Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 19, Issue 17
(September), 2001: 3733-3739
© 2001 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Body-Surface AreaBased Dosing Does Not Increase Accuracy of Predicting Cisplatin Exposure
By Felix E. de Jongh,
Jaap Verweij,
Walter J. Loos,
Ronald de Wit,
Maja J.A. de Jonge,
André S.T. Planting,
Kees Nooter,
Gerrit Stoter,
Alex Sparreboom
From the Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam Cancer Institute (Daniel den Hoed Kliniek) and University Hospital Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Address reprint requests to Alex Sparreboom, PhD, Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam Cancer Institute (Daniel den Hoed Kliniek) and University Hospital Rotterdam, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA Rotterdam, the Netherlands; email: sparreboom{at}onch.azr.nl
PURPOSE: Most anticancer drugs are dosed based on body-surface area (BSA) to reduce interindividual variability of drug effects. We evaluated the relevance of this concept for cisplatin by analyzing cisplatin pharmacokinetics obtained in prospective studies in a large patient population.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from 268 adult patients (163 males/105 females; median age, 54 years [range, 21 to 74 years]) with advanced solid tumors treated in phase I/II trials with cisplatin monotherapy or combination chemotherapy with etoposide, irinotecan, topotecan, or docetaxel. Cisplatin was administered either weekly (n = 93) or once every 3 weeks (n = 175) at dose levels of 50 to 100 mg/m2 (3-hour infusion). Analysis of 485 complete courses was based on measurement of total and nonprotein-bound cisplatin in plasma by atomic absorption spectrometry.
RESULTS: No pharmacokinetic interaction was found between cisplatin and the anticancer drugs used in combination therapies. A linear correlation was observed between area under the curves of unbound and total cisplatin (r = 0.63). The mean plasma clearance of unbound cisplatin (CLfree) was 57.1 ± 14.7 L/h (range, 31.0 to 116 L/h), with an interpatient variability of 25.6%. BSA varied between 1.43 and 2.40 m2 (mean, 1.86 ± 0.19 m2), with an interpatient variability of 10.4%. When CLfree was corrected for BSA, interindividual variability remained in the same order (23.6 v 25.6%). Only a weak correlation was found between CLfree and BSA (r = 0.42). Intrapatient variability in CLfree, calculated from 90 patients was 12.1% ± 7.8% (range, 0.30% to 32.7%).
CONCLUSION: In view of the high interpatient variability in CLfree relative to variation in observed BSA, no rationale for continuing BSA-based dosing was found. We recommend fixed-dosing regimens for cisplatin.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. E. Broker, M. Valdivieso, M. J. Pilat, P. DeLuca, X. Zhou, S. Parker, G. Giaccone, and P. M. LoRusso
Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetic Behavior of the Potent Oral Taxane BMS-275183
Clin. Cancer Res.,
July 1, 2008;
14(13):
4186 - 4191.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. K. Filipski, W. J. Loos, J. Verweij, and A. Sparreboom
Interaction of Cisplatin with the Human Organic Cation Transporter 2
Clin. Cancer Res.,
June 15, 2008;
14(12):
3875 - 3880.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Sparreboom, A. C. Wolff, R. H.J. Mathijssen, E. Chatelut, E. K. Rowinsky, J. Verweij, and S. D. Baker
Evaluation of Alternate Size Descriptors for Dose Calculation of Anticancer Drugs in the Obese
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 20, 2007;
25(30):
4707 - 4713.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. H.J. Mathijssen, F. A. de Jong, W. J. Loos, J. M. van der Bol, J. Verweij, and A. Sparreboom
Flat-Fixed Dosing Versus Body Surface Area Based Dosing of Anticancer Drugs in Adults: Does It Make a Difference?
Oncologist,
August 1, 2007;
12(8):
913 - 923.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Hempel and J. Boos
Flat-Fixed Dosing Versus Body Surface Area Based Dosing of Anticancer Drugs: There Is a Difference
Oncologist,
August 1, 2007;
12(8):
924 - 926.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Laurie, K Ding, M Whitehead, R Feld, N Murray, F. Shepherd, and L Seymour
The impact of anemia on outcome of chemoradiation for limited small-cell lung cancer: a combined analysis of studies of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group
Ann. Onc.,
June 1, 2007;
18(6):
1051 - 1055.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Kloft, J. Wallin, A. Henningsson, E. Chatelut, and M. O. Karlsson
Population Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Model for Neutropenia with Patient Subgroup Identification: Comparison across Anticancer Drugs.
Clin. Cancer Res.,
September 15, 2006;
12(18):
5481 - 5490.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Gurney
Developing a New Framework for Dose Calculation
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 1, 2006;
24(10):
1489 - 1490.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. J. Loos, F. E. de Jongh, A. Sparreboom, R. de Wit, D. M. van Boven-van Zomeren, G. Stoter, K. Nooter, and J. Verweij
Evaluation of an Alternate Dosing Strategy for Cisplatin in Patients With Extreme Body Surface Area Values
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 1, 2006;
24(10):
1499 - 1506.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J.A. de Jonge, A. van der Gaast, A. S.T. Planting, L. van Doorn, A. Lems, I. Boot, J. Wanders, M. Satomi, and J. Verweij
Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of the Dolastatin 10 Analogue TZT-1027, Given on Days 1 and 8 of a 3-Week Cycle in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors
Clin. Cancer Res.,
May 15, 2005;
11(10):
3806 - 3813.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Yamamoto, T. Tamura, H. Murakami, T. Shimoyama, H. Nokihara, Y. Ueda, I. Sekine, H. Kunitoh, Y. Ohe, T. Kodama, et al.
Randomized Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of Docetaxel: Dosing Based on Body-Surface Area Compared With Individualized Dosing Based on Cytochrome P450 Activity Estimated Using a Urinary Metabolite of Exogenous Cortisol
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 20, 2005;
23(6):
1061 - 1069.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. C. Zamboni, L. L. Jung, M. J. Egorin, D. M. Potter, D. M. Friedland, C. P. Belani, S. S. Agarwala, M. M. W. Wong, M. Fakih, D. L. Trump, et al.
Phase I and Pharmacologic Study of Intermittently Administered 9-Nitrocamptothecin in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors
Clin. Cancer Res.,
August 1, 2004;
10(15):
5058 - 5064.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Kouno, N. Katsumata, H. Mukai, M. Ando, and T. Watanabe
Standardization of the Body Surface Area (BSA) Formula to Calculate the Dose of Anticancer Agents in Japan
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 1, 2003;
33(6):
309 - 313.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. H. Smorenburg, A. Sparreboom, M. Bontenbal, G. Stoter, K. Nooter, and J. Verweij
Randomized Cross-Over Evaluation of Body-Surface Area-Based Dosing Versus Flat-Fixed Dosing of Paclitaxel
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 15, 2003;
21(2):
197 - 202.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Alexandre, M. Gross-Goupil, B. Falissard, M.-L. Nguyen, J.-M. Gornet, J.-L. Misset, and F. Goldwasser
Evaluation of the nutritional and inflammatory status in cancer patients for the risk assessment of severe haematological toxicity following chemotherapy
Ann. Onc.,
January 1, 2003;
14(1):
36 - 41.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. D. Baker, J. Verweij, E. K. Rowinsky, R. C. Donehower, J. H. M. Schellens, L. B. Grochow, and A. Sparreboom
Role of Body Surface Area in Dosing of Investigational Anticancer Agents in Adults, 1991-2001
J Natl Cancer Inst,
December 18, 2002;
94(24):
1883 - 1888.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Schuler, A. Sparreboom, F. de Jongh, and J. Verweij
Cautious Arguments in Favor of Body Surface Area-Based Dosing
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 15, 2002;
20(20):
4270 - 4271.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. E. Order, W. Court, F. E. de Jongh, J. Verweij, and A. Sparreboom
When the Mirror Doesn't Reflect It at All
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 15, 2002;
20(4):
1144 - 1144.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. H.J. Mathijssen, J. Verweij, M. J.A. de Jonge, K. Nooter, G. Stoter, and A. Sparreboom
Impact of Body-Size Measures on Irinotecan Clearance: Alternative Dosing Recommendations
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 1, 2002;
20(1):
81 - 87.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|