This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fujiwaki, R. Articles by Miyazaki, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fujiwaki, R. Articles by Miyazaki, K.

Gene Expression for Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase and Thymidine Phosphorylase Influences Outcome in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shimane Medical University, Izumo, and Department of Pathology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.

Address reprint requests to Kohkichi Hata, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shimane Medical University, Izumo 693-8501, Japan; email hata31{at}shimane-med.ac.jp

PURPOSE: Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is a pyrimidine salvage enzyme responsible for degradation of thymine, which is produced from thymidine by thymidine phosphorylase (TP). Our purpose was to determine whether DPD affects prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and how the two enzymes may interact in such effects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: DPD gene expression was analyzed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in 27 samples from normal ovaries and the 85 epithelial ovarian cancers previously studied with regard to TP gene expression.

RESULTS: DPD gene expression was significantly lower in epithelial ovarian cancers than in normal ovaries (P < .0001), whereas TP gene expression and the ratio of TP to DPD gene expression (TP:DPD) were significantly higher in epithelial ovarian cancer (P < .0001 for both). In patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, DPD gene expression and the TP:DPD ratio did not significantly correlate with any clinicopathologic factors. Patients with a high TP:DPD ratio (higher than the median) had significantly poorer outcomes than those with lower ratios (P = .0002). The difference in survival between groups with high and low TP:DPD ratios was greater than the difference between groups with high and low TP gene expression. Multivariate analysis showed the TP:DPD ratio to be the independent prognostic factor (P = .0002). In tumors with high TP gene expression, low DPD gene expression significantly correlated with poor survival (P = .04).

CONCLUSION: Downregulation of DPD gene expression may enhance the negative prognostic effect of high TP gene expression in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Certain newly available chemotherapeutic choices may take the TP:DPD ratio into consideration.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Denkert, J. Budczies, T. Kind, W. Weichert, P. Tablack, J. Sehouli, S. Niesporek, D. Konsgen, M. Dietel, and O. Fiehn Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolic Profiling Reveals Different Metabolite Patterns in Invasive Ovarian Carcinomas and Ovarian Borderline Tumors. Cancer Res., November 15, 2006; 66(22): 10795 - 10804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Gardiner and E. J. Begg Pharmacogenetics, Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes, and Clinical Practice Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2006; 58(3): 521 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Dermime, A. Armstrong, R. E Hawkins, and P. L Stern Cancer vaccines and immunotherapy Br. Med. Bull., July 1, 2002; 62(1): 149 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]