Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 10 (April 1), 2005: pp. 2145-2154
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.167
Randomized Trial of Amifostine in Locally Advanced NonSmall-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy and Hyperfractionated Radiation: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 98-01
Benjamin Movsas,
Charles Scott,
Corey Langer,
Maria Werner-Wasik,
Nicos Nicolaou,
Ritsuko Komaki,
Mitchell Machtay,
Colum Smith,
Rita Axelrod,
Linda Sarna,
Todd Wasserman,
Roger Byhardt
From the Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group; Fox Chase Cancer Center; Thomas Jefferson University; Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI; University of California Los Angeles School of Nursing, Los Angeles, CA; Washington University, St Louis, MO; and Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Address reprint requests to Benjamin Movsas, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI 48202; e-mail: bmovsas1{at}hfhs.org
PURPOSE: To test the ability of the cytoprotectant, amifostine, to reduce chemoradiotherapy-induced esophagitis and evaluate its influence on quality of life (QOL) and swallowing symptoms.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 243 patients with stage II to IIIA/B nonsmall-cell lung cancer received induction paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) days 1 and 22 and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) days 1 and 22, followed by concurrent weekly paclitaxel (50 mg/m2 IV) and carboplatin (AUC 2), and hyperfractionated radiation therapy (69.6 Gy at 1.2 Gy bid). Patients were randomly assigned at registration to amifostine (AM) 500 mg IV four times per week or no AM during chemoradiotherapy. Beyond standard toxicity end points, physician dysphagia logs (PDLs), daily patient swallowing diaries, and QOL (EORTC QLQ-C30/LC-13) were also collected. Swallowing AUC analyses were calculated from patient diaries and PDLs.
RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were randomly assigned to receive AM, and 122, to receive no AM (one patient was ineligible); 72% received AM per protocol or with a minor deviation. AM was associated with higher rates of acute nausea (P = .03), vomiting (P = .007), cardiovascular toxicity (P = .0001), and infection or febrile neutropenia (P = .03). The rate of grade 3 esophagitis was 30% with AM versus 34% without AM (P = .9). Patient diaries demonstrated lower swallowing dysfunction AUC with amifostine (z test P = .025). QOL was not significantly different between the two arms, except for pain, which showed more clinically meaningful improvement and less deterioration at 6 weeks follow-up (v pretreatment) in the AM arm (P = .003). The median survival rates for both arms were comparable (AM, 17.3 v no AM, 17.9 months; P = .87).
CONCLUSION: AM did not significantly reduce esophagitis grade 3 in patients receiving hyperfractionated radiation and chemotherapy. However, patient self-assessments suggested a possible advantage to AM that is being explored with modified dosing route strategies.
Supported by RTOG U10CA21661, CCOP U10CA37422, and Stat U10CA32115 grants from the National Cancer Institute and by Medimmune Oncology.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. D. Lawenda, K. M. Kelly, E. J. Ladas, S. M. Sagar, A. Vickers, and J. B. Blumberg
Should Supplemental Antioxidant Administration Be Avoided During Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy?
J Natl Cancer Inst,
June 4, 2008;
100(11):
773 - 783.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Socinski, A. W. Blackstock, J. A. Bogart, X. Wang, M. Munley, J. Rosenman, L. Gu, G. A. Masters, P. Ungaro, A. Sleeper, et al.
Randomized Phase II Trial of Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemotherapy and Dose-Escalated Thoracic Conformal Radiotherapy (74 Gy) in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: CALGB 30105
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 20, 2008;
26(15):
2457 - 2463.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Zhang, J. Qian, X. Xing, F.-M. Kong, L. Zhao, M. Chen, and T. S. Lawrence
Inhibition of the Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Pathway Is Radioprotective for the Lung
Clin. Cancer Res.,
March 15, 2008;
14(6):
1868 - 1876.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. W. Bruner
Should Patient-Reported Outcomes Be Mandatory for Toxicity Reporting in Cancer Clinical Trials?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 1, 2007;
25(34):
5345 - 5347.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. W. Bruner
Outcomes Research in Cancer Symptom Management Trials: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Conceptual Model
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs,
October 1, 2007;
2007(37):
12 - 15.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. E. Ferrans
Differences in What Quality-of-Life Instruments Measure
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs,
October 1, 2007;
2007(37):
22 - 26.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. M. Brizel
Pharmacologic Approaches to Radiation Protection
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 10, 2007;
25(26):
4084 - 4089.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Kouvaris, V. E. Kouloulias, and L. J. Vlahos
Amifostine: The First Selective-Target and Broad-Spectrum Radioprotector
Oncologist,
June 1, 2007;
12(6):
738 - 747.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. E. Vokes, J. E. Herndon II, M. J. Kelley, M. G. Cicchetti, N. Ramnath, H. Neill, J. N. Atkins, D. M. Watson, W. Akerley, and M. R. Green
Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Chemoradiotherapy Compared With Chemoradiotherapy Alone for Regionally Advanced Unresectable Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 1, 2007;
25(13):
1698 - 1704.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Y. Seiwert, P. P. Connell, A. M. Mauer, P. C. Hoffman, C. M. George, L. Szeto, R. Salgia, K. E. Posther, B. Nguyen, D. J. Haraf, et al.
A Phase I Study of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Concurrent Radiotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung or Esophageal Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res.,
January 15, 2007;
13(2):
515 - 522.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Huber, M. Flentje, M. Schmidt, B. Pollinger, H. Gosse, J. Willner, and K. Ulm
Simultaneous Chemoradiotherapy Compared With Radiotherapy Alone After Induction Chemotherapy in Inoperable Stage IIIA or IIIB Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Study CTRT99/97 by the Bronchial Carcinoma Therapy Group
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 20, 2006;
24(27):
4397 - 4404.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. E. Stinchcombe, D. Fried, D. E. Morris, and M. A. Socinski
Combined Modality Therapy for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Oncologist,
July 1, 2006;
11(7):
809 - 823.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. I. Block and C. Gyllenhaal
Commentary: The Pharmacological Antioxidant Amifostine--Implications of Recent Research for Integrative Cancer Care
Integr Cancer Ther,
December 1, 2005;
4(4):
329 - 351.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Movsas, C. Scott, C. Langer, M. Werner-Wasik, N. Nicolaou, M. Machtay, C. Smith, R. Axelrod, L. Sarna, T. Wasserman, et al.
In Reply:
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 1, 2005;
23(28):
7233 - 7235.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Komaki
What Should the Optimal Timing Be for Amifostine Administration Relative to Radiation and Chemotherapy?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 1, 2005;
23(28):
7232 - 7233.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. E. Vokes
Optimal Therapy for Unresectable Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 1, 2005;
23(25):
5853 - 5855.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|