Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pandha, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lemoine, N. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pandha, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lemoine, N. R.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 17, Issue 7 (July), 1999: 2180
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Oncology

Genetic Prodrug Activation Therapy for Breast Cancer: A Phase I Clinical Trial of erbB-2–Directed Suicide Gene Expression

Hardev S. Pandha, Lesley-Ann Martin, Anne Rigg, Helen C. Hurst, Gordon W.H. Stamp, Karol Sikora, Nicholas R. Lemoine

From the Imperial Cancer Research Fund Molecular Oncology Unit and Departments of Cancer Medicine and Histopathology, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Campus, London, United Kingdom.

Address reprint requests to Nicholas R. Lemoine, MD, Imperial Cancer Research Fund Molecular Oncology Unit, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Campus, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom; email: n.lemoine{at}icrf.icnet.uk


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PURPOSE: This trial was designed to test the safety and efficacy of a tumor-specific genetic prodrug activation therapy targeted by use of the human erbB-2 gene promoter. The erbB-2 oncogene is overexpressed in approximately 20% of cases of breast cancer and is associated with poor prognosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve breast cancer patients received transcriptionally targeted gene therapy in a phase I clinical trial using direct intratumoral injection of plasmid construct combined with systemic administration of prodrug. The genetic prodrug activation therapy is specifically targeted to erbB-2–overexpressing breast cancer cells by use of a therapeutic cassette that contains the Escherichia coli cytosine deaminase gene driven by the tumor-specific erbB-2 promoter, thus allowing activation of fluorocytosine to the active cytotoxic fluorouracil only within tumor cells that express the oncogene.

RESULTS: The approach was shown to be safe and to result in targeted gene expression in up to 90% of cases. Using a number of different assays, we demonstrated that significant levels of expression of the suicide gene were specifically restricted to erbB-2–positive tumor cells, confirming the selectivity of the approach.

CONCLUSION: The results of this study, the first targeted gene therapy for breast cancer and the first to use the cytosine deaminase system in human subjects, are encouraging for the development of genetic prodrug activation therapies that exploit the transcriptional profile of cancer cells.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
ALTHOUGH A SIGNIFICANT number of new anticancer agents have been developed and there has been some improvement in the overall survival rate for patients with breast cancer, the life expectancy for patients who develop metastases is limited. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop novel systemic strategies for this major health problem. These strategies may be offered to patients to treat advanced disease that is resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy and may play an important role in improving adjuvant therapy for more limited disease. The challenge is to enhance the selectivity of systemic therapy so that tumor response is increased without undue toxicity to normal tissue.

Genetic prodrug activation therapy (GPAT) uses transcriptional differences between normal and neoplastic cells to drive the selective expression of a metabolic "suicide gene" that is able to convert a nontoxic prodrug into its toxic metabolite. Genetically modified cells that express the nonmammalian enzyme cytosine deaminase (CD) gene are able to convert the nontoxic prodrug fluorocytosine (5-FC) to the toxic metabolite fluorouracil (5-FU), which inhibits RNA and DNA synthesis during the S phase of the cell cycle.1,2 Here we describe a transcriptionally targeted tumor-specific GPAT strategy using this system in patients with erbB-2–overexpressing breast cancer.

Overexpression of erbB-2 is observed in approximately 20% of breast carcinomas and is associated with reduced relapse-free and overall patient survival.3 High erbB-2 receptor levels have been shown to correlate with poor prognosis in patients with nodal metastases of their breast cancer, and there is a trend toward shorter survival in node-negative disease.4-8 erbB-2 status has also been found to be predictive of resistance to endocrine and cytotoxic therapies.9-11 Overexpression of erbB-2 in breast cancer is a result of both increased gene transcription and gene amplification. The activity of the erbB-2 promoter is enhanced in overexpressing cells through binding of members of the AP-2 family of transcription factors to a response element within the proximal promoter. We have shown previously that a 500–base pair (bp) fragment of the proximal promoter (containing the AP-2 binding site) driving the CD gene resulted in levels of CD expression and cell death (upon exposure to 5-FC) directly proportional to the erbB-2 status of the cells when transduced into a panel of breast and pancreatic tumor cell lines using a retroviral vector.12

We now report an evaluation of intratumoral injection of a plasmid (pERCY) containing the same proximal erbB-2 promoter fragment/CD chimera and systemic infusion of the prodrug 5-FC. We conducted a study of 12 patients to assess the safety of the approach, the efficiency of in vivo gene transfer, and the functional expression of the suicide enzyme, and to find direct evidence of local antitumor activity in human tumor nodules caused by activation of 5-FC to 5-FU. The results show that the approach is safe, and expression of the therapeutic construct is observed in the majority of injected nodules. Expression at the mRNA and protein levels is detected in 10% to 85% of erbB-2–positive tumor cells, whereas no expression is evident in normal local epithelial and stromal tissues.


    PATIENTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Clinical Protocol
Twelve postmenopausal women with multiple well-demarcated, nonulcerating skin metastases less than 2 cm in diameter were recruited from a number of clinical centers in the United Kingdom. Before receiving any form of experimental therapy, medical history and tumor biopsy histology were reviewed, and the patients' clinical status was reassessed. Baseline studies were performed for hemoglobin, hematocrit, WBC count, platelet count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, protein electrophoresis, renal function, liver enzymes, C-reactive protein, rheumatoid factor, antinuclear and anti–double-stranded DNA antibodies, immunoglobulin levels, and urinalysis. These tests were repeated 1 week after injection of plasmids. All patients had histologically proven cutaneous relapse of their breast cancer, good performance status (World Health Organization status 0, 1, or 2), normal renal and hematologic parameters, and a life expectancy of at least 3 months. Other prerequisites included failure of conventional treatment (radiotherapy, endocrine therapy, and at least one systemic form of chemotherapy) with an interval of at least 4 weeks since previous chemotherapy. Patients with visceral metastases, active autoimmune disease, or concomitant infection with hepatitis virus or human immunodeficiency virus were excluded. Patients continued to be reviewed after GPAT both in the Gene Therapy Clinic and by their own oncologist.

The erbB-2 status was established by immunohistochemistry using two antibodies to the human erbB-2 receptor (Dako, High Wycombe, United Kingdom, and Biogen, Poole, United Kingdom), which gave concordant results. The positive control was tissue from a case of Paget's disease of the nipple, which is known to overexpress the erbB-2 oncogene. Four-micrometer sections were mounted onto poly-L-lysine–coated slides. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by incubation in 0.3% H202 for 15 minutes, and the potential for nonspecific binding of erbB-2 antibodies was reduced by blocking in normal goat serum at 1/20 dilution for 30 minutes. Slides were incubated in primary antibodies that were diluted according to the manufacturer's recommendation at 4°C overnight, then incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature with the appropriate biotinylated secondary antibody before labeling with peroxidase-streptavidin at 1/500 dilution also for 30 minutes and subsequent incubation in diaminobenzidine chromogen for 10 minutes.

Membrane immunoreactivity in at least 30% of the tumor cells was considered a positive result to qualify for trial entry. Only membrane-associated staining was considered significant because previous studies have shown that such immunoreactivity correlates with at least threefold overexpression of erbB-2 compared with that in normal breast.13 The degree of overexpression of erbB-2 by immunohistochemistry was designated according to the proportion of tumor cells that expressed the oncoprotein: moderate (+) indicated that up to 30% of all tumor cells were positive, intermediate (++) indicated that 30% to 70% were positive, and high (+++) indicated that more than 70% were positive.

For each patient, three similar-sized discrete lesions were marked, measured, and photographed: one lesion was injected with pERCY plasmid that contained the proximal erbB-2/CD chimera, and the second was injected with the control plasmid polyNeo, which had the same plasmid backbone as pERCY with the erbB-2 promoter/CD chimera removed (see Patients and Methods; Fig 1). The third lesion was not injected and served as another control. The clinical schedule is shown in Fig 2, and details of the plasmid dose escalation in the first four patients and prodrug infusion (in the first eight patients only) are listed in Table 1. Responses to GPAT were evaluated clinically by an independent observer (eg, changes in shape of the nodules), as well by two perpendicular measurements of the tumor nodule diameters and by clinical photography. Complete tumor response was defined as the complete disappearance of the injected cutaneous tumor nodule; partial response was defined as >= 50% reduction of the sum of the products of the perpendicular diameters. Biopsy specimens were collected after treatment using a 3-mm punch biopsy on days 2 and 7. The tissue was orientated and divided longitudinally using a sterile scalpel. One half of the tissue was snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and the other half was fixed in formalin and paraffin embedded the same day.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Plasmids used in the clinical trial. Both plasmids pERCY and polyNeo are based on the vector pcDNA3 with the cytomegalovirus promoter/enhancer removed. Only pERCY contains the ERBB2 proximal promoter/CD chimeric minigene.

 


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Clinical schedule. Three discrete skin lesions were selected. Two lesions were injected with either pERCY or polyNeo plasmid, while the third was an uninjected control. Biopsy specimens were taken at 24 hours and 7 days; eight patients received 5-FC infusion starting at 48 hours.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of Patients in the Clinical Trial
 

All injections were in 0.2 mL of sterile water and directed into the center of the tumor nodules using a 22-gauge needle. A biopsy specimen was taken from the injected nodules at 24 hours, and an intravenous infusion of 5-FC prodrug 200 mg/kg/24 hours (Alcobon; ICN Pharmaceuticals, Basingstoke, United Kingdom) commenced 48 hours after the DNA injection for the first eight patients only, given for a total duration of 48 hours. Further biopsy specimens, measurements, and photographs were taken 7 days after the initial injection.

Clinical Safety
The study was approved by Hammersmith Hospital's National Health Service Trust Hospital Ethical Committee and by the United Kingdom Gene Therapy Advisory Committee, protocol number 012. Adverse effects were recorded using recognized World Health Organization toxicity criteria. Theoretical risks associated with this trial potentially included insertional mutagenesis, anti-DNA antibody formation, local infection, tumor nodule ulceration, and perturbed liver and platelet function caused by the prodrug. These were all carefully discussed with the patients before obtaining written informed consent. The recruited patients had a limited life expectancy because of their existing advanced disease. Patients were carefully monitored on an inpatient basis while receiving infusional 5-FC. All 12 patients completed the trial satisfactorily. There was no deterioration in any patient's health during the week of the trial. There was no evidence of local or systemic toxicity caused by injection of pERCY or polyNeo plasmids, nor was there evidence of hematologic or hepatic toxicity caused by infusional 5-FC. One patient (patient no. 3) had mildly elevated transaminase levels before her diagnosis of breast cancer; these levels did not change after gene therapy. There was no evidence of antibody formation to double-stranded DNA in any of the 12 patients.

Construction of pERCY and polyNeo
A 544-bp DNA fragment of the proximal 5' flanking region of the erbB-2 gene (containing the AP-2 response element) was isolated as previously described14 and cloned into pBluescript II SK+ (Stratagene Ltd, Cambridge, United Kingdom). A 1,522-bp DNA fragment encoding Escherichia coli cytosine deaminase was isolated from pCD2 (donated by Dr Craig Mullen, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) and cloned downstream of the 544-bp erbB-2 fragment to produce the intermediate plasmid perbB-2–CD. The plasmids used for this trial were based on the commercially available vector pcDNA3 (Invitrogen, Leek, the Netherlands). The 2.1–kilobase chimeric minigene comprising the erbB-2 promoter and the CD gene was subcloned into pcDNA3 at the BamHI restriction site after the CMV promoter/enhancer had been removed and was designated pERCY. The control plasmid polyNeo was created by BglI and BamHI digestion of pcDNA3 to remove the cytomegalovirus promoter/enhancer and religation of the free ends that destroyed the BamHI restriction site.

Digestion of Therapeutic and Control Plasmids
Both plasmids were stored at –70°C, and aliquot restriction was mapped every 3 months to ensure plasmid DNA integrity (> 90% of uncut plasmid was supercoiled).

Expression of CD
CD immunoreactivity was assessed by a pathologist (blinded to the treatment received by each lesion) on cell lines and cryostat sections of snap-frozen tissue. Cultured cells grown on sterile glass slides and tissue sections were fixed and permeabilized using 3% paraformaldehyde/phosphate-bufferd saline for 5 minutes at room temperature, incubated in 0.05 mmol/L NH4Cl/phoshate-buffered saline at room temperature, incubated in cold absolute methanol at -20°C for 10 minutes, and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100/phosphate-buffered saline at room temperature for 5 minutes. The primary monoclonal antibody to CD 16D8F215 was used at a 10-µg/mL dilution for 30 minutes at room temperature, then a secondary antibody with biotinylated peroxidase was used to detect CD protein.

Detection of Intralesional CD mRNA by In Situ Hybridization
The protocol described by Senior et al16 was used. The CD gene required for preparation of the riboprobes for this in situ work was directionally cloned into pGEM-4 vector (Promega UK, Southampton, United Kingdom) using the EcoRI and HindIII sites. Linearized pGEM-4 containing a 428-bp CD insert was used for in vitro transcription of the riboprobe with EcoRI for production of sense strand (negative control) under control of the T7 promoter and HindIII for production of antisense strand under the control of the SP6 promoter. pBluescript containing beta-actin cDNA linearized with DraI and transcribed under the control of the SP6 promoter was used as a further control riboprobe. The activities of radiolabeled probes eluted from Chromaspin-30 columns (Clontech Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA) were assessed in a scintillation counter and were between 3.03 x 106 cpm and 3.65 x 106 cpm. All sections were examined with CD sense, CD antisense, and beta-actin antisense probes.

Thin-Layer Chromatography
The percentage conversion of cytosine to uracil over a standard 20-minute time period was calculated according to the method of Andersen et al.17


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
A total of 72 patients with nodular cutaneous recurrence of breast cancer were screened for erbB-2 status; biopsy specimens from 14 (19%) of the screened patients met the criteria for overexpression of erbB-2. Of these 14 patients, 12 were able to participate in the study. Eleven patients had moderately or poorly differentiated invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast, and one patient had metastatic Paget's disease of the breast. The size of nodules varied between patients, but in each case the treated and control nodules were matched for size and shape. Histopathologic examination showed that the degree of stromal reaction was variable between samples.

Clinical details of individual patients along with plasmid and prodrug doses are listed in Table 1. Within the group of 12 recruited patients, there was a wide range in terms of age (range, 34 to 78 years) and duration of disease (range, 6 to 36 months). Although five of the 12 patients had been premenopausal at the time of diagnosis, all patients were postmenopausal at the time of the trial. There were also differences in the extent of overexpression of erbB-2 as determined by immunohistochemistry. Each patient had received appropriate surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormonal therapy in their own clinical units. Five patients were receiving hormonal therapy with tamoxifen or a peripheral aromatase inhibitor that was continued during the gene therapy trial.

The effects of GPAT on injected tumors are listed in Table 1. There was evidence of reduction of tumor volume after pERCY injection in four patients: one patient had received 200 µg of plasmid (patient no. 3), and the other three had received 400 µg of plasmid (patients no. 5, 9, and 12). In patient no. 3, the reduction in tumor volume was evident macroscopically with involution of the apex of the lesion without ulceration of the overlying skin, whereas the corresponding control lesions remained unchanged (Fig 3). In patient no. 5, there was also regression in the two control lesions (the uninjected nodule and the lesion injected with polyNeo). A reduction in tumor volume after pERCY injection was also observed in two patients (patients no. 9 and 12) who did not receive prodrug. Patient no. 4 showed some flattening of the pERCY-treated nodule without a change in overall volume of the lesion.



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Clinical appearance of pERCY-injected nodule. Cutaneous nodular recurrence of breast cancer in patient no. 3 at day 0 (A) and at day 7 after injection of 200 µg pERCY plasmid and infusion of 5-FC (B).

 

Analysis of Biopsy Tissue
Histology. The biopsy specimens of the nodules contained tumor cells in all but three instances, and the histologic type of cancer was consistent with the original diagnosis. Three biopsy specimens (patient no. 12, day-2 biopsy; patient no. 2, day-7 biopsy; and patient no. 3, day-7 biopsy) contained no identifiable tumor cells; instead, the subcutaneous tissue showed a densely cellular fibroblastic proliferation. No significant difference in the inflammatory cellular reaction was observed in any of the biopsy tissues before and after treatment.

Immunohistochemistry for CD expression. Serial sections were used for histopathologic examination (hematoxylin-eosin staining) and immunohistochemistry with the anti-CD monoclonal antibody 16D8F2.15 The antibody was initially tested on the erbB-2–positive pancreatic cancer tumor cell line HPAF transfected with the CD gene (HPAF CD500) as well as the parental line (negative for CD; Figs 4A and 4B). For the biopsy samples, the degree of CD expression by immunohistochemistry was designated according to the proportion of immunoreactive tumor cells: moderate (+) indicated that up to 30% of all tumor cells were positive, intermediate (++) indicated that 30% to 70% were positive, and high (+++) indicated that more than 70% were positive. Control sections used phosphate-buffered saline in place of the primary antibody. The results are summarized in Table 2, and representative examples of the immunohistochemical studies are shown in Figs 4C through 4F. There was evidence of CD immunoreactivity in day-2 biopsy specimens from nine patients, and the enzyme was also detected, albeit at a lower level, 1 week later in the second biopsy specimen in three of these nine patients. In all cases, the CD immunoreactivity was restricted to tumor cells, with no detectable expression in stromal fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and mononuclear cells, or in the overlying epidermis. The localization of CD expression was consistent with erbB-2–expressing tumor cells (Fig 4I).



View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. Detection of CD expression. (A) No immunoreactivity in parental HPAF cells, but (B) strong immunoreactivity in HPAF CD500 cells. (C) Immunoreactivity restricted to tumor cells invading dermis in day-2 biopsy specimens of pERCY-injected nodule (patient no. 11). (D) No CD immunoreactivity in polyNeo-injected nodule (day 2), (E) strong immunoreactivity in pERCY-injected nodule at day 2 and (F) weaker immunoreactivity at day 7, and (I) erbB-2 expression in tumor cells, all in patient no. 10. (G) No signal by in situ hybridization for CD in the polyNeo-injected nodule, but (H) strong signal (tumor cells only) in the pERCY-injected nodule of patient no. 4 at day 2.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Results of Molecular Analysis of Patient Biopsy Tissue From Lesions Injected With pERCY*
 

Detection of intralesional CD mRNA by in situ hybridization. In situ hybridization was performed on formalin-fixed tissue sections using 35S-labeled riboprobes transcribed from the cloned CD cDNA and beta-actin cDNA, and sections were exposed for emulsion for 11 days before the autographic sections were developed. A representative study is shown in Figs 4G and 4H. There was a positive signal in the first pERCY biopsy specimens from four patients. The degree of hybridization was designated according to the number of cells on each biopsy specimen that demonstrated a positive signal: moderate (+) indicated that up to 30% of all tumor cells were positive, intermediate (++) indicated that 30% to 70% were positive, and high (+++) indicated that more than 70% were positive. The results are listed in Table 2. No signal was observed in biopsy specimens from nodules from the same patients after injection with polyNeo. All four patients with positive signals on in situ hybridization also showed positive immunoreactivity for CD protein in their respective day-2 biopsy specimens.

Determination of CD activity by thin-layer chromatography. This assay was validated initially on CD-transduced (HPAF CD500) and control (HPAF) pancreatic tumor cell lines before using biopsy tissue. This allowed us to determine the sensitivity of the technique by evaluating the number of cells required for detection of converted prodrug. One million cells from the CD-positive cell line HPAF CD500 were used in a pilot assay and were shown to give an easily detectable activity. In biopsy tissue from the clinical trial, there was evidence of enzyme activity by conversion of cytosine to uracil in three of 12 patients injected with the pERCY plasmid, and there was no conversion in any nodule injected with polyNeo. The degree of conversion varied among patients and is shown in Fig 5. In day-2 biopsy specimens, the conversion was 75% (patient no. 2), 69% (patient no. 6), and 8% (patient no. 8). Conversion was also observed in day-7 biopsy specimens of two patients, although to a lesser degree than that observed in the day-2 biopsy specimens (patient no. 2 at 44% and patient no. 5 at 8%). Despite the fact that the cryostat sections used for the CD immunohistochemistry were taken from the snap-frozen portion of the biopsy core before it was homogenized for the enzyme activity assay, there was no clear correlation with CD immunoreactivity on day-2 or day-7 biopsy specimens. Patient no. 6 showed evidence of 69% conversion of cytosine to uracil despite no evidence of CD immunoreactivity on either day-2 or day-7 biopsy specimens.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 5. Assay for CD activity: Lysates from biopsy material and pancreatic cell lines (parental and CD-transfected HPAF) assayed for CD activity (conversion of 3H-cytosine to 3H-uracil) by thin-layer chromatography.

 


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The present study demonstrates that a transcriptionally targeted GPAT strategy may be applied safely in the oncology clinic and without local or systemic complications. We have shown that local injection of plasmid DNA results in expression of the suicide gene and that the enzyme expressed in the tissue is capable of activating a prodrug. Targeted expression of a functional suicide gene in tumor tissue has been demonstrated by three different methods: in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and thin-layer chromatography.

There was evidence of gene transfer and expression in 11 of 12 patients, and, importantly, expression seemed to be highly selective for tumor cells. The high efficiency of gene transfer after simple intralesional injection of naked DNA in certain cases is particularly encouraging because no facilitators, such as liposomes, were used to increase plasmid uptake in the tumor nodules. We have shown for the first time that CD expression can be monitored in a human in vivo gene transfer study by immunocytochemistry using a CD-specific monoclonal antibody. Furthermore, thin-layer chromatography studies allowed us to evaluate the number of cells expressing functional CD that would then be capable of converting the prodrug to its toxic metabolite within the treated lesions.

In two patients who received therapeutic gene and prodrug, there was evidence of tumor regression restricted to the nodule injected with the therapeutic construct (pERCY). In two other patients, there was evidence of a reduction in tumor nodule volume after pERCY injection (without prodrug infusion), which was also observed concurrently in a small proportion of other chest wall lesions, including those treated with polyNeo and uninjected lesions. A small degree of temporary regression in cutaneous disease is not an uncommon phenomenon in breast cancer and does not necessarily suggest an immune (ie, systemic) response induced by the plasmid DNA injection. However, several groups have reported that killing tumor cells in vivo with genetic prodrug activation systems (including CD) can lead to the development of T-cell–dependent antitumor immunity, probably by increasing the availability of tumor antigens to professional antigen presenting cells.2,18-22

The present study was performed in a relatively small number of patients, which partly reflects the restricted entry criteria for the trial. In addition, because the smaller scirrhous lesions were often the only treatable discrete tumors, it was difficult to obtain biopsy specimens later and sometimes little assessable tumor was available in the tissue. This complicated the analysis of gene transfer and expression in these cases.

Theoretical risks of gene transfer include insertional mutagenesis, anti-DNA antibody formation, local infection, and tumor nodule ulceration. None of these complications occurred in any of these patients, despite the fact that relatively large doses of plasmid DNA was injected directly into the subcutaneous tissue, which reinforces our view that this is a safe strategy with minimal side effects.

The completion of this trial highlights a number of practical issues that are clearly relevant for future trials that use GPAT or other gene therapy strategies. Selection of this specific phenotype of breast cancer (nodular cutaneous erbB-2–expressing lesions) caused some problems with patient recruitment. Despite the high prevalence of breast cancer and access to a large clinical practice at this unit, it took more than 18 months to recruit the 12 patients required for the trial. The advantages of using patients with skin nodules were ease of access, low risks associated with a skin biopsy, and the ability to monitor and assess lesions very simply. However, the densely fibrous nature of some of the lesions meant that the tissue that was injected with plasmid and/or underwent biopsy was not satisfactory for molecular analysis, and made histology, immunohistochemistry, and in situ hybridization difficult because of the low concentration of neoplastic cells in the matrix.

Even under optimal conditions in vitro, a majority of cells can remain untransduced using currently available gene delivery technology. Alternatives include the use of viral vectors, but these may not be without their own complications; our experience suggests that this can lead to varying patterns of suicide gene expression that, in turn, will influence the efficacy of prodrug conversion. For example, studies have demonstrated that tissue-specific expression can often be lost as a result of promoter interference.23-25 As a consequence, improvements in promoter specificity and efficiency, along with improved design of insulated conditional expression elements in retroviral and adenoviral vectors, must be considered. Increasing local delivery of the therapeutic gene to tumor cells may be an approach appropriate to a single tumor in poorly accessible "sanctuary sites" such as in the brain, rather than the type of multiple separate metastases injected in this trial. However, even local delivery of high-dose suicide genes may not be sufficient for therapeutic effect, even by deliberate peritumoral injection. This has been exemplified by recent attempts at intratumoral delivery of a replication-defective retrovirus/suicide gene construct by intrathecal implantation of vector-producing cells to maintain high viral titers around the tumor. Very limited gene transfer occurred, despite high local density of virus-producing cells; only five of 15 patients with recurrent brain tumors in this study showed responses, and then only if tumors were very small.26

Further improvements to address these limitations include the use of viral vectors with the same proximal promoter element driving an alternative suicide gene such as HSV-TK, or the use of chimeric transcriptional elements that have the advantages of combining strong promoters with tissue-specific enhancers to improve targeting and suicide gene expression levels. We have shown that this approach has promise in a study that combined the erbB-2 and MUC1 promoter elements, resulting in increased sensitivity of MUC1-expressing cells to the effect of ganciclovir.27 Alternatively, concomitant expression of two suicide genes by one tissue-specific promoter could mediate greater levels of cytotoxicity beyond that observed with either suicide gene alone. There is recent evidence that, at least in vivo, the CD and HSV-TK suicide gene systems can be effectively combined not only to enhance cell kill, but also to increase the radiosensitivity of 9L gliosarcoma cells beyond that observed with each system alone.28 Future clinical trials may be able to exploit a bifunctional CD/HSV-TKsuicide gene coupled with radiotherapy to provide an improved means of treating cancer with a high degree of selectivity.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
Supported by the Imperial Cancer Research Fund and the Mike Stone Cancer Research Fund. A.R. was supported by a clinical research fellowship from the Mike Stone Cancer Research Fund.

We gratefully acknowledge the following clinical colleagues for contributing patients to the study: Drs Hilary Thomas, Claire Vernon, and Jonathan Waxman (Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Campus); Professor Charles Coombes (Imperial College School of Medicine, Charing Cross Campus); Dr Hani Gabra (Western General Hospital, Edinburgh); Dr Chris Gallagher (Royal London Hospital); and Dr Anne Hong (Royal Exeter Hospital). We also acknowledge the contribution made by Dr Jonathan Harris in the original construction of the pERCY and polyNeo plasmids and the preclinical work that validated the approach. In addition, we thank Professor Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz and Dr Karin Haak for the provision of the anti-CD antibody; Dr Craig Mullen for the CD cDNA; Karl-Heinz Blenk for technical assistance with the in situ hybridization; and Professor Bill Gullick and Dr Richard Vile for critical reading and discussion of the manuscript.


    NOTES
 
The contribution of each author is considered equal.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
1. Huber BE, Austin EA, Good SS, et al: In vivo antitumor activity of 5-fluorocytosine on human colorectal carcinoma cells genetically modified to express cytosine deaminase. Cancer Res 53:4619-4626, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Mullen CA, Coale MM, Lowe R, et al: Tumors expressing the cytosine deaminase suicide gene can be eliminated in vivo with 5-fluorocytosine and induce protective immunity to wild type tumor. Cancer Res 54:1503-1506, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Lovekin C, Ellis IO, Locker A, et al: c-erbB-2 oncoprotein expression in primary and advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer 63:439-443, 1991[Medline]

4. Gusterson BA, Gelber RD, Goldhirsch A, et al: Prognostic importance of c-erbB-2 expression in breast cancer: International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 10:1049-1056, 1992[Abstract]

5. Borg A, Tandon AK, Sigurdsson H, et al: HER-2/neu amplification predicts poor survival in node-positive breast cancer. Cancer Res 50:4332-4337, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Richner J, Gerber HA, Locher GW, et al: c-erbB-2 protein expression in node negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol 1:263-268, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Allred DC, Clark GM, Tandon AK, et al: HER-2/neu in node-negative breast cancer: Prognostic significance of overexpression influenced by the presence of in situ carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 10:599-605, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Gullick WJ, Love SB, Wright C, et al: c-erbB-2 protein overexpression in breast cancer is a risk factor in patients with involved and uninvolved lymph nodes. Br J Cancer 63:434-438, 1991[Medline]

9. Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, et al: Human breast cancer: Correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science 235:177-182, 1987[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Borg A, Baldetorp B, Ferno M, et al: ERBB2 amplification is associated with tamoxifen resistance in steroid-receptor positive breast cancer. Cancer Lett 81:137-144, 1994[Medline]

11. Tetu B, Brisson J, Sigurdsson H, et al: Prognostic significance of HER-2/neu oncoprotein expression in node-positive breast cancer. Cancer 73:2359-2365, 1994[Medline]

12. Harris JD, Gutierrez AA, Hurst HC, et al: Gene therapy for cancer using tumour-specific prodrug activation. Gene Ther 1:170-175, 1994[Medline]

13. Slamon DJ, Godolphin W, Jones LA, et al: Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. Science 244:707-712, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Hollywood DP, Hurst HC: A novel transcription factor, OB2-1, is required for overexpression of the proto-oncogene c-erbB-2 in mammary tumour lines. EMBO J 12:2369-2375, 1993[Medline]

15. Haack K, Moebius U, Knebel Doeberitz MV, et al: Detection of cytosine deaminase in genetically modified tumor cells by specific antibodies. Hum Gene Ther 8:1395-1401, 1997[Medline]

16. Senior PV, Byrne S, Brammar WJ, et al: Expression of the IGF-II/mannose-6-phosphate receptor mRNA and protein in the developing rat. Development 109:67-73, 1990[Abstract]

17. Andersen L, Kilstrup M, Neuhard J: Pyrimidine, purine and nitrogen control of cytosine deaminase synthesis in Escherichia coli K 12. Involvement of the glnLG and purR genes in the regulation of codA expression. Arch Microbiol 152:115-118, 1989[Medline]

18. Caruso M, Panis Y, Gagandeep S, et al: Regression of established macroscopic liver metastases after in situ transduction of a suicide gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90:7024-7028, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Barba D, Hardin J, Sadelain M, et al: Development of antitumor immunity following thymidine kinase-mediated killing of experimental brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:4348-4352, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Vile RG, Nelson JA, Castleden S, et al: Systemic gene therapy of murine melanoma using tissue specific expression of the HSVtk gene involves an immune component. Cancer Res 54:6228-6234, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Consalvo M, Mullen CA, Modesti A, et al: 5-Fluorocytosine-induced eradication of murine adenocarcinomas engineered to express the cytosine deaminase suicide gene requires host immune competence and leaves an efficient memory. J Immunol 154:5302-5312, 1995[Abstract]

22. Freeman SM, Ramesh R, Marrogi AJ: Immune system in suicide-gene therapy. Lancet 349:2-3, 1997[Medline]

23. Vile RG, Miller N, Chernajovsky Y, et al: A comparison of the properties of different retroviral vectors containing the murine tyrosinase promoter to achieve transcriptionally targeted expression of the HSVtk or IL-2 genes. Gene Ther 1:307-316, 1994[Medline]

24. Richards CA, Huber BE: Generation of a transgenic model for retrovirus-mediated gene therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma is thwarted by the lack of transgene expression. Hum Gene Ther 4:143-150, 1993[Medline]

25. Ring CJ, Harris JD, Hurst HC, et al: Suicide gene expression induced in tumour cells transduced with recombinant adenoviral, retroviral and plasmid vectors containing the ERBB2 promoter. Gene Ther 3:1094-1103, 1996[Medline]

26. Ram Z, Culver KW, Oshiro EM, et al: Therapy of malignant brain tumors by intratumoral implantation of retroviral vector-producing cells. Nat Med 3:1354-1361, 1997[Medline]

27. Ring CJ, Blouin P, Martin LA, et al: Use of transcriptional regulatory elements of the MUC1 and ERBB2 genes to drive tumour-selective expression of a prodrug activating enzyme. Gene Ther 4:1045-1052, 1997[Medline]

28. Rogulski KR, Kim JH, Kim SH, et al: Glioma cells transduced with an Escherichia coli CD/HSV-1 TK fusion gene exhibit enhanced metabolic suicide and radiosensitivity. Hum Gene Ther 8:73-85, 1997[Medline]

Submitted November 17, 1998; accepted February 24, 1999.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
T. P.F. Gade, J. A. Koutcher, W. M. Spees, B. J. Beattie, V. Ponomarev, M. Doubrovin, I. M. Buchanan, T. Beresten, K. L. Zakian, H. C. Le, et al.
Imaging Transgene Activity In vivo
Cancer Res., April 15, 2008; 68(8): 2878 - 2884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. L. Ramnaraine, W. E. Mathews, J. M. Donohue, C. M. Lynch, M. J. Goblirsch, and D. R. Clohisy
Osteoclasts Direct Bystander Killing of Bone Cancer.
Cancer Res., November 15, 2006; 66(22): 10929 - 10935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Goblirsch, P. Zwolak, M. L. Ramnaraine, W. Pan, C. Lynch, P. Alaei, and D. R. Clohisy
Novel Cytosine deaminase fusion gene enhances the effect of radiation on breast cancer in bone by reducing tumor burden, osteolysis, and skeletal fracture.
Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2006; 12(10): 3168 - 3176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
F. Ou-Yang, K.-L. Lan, C.-T. Chen, J.-C. Liu, C.-L. Weng, C.-K. Chou, X. Xie, J.-Y. Hung, Y. Wei, G. N. Hortobagyi, et al.
Endostatin-Cytosine Deaminase Fusion Protein Suppresses Tumor Growth by Targeting Neovascular Endothelial Cells
Cancer Res., January 1, 2006; 66(1): 378 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
X. Li, J. Zhang, H. Gao, E. Vieth, K.-H. Bae, Y.-P. Zhang, S.-J. Lee, S. Raikwar, T. A. Gardner, G. D. Hutchins, et al.
Transcriptional targeting modalities in breast cancer gene therapy using adenovirus vectors controlled by {alpha}-lactalbumin promoter
Mol. Cancer Ther., December 1, 2005; 4(12): 1850 - 1859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Li, B. Yu, P. An, G. Chen, W. Lu, H. Cai, W. Guo, and F. Zuo
Combined Liposome-Mediated Cytosine Deaminase Gene Therapy with Radiation in Killing Rectal Cancer Cells and Xenografts in Athymic Mice
Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2005; 11(9): 3574 - 3578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
L. Barzon, M. Boscaro, and G. Palu
Endocrine Aspects of Cancer Gene Therapy
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2004; 25(1): 1 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
M. Schuldiner, J. Itskovitz-Eldor, and N. Benvenisty
Selective Ablation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells Expressing a "Suicide" Gene
Stem Cells, May 1, 2003; 21(3): 257 - 265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
A. Rosner, K. Miyoshi, E. Landesman-Bollag, X. Xu, D. C. Seldin, A. R. Moser, C. L. MacLeod, G. Shyamala, A. E. Gillgrass, and R. D. Cardiff
Pathway Pathology : Histological Differences Between ErbB/Ras and Wnt Pathway Transgenic Mammary Tumors
Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2002; 161(3): 1087 - 1097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
G. Xu and H. L. McLeod
Strategies for Enzyme/Prodrug Cancer Therapy
Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2001; 7(11): 3314 - 3324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
L. Ermert, A. C. Hocke, H.-R. Duncker, W. Seeger, and M. Ermert
Comparison of Different Detection Methods in Quantitative Microdensitometry
Am. J. Pathol., February 1, 2001; 158(2): 407 - 417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pandha, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lemoine, N. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pandha, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lemoine, N. R.

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1999 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online