Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 20, Issue 11
(June), 2002: 2701-2712
© 2002 American Society for Clinical Oncology
BRCAPRO Validation, Sensitivity of Genetic Testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and Prevalence of Other Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes
By Donald A. Berry,
Edwin S. Iversen, Jr,
Daniel F. Gudbjartsson,
Elaine H. Hiller,
Judy E. Garber,
Beth N. Peshkin,
Caryn Lerman,
Patrice Watson,
Henry T. Lynch,
Susan G. Hilsenbeck,
Wendy S. Rubinstein,
Kevin S. Hughes,
Giovanni Parmigiani
From the Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, and Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Institute of Statistics and Decision Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard University, and Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and Lahey Clinic, Burlington, MA; Lombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Creighton University, Omaha, NE; Center for Medical Genetics, Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Evanston, IL; and Departments of Oncology and Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Address reprint requests to Donald A. Berry, PhD, Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Box 447, Houston, TX 77030-4009; email: dberry{at}mdanderson.org
PURPOSE: To compare genetic test results for deleterious mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 with estimated probabilities of carrying such mutations; to assess sensitivity of genetic testing; and to assess the relevance of other susceptibility genes in familial breast and ovarian cancer.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data analyzed were from six high-risk genetic counseling clinics and concern individuals from families for which at least one member was tested for mutations at BRCA1 and BRCA2. Predictions of genetic predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer for 301 individuals were made using BRCAPRO, a statistical model and software using Mendelian genetics and Bayesian updating. Model predictions were compared with the results of genetic testing.
RESULTS: Among the test individuals, 126 were Ashkenazi Jewish, three were male subjects, 243 had breast cancer, 49 had ovarian cancer, 34 were unaffected, and 139 tested positive for BRCA1 mutations and 29 for BRCA2 mutations. BRCAPRO performed well: for the 150 probands with the smallest BRCAPRO carrier probabilities (average, 29.0%), the proportion testing positive was 32.7%; for the 151 probands with the largest carrier probabilities (average, 95.2%), 78.8% tested positive. Genetic testing sensitivity was estimated to be at least 85%, with false-negatives including mutations of susceptibility genes heretofore unknown.
CONCLUSION: BRCAPRO is an accurate counseling tool for determining the probability of carrying mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 is highly sensitive, missing an estimated 15% of mutations. In the populations studied, breast cancer susceptibility genes other than BRCA1 and BRCA2 either do not exist, are rare, or are associated with low disease penetrance.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. W. Kurian, G. D. Gong, N. M. Chun, M. A. Mills, A. D. Staton, K. E. Kingham, B. B. Crawford, R. Lee, S. Chan, S. S. Donlon, et al.
Performance of BRCA1/2 Mutation Prediction Models in Asian Americans
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 10, 2008;
26(29):
4752 - 4758.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. R. Susswein, C. Skrzynia, L. A. Lange, J. K. Booker, M. L. Graham III, and J. P. Evans
Increased Uptake of BRCA1/2 Genetic Testing Among African American Women With a Recent Diagnosis of Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 1, 2008;
26(1):
32 - 36.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Huo and O. I. Olopade
Genetic Testing in Diverse Populations: Are Researchers Doing Enough to Get Out the Correct Message?
JAMA,
December 26, 2007;
298(24):
2910 - 2911.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. N. Weitzel, V. I. Lagos, and D. J. MacDonald
Limited Family Structure and Breast Cancer Risk Reply
JAMA,
November 7, 2007;
298(17):
2007 - 2008.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. J. Vogel, D. P. Atchley, J. Erlichman, K. R. Broglio, K. J. Ready, V. Valero, C. I. Amos, G. N. Hortobagyi, K. H. Lu, and B. Arun
BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genetic Testing in Hispanic Patients: Mutation Prevalence and Evaluation of the BRCAPRO Risk Assessment Model
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 10, 2007;
25(29):
4635 - 4641.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Parmigiani, S. Chen, E. S. Iversen Jr, T. M. Friebel, D. M. Finkelstein, H. Anton-Culver, A. Ziogas, B. L. Weber, A. Eisen, K. E. Malone, et al.
Validity of Models for Predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations
Ann Intern Med,
October 2, 2007;
147(7):
441 - 450.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. D. Lehman, C. Isaacs, M. D. Schnall, E. D. Pisano, S. M. Ascher, P. T. Weatherall, D. A. Bluemke, D. J. Bowen, P. K. Marcom, D. K. Armstrong, et al.
Cancer Yield of Mammography, MR, and US in High-Risk Women: Prospective Multi-Institution Breast Cancer Screening Study
Radiology,
August 1, 2007;
244(2):
381 - 388.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Robson and K. Offit
Management of an Inherited Predisposition to Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med.,
July 12, 2007;
357(2):
154 - 162.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Capalbo, A. Buffone, A. Vestri, E. Ricevuto, C. Rinaldi, M. Zani, S. Ferraro, L. Frati, I. Screpanti, A. Gulino, et al.
Does the Search for Large Genomic Rearrangements Impact BRCAPRO Carrier Prediction?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 20, 2007;
25(18):
2632 - 2634.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Parmigiani and D. A. Berry
In Reply
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 20, 2007;
25(18):
2634 - 2635.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Tischkowitz, B. Xia, N. Sabbaghian, J. S. Reis-Filho, N. Hamel, G. Li, E. H. van Beers, L. Li, T. Khalil, L. A. Quenneville, et al.
Analysis of PALB2/FANCN-associated breast cancer families
PNAS,
April 17, 2007;
104(16):
6788 - 6793.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Chen, E. S. Iversen Jr, and G. Parmigiani
In Reply
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 10, 2006;
24(20):
3313 - 3314.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. R. Palomares, J. R.B. Machia, C. D. Lehman, J. R. Daling, and A. McTiernan
Mammographic density correlation with gail model breast cancer risk estimates and component risk factors.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
July 1, 2006;
15(7):
1324 - 1330.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. J. Kelloff, S. M. Lippman, A. J. Dannenberg, C. C. Sigman, H. L. Pearce, B. J. Reid, E. Szabo, V. C. Jordan, M. R. Spitz, G. B. Mills, et al.
Progress in Chemoprevention Drug Development: The Promise of Molecular Biomarkers for Prevention of Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Cancer--A Plan to Move Forward
Clin. Cancer Res.,
June 15, 2006;
12(12):
3661 - 3697.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Hall and O. I. Olopade
Disparities in Genetic Testing: Thinking Outside the BRCA Box
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 10, 2006;
24(14):
2197 - 2203.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. James, R. Doherty, M. Harris, B. N. Mukesh, A. Milner, M.-A. Young, and C. Scott
Optimal Selection of Individuals for BRCA Mutation Testing: A Comparison of Available Methods
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 1, 2006;
24(4):
707 - 715.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. H. Barcenas, G.M. M. Hosain, B. Arun, J. Zong, X. Zhou, J. Chen, J. M. Cortada, G. B. Mills, G. E. Tomlinson, A. R. Miller, et al.
Assessing BRCA Carrier Probabilities in Extended Families
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 20, 2006;
24(3):
354 - 360.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. S. Larson, B. L. Schlechter, A. de las Morenas, J. E. Garber, L. A. Cupples, and C. L. Rosenberg
Allele Imbalance, or Loss of Heterozygosity, in Normal Breast Epithelium of Sporadic Breast Cancer Cases and BRCA1 Gene Mutation Carriers Is Increased Compared With Reduction Mammoplasty Tissues
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 1, 2005;
23(34):
8613 - 8619.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Nanda, L. P. Schumm, S. Cummings, J. D. Fackenthal, L. Sveen, F. Ademuyiwa, M. Cobleigh, L. Esserman, N. M. Lindor, S. L. Neuhausen, et al.
Genetic Testing in an Ethnically Diverse Cohort of High-Risk Women: A Comparative Analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in American Families of European and African Ancestry
JAMA,
October 19, 2005;
294(15):
1925 - 1933.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. D. Kauff, N. Mitra, M. E. Robson, K. E. Hurley, S. Chuai, D. Goldfrank, E. Wadsworth, J. Lee, T. Cigler, P. I. Borgen, et al.
Risk of Ovarian Cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation-Negative Hereditary Breast Cancer Families
J Natl Cancer Inst,
September 21, 2005;
97(18):
1382 - 1384.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. D. Nelson, L. H. Huffman, R. Fu, and E. L. Harris
Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Intern Med,
September 6, 2005;
143(5):
362 - 379.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Nekhlyudov, R. Li, and S. W. Fletcher
Information and Involvement Preferences of Women in Their 40s Before Their First Screening Mammogram
Arch Intern Med,
June 27, 2005;
165(12):
1370 - 1374.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. N. Freedman, D. Seminara, M. H. Gail, P. Hartge, G. A. Colditz, R. Ballard-Barbash, and R. M. Pfeiffer
Cancer Risk Prediction Models: A Workshop on Development, Evaluation, and Application
J Natl Cancer Inst,
May 18, 2005;
97(10):
715 - 723.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Armstrong, E. Micco, A. Carney, J. Stopfer, and M. Putt
Racial Differences in the Use of BRCA1/2 Testing Among Women With a Family History of Breast or Ovarian Cancer
JAMA,
April 13, 2005;
293(14):
1729 - 1736.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. B. Gomez-Garcia, T. Ambergen, M. J. Blok, and A. van den Wijngaard
Patients With an Unclassified Genetic Variant in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 Genes Show Different Clinical Features From Those With a Mutation
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 1, 2005;
23(10):
2185 - 2190.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Pal, J. Permuth-Wey, T. Holtje, and R. Sutphen
BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in a Study of African American Breast Cancer Patients
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
November 1, 2004;
13(11):
1794 - 1799.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Green, S. K. Peterson, M. W. Baker, G. R. Harper, L. C. Friedman, W. S. Rubinstein, and D. T. Mauger
Effect of a Computer-Based Decision Aid on Knowledge, Perceptions, and Intentions About Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer Susceptibility: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA,
July 28, 2004;
292(4):
442 - 452.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D G R Evans, D M Eccles, N Rahman, K Young, M Bulman, E Amir, A Shenton, A Howell, and F Lalloo
A new scoring system for the chances of identifying a BRCA1/2 mutation outperforms existing models including BRCAPRO
J. Med. Genet.,
June 1, 2004;
41(6):
474 - 480.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F Marroni, P Aretini, E D'Andrea, M A Caligo, L Cortesi, A Viel, E Ricevuto, M Montagna, G Cipollini, S Ferrari, et al.
Evaluation of widely used models for predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations
J. Med. Genet.,
April 1, 2004;
41(4):
278 - 285.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. J. van Asperen, M. A. Jonker, C. E. Jacobi, J. E. M. van Diemen-Homan, E. Bakker, M. H. Breuning, J. C. van Houwelingen, and G. H. de Bock
Risk Estimation for Healthy Women from Breast Cancer Families: New Insights and New Strategies
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
January 1, 2004;
13(1):
87 - 93.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Jonker, C. E. Jacobi, W. E. Hoogendoorn, N. J. D. Nagelkerke, G. H. de Bock, and J. C. van Houwelingen
Modeling Familial Clustered Breast Cancer Using Published Data
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
December 1, 2003;
12(12):
1479 - 1485.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. N. Weitzel, S. M. McCaffrey, R. Nedelcu, D. J. MacDonald, K. R. Blazer, and C. A. Cullinane
Effect of Genetic Cancer Risk Assessment on Surgical Decisions at Breast Cancer Diagnosis
Arch Surg,
December 1, 2003;
138(12):
1323 - 1328.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. D. McKelvey Jr. and J. P. Evans
Cancer Genetics in Primary Care
J. Nutr.,
November 1, 2003;
133(11):
3767S - 3772.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. L. Sabichi, M.-F. Demierre, E. T. Hawk, C. E. Lerman, and S. M. Lippman
Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Res.,
September 15, 2003;
63(18):
5649 - 5655.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P Watson, S A Narod, R Fodde, A Wagner, J F Lynch, S T Tinley, C L Snyder, S A Coronel, B Riley, Y Kinarsky, et al.
Carrier risk status changes resulting from mutation testing in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer and hereditary breast-ovarian cancer
J. Med. Genet.,
August 1, 2003;
40(8):
591 - 596.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. W. Fletcher and J. G. Elmore
Mammographic Screening for Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med.,
April 24, 2003;
348(17):
1672 - 1680.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Domchek, A. Eisen, K. Calzone, J. Stopfer, A. Blackwood, and B. L. Weber
Application of Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Models in Clinical Practice
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 15, 2003;
21(4):
593 - 601.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. T. Lynch, C. L. Snyder, J. F. Lynch, B. D. Riley, and W. S. Rubinstein
Hereditary Breast-Ovarian Cancer at the Bedside: Role of the Medical Oncologist
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 15, 2003;
21(4):
740 - 753.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Ottini, G. Masala, C. D'Amico, B. Mancini, C. Saieva, G. Aceto, D. Gestri, V. Vezzosi, M. Falchetti, M. De Marco, et al.
BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Status and Tumor Characteristics in Male Breast Cancer: A Population-based Study in Italy
Cancer Res.,
January 15, 2003;
63(2):
342 - 347.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Pichert, B. Bolliger, K. Buser, and O. Pagani
Evidence-based management options for women at increased breast/ovarian cancer risk
Ann. Onc.,
January 1, 2003;
14(1):
9 - 19.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Bonadona, O. M. Sinilnikova, G. M. Lenoir, and C. Lasset
Re: Pretest Prediction of BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation by Risk Counselors and the Computer Model BRCAPRO
J Natl Cancer Inst,
October 16, 2002;
94(20):
1582 - 1583.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Cremin, N. Wong, K. Buzaglo, A.-J. Paradis, W. Foulkes, D.A. Berry, G. Parmigiani, W. Rubinstein, and P. Watson
Nonovarian Pelvic Cancers in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers and the BRCAPRO Statistical Model
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 15, 2002;
20(18):
3936 - 3937.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N D Kauff, P Perez-Segura, M E Robson, L Scheuer, B Siegel, A Schluger, B Rapaport, T S Frank, K Nafa, N A Ellis, et al.
Incidence of non-founder BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in high risk Ashkenazi breast and ovarian cancer families
J. Med. Genet.,
August 1, 2002;
39(8):
611 - 614.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|