Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 22 (August 1), 2005: pp. 5088-5093
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.164

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mian, S.
Right arrow Articles by Schadendorf, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mian, S.
Right arrow Articles by Schadendorf, D.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Editorial

Serum Proteomic Fingerprinting Discriminates Between Clinical Stages and Predicts Disease Progression in Melanoma Patients

Shahid Mian, Selma Ugurel, Erika Parkinson, Iris Schlenzka, Ian Dryden, Lee Lancashire, Graham Ball, Colin Creaser, Robert Rees, Dirk Schadendorf

From the Interdisciplinary Biomedical Research Centre, School of Science, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Lane, Clifton; School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham; Department of Animal Physiology, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, United Kingdom; Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Mannheim, Germany

Address reprint requests to Professor Robert Rees, Interdisciplinary Biomedical Research Centre, School of Science, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Lane, Clifton, Nottingham NG11 8NS, United Kingdom; e-mail: robert.rees{at}ntu.ac.uk

PURPOSE: Currently known serum biomarkers do not predict clinical outcome in melanoma. S100-ß is widely established as a reliable prognostic indicator in patients with advanced metastatic disease but is of limited predictive value in tumor-free patients. This study was aimed to determine whether molecular profiling of the serum proteome could discriminate between early- and late-stage melanoma and predict disease progression.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred five serum samples from 101 early-stage (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] stage I) and 104 advanced stage (AJCC stage IV) melanoma patients were analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation (MALDI) time-of-flight (ToF; MALDI-ToF) mass spectrometry utilizing protein chip technology and artificial neural networks (ANN). Serum samples from 55 additional patients after complete dissection of regional lymph node metastases (AJCC stage III), with 28 of 55 patients relapsing within the first year of follow-up, were analyzed in an attempt to predict disease recurrence. Serum S100-ß was measured using a sandwich immunoluminometric assay.

RESULTS: Analysis of 205 stage I/IV serum samples, utilizing a training set of 94 of 205 and a test set of 15 of 205 samples for 32 different ANN models, revealed correct stage assignment in 84 (88%) of 96 of a blind set of 96 of 205 serum samples. Forty-four (80%) of 55 stage III serum samples could be correctly assigned as progressors or nonprogressors using random sample cross-validation statistical methodologies. Twenty-three (82%) of 28 stage III progressors were correctly identified by MALDI-ToF combined with ANN, whereas only six (21%) of 28 could be detected by S100-ß.

CONCLUSION: Validation of these findings may enable proteomic profiling to become a valuable tool for identifying high-risk melanoma patients eligible for adjuvant therapeutic interventions.

Supported by the European Union grant QLG1-CT-2002-00668 (OISTER) and the John and Lucille van Geest Foundation.

All authors have contributed equally to this manuscript.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.


Related Editorial

  • Distilling Cancer Biomarkers From the Serum Peptidome: High Technology Reading of Tea Leaves or an Insight to Clinical Systems Biology?
    Richard J. Robbins, Josep Villanueva, and Paul Tempst
    JCO 2005 23: 4835-4837 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. Le Page, V. Ouellet, M. C.J. Quinn, P. N. Tonin, D. M. Provencher, and A.-M. Mes-Masson
BTF4/BTNA3.2 and GCS as Candidate mRNA Prognostic Markers in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2008; 17(4): 913 - 920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
C. A. Casiano, M. Mediavilla-Varela, and E. M. Tan
Tumor-associated Antigen Arrays for the Serological Diagnosis of Cancer
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2006; 5(10): 1745 - 1759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online