Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Newlands, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Rustin, G. J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Newlands, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Rustin, G. J. S.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 18, Issue 4 (February), 2000: 854
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Oncology

Etoposide and Cisplatin/Etoposide, Methotrexate, and Actinomycin D (EMA) Chemotherapy for Patients With High-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Tumors Refractory to EMA/Cyclophosphamide and Vincristine Chemotherapy and Patients Presenting With Metastatic Placental Site Trophoblastic Tumors

By E. S. Newlands, P. J. Mulholland, L. Holden, M. J. Seckl, G. J. S. Rustin

From the Department of Medical Oncology, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Address reprint requests to E.S. Newlands, Department of Medical Oncology, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Rd, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom; email e.newlands{at}ic.ac.uk

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of etoposide, cisplatin/etoposide, methotrexate, and actinomycin D (EP/EMA) chemotherapy in patients with gestational trophoblastic tumors (GTTs), who have relapsed after or who have become refractory to EMA/cyclophosphamide and vincristine (CO) chemotherapy, and in patients presenting with metastatic placental site trophoblastic tumors (PSTTs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have treated a total of 34 patients with GTT and eight patients with metastatic PSTT with the EP/EMA chemotherapy schedule.

RESULTS: Twenty-two patients received EP/EMA because of apparent drug resistance to EMA/CO, and because the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) was near normal, they were not assessable for response. Twenty-one of these patients (95%) are alive and in remission. In the group where the hCG was high enough to confirm a response (greater than one log fall in hCG) to EP/EMA, all 12 patients responded and nine of these patients (75%) are alive and in remission. We have treated three patients with PSTT where the interval from antecedent pregnancy was less than 2 years, and all patients (100%) are alive and in remission. We have treated five patients where the interval from antecedent pregnancy was greater than 2 years and one fifth (20%) remain in remission. The survival for patients with GTT is 30 (88%) out of 34 patients and four (50%) out of eight patients for PSTT, giving an overall survival for these two cohorts of 34 (81%) out of 42 patients. The toxicity of this schedule is significant, with grade 3 or 4 toxicity (National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria) recorded in hemoglobin (21%), WBC (68%), and platelets (40%). The role of surgery in this group of patients is important and contributed to sustained remission in five patients (23%) and possibly helped an additional seven patients (32%).

CONCLUSION: EP/EMA is an effective but moderately toxic regimen for patients with high-risk GTT who become refractory to or relapse from EMA/CO chemotherapy. Also, EP/EMA clearly has activity in patients with metastatic PSTT.

The Choriocarcinoma Service is funded by the National Specialist Commissioning Advisory Group of the Department of Health, London, United Kingdom.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
J. Wang, D. Short, N. J. Sebire, I. Lindsay, E. S. Newlands, P. Schmid, P. M. Savage, and M. J. Seckl
Salvage chemotherapy of relapsed or high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) with paclitaxel/cisplatin alternating with paclitaxel/etoposide (TP/TE)
Ann. Onc., September 1, 2008; 19(9): 1578 - 1583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Oncol Pharm PractHome page
K. Collier, C. Schink, A. M. Young, K. How, M. Seckl, and P. Savage
Successful treatment with etoposide phosphate in patients with previous etoposide hypersensitivity
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, March 1, 2008; 14(1): 51 - 55.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
Errata
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2004; 103(4): 799 - 799.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
I. A. McNeish, S. Strickland, L. Holden, G. J.S. Rustin, M. Foskett, M. J. Seckl, and E. S. Newlands
Low-Risk Persistent Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: Outcome After Initial Treatment With Low-Dose Methotrexate and Folinic Acid From 1992 to 2000
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2002; 20(7): 1838 - 1844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online