Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 18, Issue 7
(April), 2000: 1517-1524
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Use of Recombinant Human Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor to Increase Chemotherapy Dose-Intensity: A Randomized Trial in Very High-Risk Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
By G. Michel,
J. Landman-Parker,
M. F. Auclerc,
C. Mathey,
T. Leblanc,
E. Legall,
P. Bordigoni,
J. P. Lamagnere,
F. Demeocq,
Y. Perel,
A. Auvrignon,
C. Berthou,
F. Bauduer,
B. Pautard,
P. Schneider,
G. Schaison,
G. Leverger,
A. Baruchel
From the University Hospital Centers at Marseille, Paris-Trousseau, Paris-St Louis, Rennes, Nancy, Tours, Clermont-Ferrand, Bordeaux, Brest, Bayonne, Amiens, and Rouen, France.
Address reprint requests to Gérard Michel, MD, Pédiatrie et Hématologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital dEnfants La Timone, 264 Rue St Pierre, 13385, Marseille Cedex 05, France; email gmichel{at}ap-hm.fr
PURPOSE: To determine whether the use of a recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor ([G-CSF] lenogastrim) can increase the chemotherapy dose-intensity (CDI) delivered during consolidation chemotherapy of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-seven children with very high-risk ALL were randomized (slow early response to therapy, 55 patients; translocation t(9;22) or t(4;11), 12 patients). Consolidation consisted of six courses of chemotherapy; the first, third, and fifth courses were a combination of high-dose cytarabine, etoposide, and dexamethasone (R3), whereas the second, fourth, and sixth courses included vincristine, prednisone, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and methotrexate (COPADM). G-CSF was given after each course, and the next scheduled course was started as soon as neutrophil count was > 1 x 109/L and platelet count was > 100 x 109/L. CDI was calculated using the interval from day 1 of the first course to hematologic recovery after the fifth course (100% CDI = 105-day interval).
RESULTS: CDI was significantly increased in the G-CSF group compared with the nonG-CSF group (mean ± 95% confidence interval, 105 ± 5% v 91 ± 4%; P < .001). This higher intensity was a result of shorter post-R3 intervals in the G-CSF group, whereas the post-COPADM intervals were not statistically reduced. After the R3 courses, the number of days with fever and intravenous antibiotics and duration of hospitalization were significantly decreased by G-CSF, whereas reductions observed after COPADM were not statistically significant. Duration of granulocytopenia was reduced in the G-CSF group, but thrombocytopenia was prolonged, and the number of platelet transfusions was increased. Finally, the 3-year probability of event-free survival was not different between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: G-CSF can increase CDI in high-risk childhood ALL. Its effects depend on the chemotherapy regimen given before G-CSF administration. In our study, a higher CDI did not improve disease control.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Ballerini, J. Landman-Parker, J. M. Cayuela, V. Asnafi, M. Labopin, V. Gandemer, Y. Perel, G. Michel, T. Leblanc, C. Schmitt, et al.
Impact of genotype on survival of children with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated according to the French protocol FRALLE-93: the effect of TLX3/HOX11L2 gene expression on outcome
Haematologica,
November 1, 2008;
93(11):
1658 - 1665.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Sung, P. C. Nathan, S. M.H. Alibhai, G. A. Tomlinson, and J. Beyene
Meta-analysis: Effect of Prophylactic Hematopoietic Colony-Stimulating Factors on Mortality and Outcomes of Infection
Ann Intern Med,
September 18, 2007;
147(6):
400 - 411.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Lehrnbecher, M. Zimmermann, D. Reinhardt, M. Dworzak, J. Stary, and U. Creutzig
Prophylactic human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after induction therapy in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia
Blood,
February 1, 2007;
109(3):
936 - 943.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Sung, J. Beyene, J. Hayden, P. C. Nathan, B. Lange, and G. A. Tomlinson
A Bayesian Meta-analysis of Prophylactic Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor and Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor in Children with Cancer
Am. J. Epidemiol.,
May 1, 2006;
163(9):
811 - 817.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Sung, P. C. Nathan, B. Lange, J. Beyene, and G. R. Buchanan
Prophylactic Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor and Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Decrease Febrile Neutropenia After Chemotherapy in Children With Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 15, 2004;
22(16):
3350 - 3356.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Heath, P. G. Steinherz, A. Altman, H. Sather, S. Jhanwar, S. Halpern, R. Pieters, N. Shah, L. Steinherz, R. Tannous, et al.
Human Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Children With High-Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Children's Cancer Group Study
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 15, 2003;
21(8):
1612 - 1617.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Boissel, M.-F. Auclerc, V. Lheritier, Y. Perel, X. Thomas, T. Leblanc, P. Rousselot, J.-M. Cayuela, J. Gabert, N. Fegueux, et al.
Should Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Be Treated as Old Children or Young Adults? Comparison of the French FRALLE-93 and LALA-94 Trials
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 1, 2003;
21(5):
774 - 780.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Ballerini, A. Blaise, M. Busson-Le Coniat, X. Y. Su, J. Zucman-Rossi, M. Adam, J. van den Akker, C. Perot, B. Pellegrino, J. Landman-Parker, et al.
HOX11L2 expression defines a clinical subtype of pediatric T-ALL associated with poor prognosis
Blood,
July 18, 2002;
100(3):
991 - 997.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Patte, A. Laplanche, A. I. Bertozzi, A. Baruchel, D. Frappaz, C. Schmitt, F. Mechinaud, B. Nelken, P. Boutard, and J. Michon
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Induction Treatment of Children With Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Randomized Study of the French Society of Pediatric Oncology
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 15, 2002;
20(2):
441 - 448.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|