Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bardou, V.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bardou, V.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, G. M.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 21, Issue 10 (May), 2003: 1973-1979
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Oncology

Progesterone Receptor Status Significantly Improves Outcome Prediction Over Estrogen Receptor Status Alone for Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Two Large Breast Cancer Databases

Valerie-Jeanne Bardou, Grazia Arpino, Richard M. Elledge, C. Kent Osborne, Gary M. Clark

From the Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, and the Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX.

Address reprint requests to Richard M. Elledge, MD, Breast Center at Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030; email: relledge{at}breastcenter.tmc.edu.

Purpose: To determine whether progesterone receptor (PgR) status provides additional value to estrogen receptor (ER) status and improves prediction of benefit from endocrine treatment among patients with primary breast cancer.

Patients and Methods: Clinical outcomes of patients in two large databases were analyzed as a function of steroid receptor status. The first database (PP), contained 3,739 patients who did not receive any systemic adjuvant therapy and 1,688 patients who received adjuvant endocrine therapy but no chemotherapy. The second database (SPORE), contained 10,444 patients who received adjuvant endocrine therapy but no chemotherapy. Biochemical ER and PgR assays were identically performed in two different central laboratories.

Results: In univariate and multivariate analyses, the prognostic significance of PgR status among systemically untreated patients is modest. Among endocrine-treated patients, however, multivariate analyses, including lymph-node involvement, tumor size, and age, demonstrate that PgR status is independently associated with disease-free and overall survival. For recurrence, the reduction in relative risk (RR) was 25% for ER-positive/PgR-negative patients and 53% for ER-positive/PgR-positive patients, compared with ER-negative/PgR-negative patients (P < .0001, PP patients). Patients with ER-positive/PgR-negative tumors have a reduction in RR of death of 30% (SPORE patients) and 38% (PP patients), compared with patients with ER-negative/PgR-negative tumors (P < .0001). For ER-positive/PgR-positive tumors, the reduction of the risk of death was greater than 46% in SPORE patients and 58% in PP patients, indicating that ER-positive/PgR-positive patients derive more benefit from endocrine therapy (P < .0001).

Conclusion: When accurately measured, PgR status is an independent predictive factor for benefit from adjuvant endocrine therapy. Therefore, PgR status should be taken into account when discussing RR reductions expected from endocrine treatment with individual patients.

Supported in part by grants P01 CA30195 and P50 CA58183 (Specialized Program of Research Excellence) from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, and Aventis, and a Fondazione Itaiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro grant.

Both V-J.B. and G.A. contributed equally to this article.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
M. J. Duffy and J. Crown
A Personalized Approach to Cancer Treatment: How Biomarkers Can Help
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2008; 54(11): 1770 - 1779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
W. J. Gradishar, J. R. Bellon, M. A. Gadd, H. A. D'Alessandro, and K. Braaten
Case 30-2008 -- A 47-Year-Old Woman with a Mass in the Breast and a Solitary Lesion in the Spine
N. Engl. J. Med., September 25, 2008; 359(13): 1382 - 1391.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
D. B. Hardy, B. A. Janowski, C.-C. Chen, and C. R. Mendelson
Progesterone Receptor Inhibits Aromatase and Inflammatory Response Pathways in Breast Cancer Cells via Ligand-Dependent and Ligand-Independent Mechanisms
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2008; 22(8): 1812 - 1824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
J. H. Chen, O. Nalcioglu, and M. Y. Su
MR imaging features of invasive breast cancer correlated with hormonal receptors: does progesterone receptor matter?
Ann. Onc., May 1, 2008; 19(5): 1024 - 1026.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
Y. Cui, J. M Shikany, S. Liu, Y. Shagufta, and T. E Rohan
Selected antioxidants and risk of hormone receptor-defined invasive breast cancers among postmenopausal women in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2008; 87(4): 1009 - 1018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
G. Arpino, L. Wiechmann, C. K. Osborne, and R. Schiff
Crosstalk between the Estrogen Receptor and the HER Tyrosine Kinase Receptor Family: Molecular Mechanism and Clinical Implications for Endocrine Therapy Resistance
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2008; 29(2): 217 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. Viale, M. M. Regan, E. Maiorano, M. G. Mastropasqua, R. Golouh, T. Perin, R. W. Brown, A. Kovacs, K. Pillay, C. Ohlschlegel, et al.
Chemoendocrine Compared With Endocrine Adjuvant Therapies for Node-Negative Breast Cancer: Predictive Value of Centrally Reviewed Expression of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors--International Breast Cancer Study Group
J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2008; 26(9): 1404 - 1410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
E. A. Rakha and I. O. Ellis
In Reply
J. Clin. Oncol., January 10, 2008; 26(2): 336 - 338.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
E. A. Rakha, M. E. El-Sayed, A. R. Green, E. C. Paish, D. G. Powe, J. Gee, R. I. Nicholson, A. H.S. Lee, J. F.R. Robertson, and I. O. Ellis
Biologic and Clinical Characteristics of Breast Cancer With Single Hormone Receptor Positive Phenotype
J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2007; 25(30): 4772 - 4778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
J. Chen, K. A. Power, J. Mann, A. Cheng, and L. U. Thompson
Flaxseed Alone or in Combination with Tamoxifen Inhibits MCF-7 Breast Tumor Growth in Ovariectomized Athymic Mice with High Circulating Levels of Estrogen
Experimental Biology and Medicine, September 1, 2007; 232(8): 1071 - 1080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. Viale, M. M. Regan, E. Maiorano, M. G. Mastropasqua, P. Dell'Orto, B. B. Rasmussen, J. Raffoul, P. Neven, Z. Orosz, S. Braye, et al.
Prognostic and Predictive Value of Centrally Reviewed Expression of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in a Randomized Trial Comparing Letrozole and Tamoxifen Adjuvant Therapy for Postmenopausal Early Breast Cancer: BIG 1-98
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 25(25): 3846 - 3852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. Mavi, T. F. Cermik, M. Urhan, H. Puskulcu, S. Basu, J. Q. Yu, H. Zhuang, B. Czerniecki, and A. Alavi
The Effects of Estrogen, Progesterone, and C-erbB-2 Receptor States on 18F-FDG Uptake of Primary Breast Cancer Lesions
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2007; 48(8): 1266 - 1272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
R. P. Carnevale, C. J. Proietti, M. Salatino, A. Urtreger, G. Peluffo, D. P. Edwards, V. Boonyaratanakornkit, E. H. Charreau, E. B. de Kier Joffe, R. Schillaci, et al.
Progestin Effects on Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation, Proteases Activation, and in Vivo Development of Metastatic Phenotype All Depend on Progesterone Receptor Capacity to Activate Cytoplasmic Signaling Pathways
Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2007; 21(6): 1335 - 1358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. H. Herynk, I. Parra, Y. Cui, A. Beyer, M.-F. Wu, S. G. Hilsenbeck, and S. A.W. Fuqua
Association between the Estrogen Receptor {alpha} A908G Mutation and Outcomes in Invasive Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2007; 13(11): 3235 - 3243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
P. E. Goss, J. N. Ingle, S. Martino, N. J. Robert, H. B. Muss, M. J. Piccart, M. Castiglione, D. Tu, L. E. Shepherd, K. I. Pritchard, et al.
Efficacy of Letrozole Extended Adjuvant Therapy According to Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor Status of the Primary Tumor: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group MA.17
J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2007; 25(15): 2006 - 2011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
L Mauriac, A Keshaviah, M Debled, H Mouridsen, J. Forbes, B Thurlimann, R Paridaens, A Monnier, I Lang, A Wardley, et al.
Predictors of early relapse in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in the BIG 1-98 trial
Ann. Onc., May 1, 2007; 18(5): 859 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
A. Bardia, L. C. Hartmann, C. M. Vachon, R. A. Vierkant, A. H. Wang, J. E. Olson, T. A. Sellers, and J. R. Cerhan
Recreational Physical Activity and Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Based on Hormone Receptor Status
Arch Intern Med, December 11, 2006; 166(22): 2478 - 2483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. G. Hicks, B. J. Yoder, S. Short, S. Tarr, N. Prescott, J. P. Crowe, A. E. Dawson, G. T. Budd, S. Sizemore, M. Cicek, et al.
Loss of Breast Cancer Metastasis Suppressor 1 Protein Expression Predicts Reduced Disease-Free Survival in Subsets of Breast Cancer Patients.
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2006; 12(22): 6702 - 6708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. Ejlertsen, H. T. Mouridsen, M.-B. Jensen, N.-O. Bengtsson, J. Bergh, S. Cold, P. Edlund, M. Ewertz, P. W. de Graaf, C. Kamby, et al.
Similar Efficacy for Ovarian Ablation Compared With Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil: From a Randomized Comparison of Premenopausal Patients With Node-Positive, Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2006; 24(31): 4956 - 4962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
X.-J. Ma, S. G. Hilsenbeck, W. Wang, L. Ding, D. C. Sgroi, R. A. Bender, C. K. Osborne, D. C. Allred, and M. G. Erlander
The HOXB13:IL17BR Expression Index Is a Prognostic Factor in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2006; 24(28): 4611 - 4619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. M. Nguyen, K. Sam, A. Tsimelzon, X. Li, H. Wong, S. Mohsin, G. M. Clark, S. G. Hilsenbeck, R. M. Elledge, D. C. Allred, et al.
Molecular Heterogeneity of Inflammatory Breast Cancer: A Hyperproliferative Phenotype
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2006; 12(17): 5047 - 5054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
B. Moy and P. E. Goss
Estrogen Receptor Pathway: Resistance to Endocrine Therapy and New Therapeutic Approaches.
Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2006; 12(16): 4790 - 4793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Stendahl, L. Ryden, B. Nordenskjold, P. E. Jonsson, G. Landberg, and K. Jirstrom
High Progesterone Receptor Expression Correlates to the Effect of Adjuvant Tamoxifen in Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2006; 12(15): 4614 - 4618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. Dowsett, J. Houghton, C. Iden, J. Salter, J. Farndon, R. A'Hern, R. Sainsbury, and M. Baum
Benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in primary breast cancer patients according oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, EGF receptor and HER2 status
Ann. Onc., May 1, 2006; 17(5): 818 - 826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. S. Oh, M. A. Troester, J. Usary, Z. Hu, X. He, C. Fan, J. Wu, L. A. Carey, and C. M. Perou
Estrogen-Regulated Genes Predict Survival in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancers
J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2006; 24(11): 1656 - 1664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. P. Goetz, V. J. Suman, J. N. Ingle, A. M. Nibbe, D. W. Visscher, C. A. Reynolds, W. L. Lingle, M. Erlander, X.-J. Ma, D. C. Sgroi, et al.
A two-gene expression ratio of homeobox 13 and interleukin-17B receptor for prediction of recurrence and survival in women receiving adjuvant tamoxifen.
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 12(7 Pt 1): 2080 - 2087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. E. Come
A 62-Year-Old Woman With a New Diagnosis of Breast Cancer
JAMA, March 22, 2006; 295(12): 1434 - 1442.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Olivier, A. Langerod, P. Carrieri, J. Bergh, S. Klaar, J. Eyfjord, C. Theillet, C. Rodriguez, R. Lidereau, I. Bieche, et al.
The Clinical Value of Somatic TP53 Gene Mutations in 1,794 Patients with Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2006; 12(4): 1157 - 1167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. P. Linke, T. M. Bremer, C. D. Herold, G. Sauter, and C. Diamond
A Multimarker Model to Predict Outcome in Tamoxifen-Treated Breast Cancer Patients
Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2006; 12(4): 1175 - 1183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
H.-J. Kim, X. Cui, S. G. Hilsenbeck, and A. V. Lee
Progesterone Receptor Loss Correlates with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Overexpression in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2006; 12(3): 1013s - 1018s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. G. Hilsenbeck and C. K. Osborne
Is There a Role for Adjuvant Tamoxifen in Progesterone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer? An In silico Clinical Trial
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2006; 12(3): 1049s - 1055s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
N. Normanno, M. Di Maio, E. De Maio, A. De Luca, A. de Matteis, A. Giordano, F. Perrone, and on behalf of the NCI-Naples Breast Cancer Group
Mechanisms of endocrine resistance and novel therapeutic strategies in breast cancer
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2005; 12(4): 721 - 747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
K Jirstrom, L Ryden, L Anagnostaki, B Nordenskjold, O Stal, S Thorstenson, G Chebil, P-E Jonsson, M Ferno, and G Landberg
Pathology parameters and adjuvant tamoxifen response in a randomised premenopausal breast cancer trial
J. Clin. Pathol., November 1, 2005; 58(11): 1135 - 1142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Dowsett, J. Cuzick, C. Wale, T. Howell, J. Houghton, and M. Baum
Retrospective Analysis of Time to Recurrence in the ATAC Trial According to Hormone Receptor Status: An Hypothesis-Generating Study
J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2005; 23(30): 7512 - 7517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
X. Cui, R. Schiff, G. Arpino, C. K. Osborne, and A. V. Lee
Biology of Progesterone Receptor Loss in Breast Cancer and Its Implications for Endocrine Therapy
J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2005; 23(30): 7721 - 7735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
G. Arpino, H. Weiss, A. V. Lee, R. Schiff, S. De Placido, C. K. Osborne, and R. M. Elledge
Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Progesterone Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer: Association With Growth Factor Receptor Expression and Tamoxifen Resistance
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 7, 2005; 97(17): 1254 - 1261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. Ryden, K. Jirstrom, P.-O. Bendahl, M. Ferno, B. Nordenskjold, O. Stal, S. Thorstenson, P.-E. Jonsson, and G. Landberg
Tumor-Specific Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 but Not Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor or Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Is Associated With Impaired Response to Adjuvant Tamoxifen in Premenopausal Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2005; 23(21): 4695 - 4704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Tovey, B. Dunne, C. J. Witton, A. Forsyth, T. G. Cooke, and J. M.S. Bartlett
Can Molecular Markers Predict When to Implement Treatment with Aromatase Inhibitors in Invasive Breast Cancer?
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2005; 11(13): 4835 - 4842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
A. Howell and A. M Wardley
Overview of the impact of conventional systemic therapies on breast cancer
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, July 1, 2005; 12(Supplement_1): S9 - S16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
M Dowsett, S Johnston, L-A Martin, J Salter, M Hills, S Detre, M C Gutierrez, S K Mohsin, J Shou, D C Allred, et al.
Growth factor signalling and response to endocrine therapy: the Royal Marsden Experience
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, July 1, 2005; 12(Supplement_1): S113 - S117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Colozza, D. Larsimont, and M.J. Piccart
Progesterone Receptor Testing: Not the Right Time to Be Buried
J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2005; 23(16): 3867 - 3868.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. Colomer, M. Beltran, J. Dorcas, H. Cortes-Funes, J. Hornedo, V. Valentin, C. Vargas, C. Mendiola, and E. Ciruelos
It Is Not Time to Stop Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2005; 23(16): 3868 - 3869.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
I. A. Olivotto, P. T. Truong, V. Bernstein, and J. K. Kelly
In Reply:
J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2005; 23(16): 3869 - 3870.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
H J Huang, P Neven, M Drijkoningen, R Paridaens, H Wildiers, E Van Limbergen, P Berteloot, F Amant, I Vergote, and M R Christiaens
Association between tumour characteristics and HER-2/neu by immunohistochemistry in 1362 women with primary operable breast cancer
J. Clin. Pathol., June 1, 2005; 58(6): 611 - 616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Dowsett, S. R. Ebbs, J. M. Dixon, A. Skene, C. Griffith, I. Boeddinghaus, J. Salter, S. Detre, M. Hills, S. Ashley, et al.
Biomarker Changes During Neoadjuvant Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, or the Combination: Influence of Hormonal Status and HER-2 in Breast Cancer--A Study from the IMPACT Trialists
J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2005; 23(11): 2477 - 2492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. J. Fabian and B. F. Kimler
Selective Estrogen-Receptor Modulators for Primary Prevention of Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2005; 23(8): 1644 - 1655.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
B. M. Jacobsen, S. A. Schittone, J. K. Richer, and K. B. Horwitz
Progesterone-Independent Effects of Human Progesterone Receptors (PRs) in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: PR Isoform-Specific Gene Regulation and Tumor Biology
Mol. Endocrinol., March 1, 2005; 19(3): 574 - 587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
M. J. Duffy
Predictive Markers in Breast and Other Cancers: A Review
Clin. Chem., March 1, 2005; 51(3): 494 - 503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. A.W. Fuqua, Y. Cui, A. V. Lee, C. K. Osborne, and K. B. Horwitz
Insights Into the Role of Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2005; 23(4): 931 - 932.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
I. A. Olivotto, V. Bernstein, P. T. Truong, and J. S. Kelly
In Reply:
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2005; 23(4): 932 - 933.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. K. Osborne, J. Shou, S. Massarweh, and R. Schiff
Crosstalk between Estrogen Receptor and Growth Factor Receptor Pathways as a Cause for Endocrine Therapy Resistance in Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2005; 11(2): 865s - 870s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
T. A. Hopp, H. L. Weiss, I. S. Parra, Y. Cui, C. K. Osborne, and S. A. W. Fuqua
Low Levels of Estrogen Receptor {beta} Protein Predict Resistance to Tamoxifen Therapy in Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2004; 10(22): 7490 - 7499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
O. Modlich, H.-B. Prisack, M. Munnes, W. Audretsch, and H. Bojar
Immediate Gene Expression Changes After the First Course of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer Disease
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2004; 10(19): 6418 - 6431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. C. Murphy, Y. Niu, L. Snell, and P. Watson
Phospho-Serine-118 Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} Expression Is Associated with Better Disease Outcome in Women Treated with Tamoxifen
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2004; 10(17): 5902 - 5906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. K. Biswas, Q. Shi, S. Baily, I. Strickland, S. Ghosh, A. B. Pardee, and J. D. Iglehart
NF-{kappa}B activation in human breast cancer specimens and its role in cell proliferation and apoptosis
PNAS, July 6, 2004; 101(27): 10137 - 10142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page