Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knell, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Neugut, A. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knell, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Neugut, A. I.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 17, Issue 6 (June), 1999: 1962
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Oncology


SPECIAL DEPARTMENTS

Re-evaluation of Benefits of BRCA1/2 Testing

Ellen R. Knell, Cary A. Presant

California Cancer Medical Center, West Covina, CA

To the Editor: The article entitled "Benefits and Costs of Screening Ashkenazi Jewish Women for BRCA1 and BRCA2" by Grann et al1 simulating the cost effectiveness of mutation testing for Ashkenazi Jewish women is interesting but would be improved if the following two additional factors were addressed. First, the statistics on the efficacy of breast screening rely on a general, rather than a high-risk, population. One reason for mutation testing is to begin breast screening earlier than usual for those at greatly increased risk, such as mutation carriers, since breast cancers commonly occur before age 40 in mutation carriers. If a simulation were performed using statistics on carrier women beginning at age 30, we believe the cost effectiveness of mutation testing would be enhanced, as well as the efficacy of screening as a viable option in carrier women.

Second, the authors allude to the proportion of Ashkenazi women who test negative for the three frequent mutations yet have a substantial personal and/or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancers. Many unique mutations are found in some of these Ashkenazi families, as are found in breast cancer families in general. Many Ashkenazi women with presumed mutations have not yet had the specific mutations identified. We strongly urge counseling for such families, to emphasize that failing to identify a mutation, even with complete sequencing, is not equivalent to not having a mutation, unless the causative mutation in the specific family has already been characterized.

REFERENCES

1. Grann VR, Whang W, Jacobson JS, et al: Benefits and costs of screening Ashkenzai Jewish women for BRCA1 and BRCA2. J Clin Oncol 17:494-500 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]


 

Response

Victor R. Grann, William Whang, Judith S. Jacobson, Daniel F. Heitjan, Karen H. Antman, Alfred I. Neugut

Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY

In Reply: Drs Knell and Presant call attention to two important points in our recent publication in the February 1999 issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology.1 In a previous study,2 we modeled the cost effectiveness of prophylactic surgery compared with surveillance for 30-year-old women who are mutation carriers. In the present study, our model indicated that in an Ashkenazi Jewish population with a 2.5% incidence of three specific mutations (not the general population with a mutation risk of less than 0.2%), 30-year-old women who intended to take appropriate preventive interventions if they tested positive for BRCA1/2 would benefit from prophylactic surgery. The model also indicated that waiting to have the surgery would reduce the benefit (increase the cost per life-year saved).

We focused our analysis on women with one of the three Ashkenazi Jewish mutations and did not assume that "screening Ashkenazi Jewish women with a family history of cancer will have a higher yield than screening Ashkenazi Jewish women irrespective of family history." We certainly agree that women who test negative for these mutations may still have other mutations or risks of developing breast cancer. Although we did not address counseling, we certainly agree that it is necessary. We also agree that among women who have a strong family history of breast cancer not associated with a known mutation, a negative test result is no guarantee of average risk.

As newer mutations are described, we plan to incorporate them into our model.

REFERENCES

1. Grann VR, Whang W, Jacobson JS, et al: Benefits and costs of screening Ashkenzai Jewish women for BRCA1 and BRCA2. J Clin Oncol 17:494-500 1999

2. Grann VR, Panageas KS, Whang W, et al: Decision analysis of prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy in BRCA1-positive or BRCA2-positive patients. J Clin Oncol 16:979-985 1998[Abstract]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
G. Cartron, H. Watier, J. Golay, and P. Solal-Celigny
From the bench to the bedside: ways to improve rituximab efficacy
Blood, November 1, 2004; 104(9): 2635 - 2642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. Rambaldi, M. Lazzari, C. Manzoni, E. Carlotti, L. Arcaini, M. Baccarani, T. Barbui, C. Bernasconi, G. Dastoli, G. Fuga, et al.
Monitoring of minimal residual disease after CHOP and rituximab in previously untreated patients with follicular lymphoma
Blood, February 1, 2002; 99(3): 856 - 862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
D. Huhn, C. von Schilling, M. Wilhelm, A. D. Ho, M. Hallek, R. Kuse, W. Knauf, U. Riedel, A. Hinke, S. Srock, et al.
Rituximab therapy of patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Blood, September 1, 2001; 98(5): 1326 - 1331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. C. Byrd, T. Murphy, R. S. Howard, M. S. Lucas, A. Goodrich, K. Park, M. Pearson, J. K. Waselenko, G. Ling, M. R. Grever, et al.
Rituximab Using A Thrice Weekly Dosing Schedule in B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma Demonstrates Clinical Activity and Acceptable Toxicity
J. Clin. Oncol., April 15, 2001; 19(8): 2153 - 2164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knell, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Neugut, A. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knell, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Neugut, A. I.

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1999 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online