int J Cancer 50:871-873, 1992[Medline]

25. Tamatani T, Hattori K, Iyer A, et al: Hepatocyte growth factor is an invasion/migration factor of rat urothelial carcinoma cells in vitro. Carcinogenesis 20:957-962, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Humphrey PA, Zhu X, Zarnegar R, et al: Hepatocyte growth factor and its receptor (c-MET) in prostatic carcinoma. Am J Pathol 147:386-396, 1995[Abstract]

Submitted July 2, 1999; accepted April 20, 2000.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. Allen, S. Duffy, T. Teknos, M. Islam, Z. Chen, P. S. Albert, G. Wolf, and C. Van Waes
Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B-Related Serum Factors as Longitudinal Biomarkers of Response and Survival in Advanced Oropharyngeal Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2007; 13(11): 3182 - 3190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Ren, B. Cao, S. Law, Y. Xie, P. Y. Lee, L. Cheung, Y. Chen, X. Huang, H. M. Chan, P. Zhao, et al.
Hepatocyte Growth Factor Promotes Cancer Cell Migration and Angiogenic Factors Expression: A Prognostic Marker of Human Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomas
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2005; 11(17): 6190 - 6197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Boorjian, S. K. Tickoo, N. P. Mongan, H. Yu, D. Bok, R. R. Rando, D. M. Nanus, D. S. Scherr, and L. J. Gudas
Reduced Lecithin: Retinol Acyltransferase Expression Correlates with Increased Pathologic Tumor Stage in Bladder Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2004; 10(10): 3429 - 3437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
P. Champelovier, A. Simon, C. Garrel, G. Levacher, V. Praloran, and D. Seigneurin
Is Interferon {gamma} One Key of Metastatic Potential Increase in Human Bladder Carcinoma?
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2003; 9(12): 4562 - 4569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
S. Hara, H. Miyake, M. Fujisawa, H. Okada, S. Arakawa, S. Kamidono, and I. Hara
Prognostic Variables in Patients Who Have Undergone Radical Cystectomy for Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2001; 31(8): 399 - 402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gohji, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nakajima, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gohji, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nakajima, M.

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online