Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mille, D.
Right arrow Articles by Philip, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mille, D.
Right arrow Articles by Philip, T.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 18, Issue 8 (April), 2000: 1718-1724
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Oncology

Economic Impact of Harmonizing Medical Practices: Compliance With Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Follow-Up of Breast Cancer in a French Comprehensive Cancer Center

By Dominique Mille, Thomas Roy, Marie-Odile Carrère, Isabelle Ray, Nora Ferdjaoui, Hans-Martin Späth, Franck Chauvin, Thierry Philip

From the Groupe de Recherche Économie de la Santé et Réseaux de soins en CancérologieUnité Mixte de Recherche 5823 du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Centre Régional Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.

Address reprint requests to Marie-Odile Carrère, MD, Groupe de Recherche Économie de la Santé et Réseaux de soins en Cancérologie, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Rue Laennec, 69008 Lyon, France; email carrere{at}lyon.fnclcc.fr

PURPOSE: The introduction of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and the increasing desire to harmonize clinical practices draw attention to the economic impact of these trends. In 1994, CPGs were introduced in a French Comprehensive Cancer Center (Centre Régional Léon Bérard, Lyon). We evaluated the application of these CPGs in addition to the consequences of harmonizing clinical practices with respect to the distribution of resources by specifically analyzing the posttherapeutic follow-up of patients with localized breast cancer.

METHODS: A before-and-after analysis of the records of patients who received posttherapeutic follow-up for localized breast cancer as of either 1993 or 1995 was performed. Two hundred records were chosen at random, 100 from 1993 and 100 from 1995. Follow-up was continued for as long as possible and CPG compliance was studied for each year of the follow-up periods.

RESULTS: Follow-up that was not CPG-compliant required a significantly greater amount of resources. This difference was due to neither consultations nor mammographies, but was due to other examinations that were systematically performed without any warning signs to justify them. Depending on the follow-up year, noncompliant follow-up cost the Social Security from 2.2 to 3.6 times more than compliant follow-up. A noticeable change in medical practices was observed after the introduction of CPGs in 1994. This was confirmed by a sharp decrease in mean Social Security expenditure per patient of more than one third between 1993 and 1995, regardless of the follow-up year considered.

CONCLUSION: In the follow-up of patients with localized breast cancer, a large decrease in costs has been observed along with the evolution of medical practices toward CPG compliance. This finding is probably generalizable to other settings, but there is nothing that proves that it is applicable to other treatment strategies.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
J. L. Khatcheressian, A. C. Wolff, T. J. Smith, E. Grunfeld, H. B. Muss, V. G. Vogel, F. Halberg, M. R. Somerfield, and N. E. Davidson
American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 Update of the Breast Cancer Follow-Up and Management Guidelines in the Adjuvant Setting
J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2006; 24(31): 5091 - 5097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. L. Khatcheressian and T. J. Smith
Randomized Trial of Long-Term Follow-Up for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Family Physician Versus Specialist Care
J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2006; 24(6): 835 - 837.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
J. Mandelblatt, C. Armetta, K. R. Yabroff, W. Liang, and W. Lawrence
Descriptive Review of the Literature on Breast Cancer Outcomes: 1990 Through 2000
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2004; 2004(33): 8 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
M. Cruz-Correa, C. P. Gross, M. I. Canto, M. Cabana, R. E. Sampliner, J. P. Waring, C. McNeil-Solis, and N. R. Powe
The Impact of Practice Guidelines in the Management of Barrett Esophagus: A National Prospective Cohort Study of Physicians
Arch Intern Med, November 26, 2001; 161(21): 2588 - 2595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online