Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elting, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bodey, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elting, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bodey, G.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 18, Issue 21 (November), 2000: 3699-3706
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Oncology

Time to Clinical Response: An Outcome of Antibiotic Therapy of Febrile Neutropenia With Implications for Quality and Cost of Care

By Linda S. Elting, Edward B. Rubenstein, Kenneth Rolston, Scott B. Cantor, Charles G. Martin, Danna Kurtin, Saul Rodriguez, Tony Lam, Krishnakumari Kanesan, Gerald Bodey

From the The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

Address reprint requests to Linda Elting, DrPH, Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Box 40, Houston, TX 77030; email lelting{at}mdanderson.org

PURPOSE: To determine whether antibiotic regimens with similar rates of response differ significantly in the speed of response and to estimate the impact of this difference on the cost of febrile neutropenia.

METHODS: The time point of clinical response was defined by comparing the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of alternative objective and subjective definitions. Data from 488 episodes of febrile neutropenia, treated with either of two commonly used antibiotics (coded A or B) during six clinical trials, were pooled to compare the median time to clinical response, days of antibiotic therapy and hospitalization, and estimated costs.

RESULTS: Response rates were similar; however, the median time to clinical response was significantly shorter with A-based regimens (5 days) compared with B-based regimens (7 days; P = .003). After 72 hours of therapy, 33% of patients who received A but only 18% of those who received B had responded (P = .01). These differences resulted in fewer days of antibiotic therapy and hospitalization with A-based regimens (7 and 9 days) compared with B-based regimens (9 and 12 days, respectively; P < .04) and in significantly lower estimated median costs ($8,491 v $11,133 per episode; P = .03). Early discharge at the time of clinical response should reduce the median cost from $10,752 to $8,162 (P < .001).

CONCLUSION: Despite virtually identical rates of response, time to clinical response and estimated cost of care varied significantly among regimens. An early discharge strategy based on our definition of the time point of clinical response may further reduce the cost of treating non–low-risk patients with febrile neutropenia.

Presented in part at the Second International Febrile Neutropenia Meeting, Brussels, Belgium, December 14-16, 1995, and the Annual Meeting of the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer, St Galen, Switzerland, February 26 through March 1, 1997.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
L. S. Elting, C. Lu, C. P. Escalante, S. H. Giordano, J. C. Trent, C. Cooksley, E. B.C. Avritscher, Y.-C. T. Shih, J. Ensor, B. N. Bekele, et al.
Outcomes and Cost of Outpatient or Inpatient Management of 712 Patients With Febrile Neutropenia
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2008; 26(4): 606 - 611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. Paul, A. Fraser, and L. Leibovici
Empirical antibiotic monotherapy for febrile neutropenia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: authors' response
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 2006; 58(2): 479 - 480.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. E. Peacock Jr., D. A. Herrington, J. C. Wade, H. M. Lazarus, M. D. Reed, J. W. Sinclair, D. C. Haverstock, S. F. Kowalsky, D. D. Hurd, D. A. Cushing, et al.
Ciprofloxacin plus Piperacillin Compared with Tobramycin plus Piperacillin as Empirical Therapy in Febrile Neutropenic Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial
Ann Intern Med, July 16, 2002; 137(2): 77 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ASH Education BookHome page
G. R. Donowitz, D. G. Maki, C. J. Crnich, P. G. Pappas, and K. V.I. Rolston
Infections in the Neutropenic Patient-- New Views of an Old Problem
Hematology, January 1, 2001; 2001(1): 113 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online