Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nagtegaal, I. D.
Right arrow Articles by van Krieken, J. H. J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nagtegaal, I. D.
Right arrow Articles by van Krieken, J. H. J. M.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 18, Issue 8 (April), 2000: 1771-1779
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Oncology

Pathology Data in the Central Databases of Multicenter Randomized Trials Need to Be Based on Pathology Reports and Controlled by Trained Quality Managers

By I. D. Nagtegaal, E. Klein Kranenbarg, J. Hermans, C. J. H. van de Velde, J. H. J. M. van Krieken and the Pathology Review Committee

From the Departments of PathologySurgery, and Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, and Department of Pathology, University Medical Center St Radboud, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Address reprint requests to J.H.J.M. van Krieken, MD, PhD, Department of Pathology, University Medical Center St Radboud, PO Box 9101, 6500HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands; email J.vanKrieken@ pathol.azn.nl.

PURPOSE: Randomized multicenter trials form the basis of health care development. Regarding cancer research, pathology data are crucial. To maintain the quality of these trials, the auditing of subsequent processes is necessary. The aim of the present study was to examine the completeness and accuracy of data obtained from a special-purpose standardized pathology form compared with the data available through traditional hospital pathology reports.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective comparison of pathology data case record forms with hospital pathology reports was performed using the data from 300 patients with primary rectal cancer. All of these patients had been included in a large multicenter trial in the Netherlands. Three independent audits were carried out. Special attention was given to the accuracy of parameters, which are important for prognosis and treatment decisions. Furthermore, various factors that possibly influence the occurrence of errors were investigated.

RESULTS: Quality control of the pathology data revealed a high accuracy of 86.5% of all data items. However, only one third of the forms were complete and correct. Missing values were most prominent in the number of lymph nodes examined, whereas most errors were made in relation to the circumferential margin. Trained review pathologists made fewer major errors. Discrepancies were detected in all control rounds.

CONCLUSION: Successive rounds of quality control are required for accuracy and completeness of pathology data in multicenter trials. In addition to the special-purpose pathology forms, original pathology reports have to be collected, and the data should also be controlled by a trained pathology quality manager.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
P. de Heer, M. J.E.M. Gosens, E. C. de Bruin, N. G. Dekker-Ensink, H. Putter, C. A.M. Marijnen, A. J.C. van den Brule, J. H. J.M. van Krieken, H. J.T. Rutten, P. J.K. Kuppen, et al.
Cyclooxygenase 2 Expression in Rectal Cancer Is of Prognostic Significance in Patients Receiving Preoperative Radiotherapy
Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2007; 13(10): 2955 - 2960.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
I. D. Nagtegaal, C. J.H. van de Velde, E. van der Worp, E. Kapiteijn, P. Quirke, and J. H. J.M. van Krieken
Macroscopic Evaluation of Rectal Cancer Resection Specimen: Clinical Significance of the Pathologist in Quality Control
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2002; 20(7): 1729 - 1734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. A.M. Marijnen, E. Kapiteijn, C. J.H. van de Velde, H. Martijn, W. H. Steup, T. Wiggers, E. K. Kranenbarg, and J. W.H. Leer
Acute Side Effects and Complications After Short-Term Preoperative Radiotherapy Combined With Total Mesorectal Excision in Primary Rectal Cancer: Report of a Multicenter Randomized Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2002; 20(3): 817 - 825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
E. Kapiteijn, C. A.M. Marijnen, I. D. Nagtegaal, H. Putter, W. H. Steup, T. Wiggers, H. J.T. Rutten, L. Pahlman, B. Glimelius, J. H. J.M. van Krieken, et al.
Preoperative Radiotherapy Combined with Total Mesorectal Excision for Resectable Rectal Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., August 30, 2001; 345(9): 638 - 646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C.A.M. Marijnen, I.D. Nagtegaal, E. K. Kranenbarg, J. Hermans, C.J.H. van de Velde, J.W.H. Leer, and J.H.J.M. van Krieken
No Downstaging After Short-Term Preoperative Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer Patients
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2001; 19(7): 1976 - 1984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online