Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casarett, D.
Right arrow Articles by Abrahm, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Casarett, D.
Right arrow Articles by Abrahm, J. L.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 19, Issue 7 (April), 2001: 2057-2063
© 2001 American Society for Clinical Oncology

Patients With Cancer Referred to Hospice Versus a Bridge Program: Patient Characteristics, Needs for Care, and Survival

By David Casarett, Janet L. Abrahm

From the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, The University of Pennsylvania Department of Medicine Division of Geriatrics and Division of Hematology Oncology, and the Institute on Aging and the Center for Bioethics, Philadelphia, PA.

Supported by a Career Development Award from the Department of Veterans Affairs (D.C.).Address reprint requests to David Casarett, MD, MA, Institute on Aging, Center for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania, 3615 Chestnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19104; email: casarett{at}mail.med.upenn.edu

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the characteristics and needs of patients with advanced cancer who were referred to hospice with those referred to a prehospice "bridge" program that is staffed by hospice nurses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were gathered through retrospective review of computerized clinical records using precoded data fields of 284 patients with cancer enrolled in a bridge program and 1,000 who enrolled in a hospice program. Patient characteristics, needs for supportive care at the time of enrollment, and survival were assessed.

RESULTS: Bridge patients were less likely to have Medicare or Medicaid (43% v 72%; odds ratio, 0.30; P < .001) and were younger (69 v 73 years, rank sum test; P < .001), more likely to be married (59% v 43%; odds ratio, 1.90; P < .001), and more likely to be in the highest income category (14% v 10%; odds ratio, 1.77; P = .009). Bridge patients had at least as many needs for care as did patients in hospice. Bridge patients lived significantly longer (median, 46 v 19 days; log-rank test of survivor functions, P < .001).

CONCLUSION: Patients referred to this bridge program had prognoses that are significantly better than those of patients who enter hospice, but they have needs for supportive care that are at least as great. These findings underscore the importance of initiatives to extend some of the benefits of hospice care to a wider population of patients and should encourage the analysis of similar programs’ ability to meet these needs.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Oncol PractHome page
The Debate in Hospice Care
J. Oncol. Pract, May 1, 2008; 4(3): 153 - 157.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. Casarett, J. Fishman, P. J. O'Dwyer, F. K. Barg, M. Naylor, and D. A. Asch
How Should We Design Supportive Cancer Care? The Patient's Perspective
J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2008; 26(8): 1296 - 1301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
J. Kwak, W. E. Haley, and D. A. Chiriboga
Racial Differences in Hospice Use and In-Hospital Death Among Medicare and Medicaid Dual-Eligible Nursing Home Residents
Gerontologist, February 1, 2008; 48(1): 32 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
K. S. Johnson, M. Kuchibhatla, D. Tanis, and J. A. Tulsky
Racial Differences in Hospice Revocation to Pursue Aggressive Care
Arch Intern Med, January 28, 2008; 168(2): 218 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CAREHome page
D. M. Mintzer and K. Zagrabbe
On How Increasing Numbers of Newer Cancer Therapies Further Delay Referral to Hospice: The Increasing Palliative Care Imperative
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, April 1, 2007; 24(2): 126 - 130.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
D. J. Casarett and T. E. Quill
"I'm Not Ready for Hospice": Strategies for Timely and Effective Hospice Discussions
Ann Intern Med, March 20, 2007; 146(6): 443 - 449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
T. Morita, T. Akechi, M. Ikenaga, Y. Kizawa, H. Kohara, T. Mukaiyama, T. Nakaho, N. Nakashima, Y. Shima, T. Matsubara, et al.
Late Referrals to Specialized Palliative Care Service in Japan
J. Clin. Oncol., April 20, 2005; 23(12): 2637 - 2644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
M. Ahlner-Elmqvist, M. S Jordhoy, M. Jannert, P. Fayers, and S. Kaasa
Place of death: hospital-based advanced home care versus conventional care: A prospective study in palliative cancer care
Palliative Medicine, October 1, 2004; 18(7): 585 - 593.
[Abstract] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online