Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Obedian, E.
Right arrow Articles by Haffty, B. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Obedian, E.
Right arrow Articles by Haffty, B. G.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 18, Issue 12 (June), 2000: 2406-2412
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Oncology

Second Malignancies After Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Lumpectomy and Radiation Therapy Versus Mastectomy

By Edward Obedian, Diana B. Fischer, Bruce G. Haffty

From the Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

Address reprint requests to Bruce G. Haffty, MD, Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, PO Box 208040, New Haven, CT 06520-8040; email bruce.haffty{at}yale.edu

PURPOSE: To determine the risk of second malignancies after lumpectomy and radiation therapy (LRT), and to compare it with that in a similar cohort of early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy without radiation (MAST).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1970 and December 1990, 1,029 breast cancer patients at our institution underwent LRT. A cohort of 1,387 breast cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment by mastectomy (MAST), and who did not receive postoperative radiation during the same time period, served as a comparison group. Second malignancies were categorized as contralateral breast versus nonbreast. In the cohort of patients undergoing LRT, a detailed analysis was carried out with respect to age, disease stage, smoking history, radiation therapy technique, dose, the use of chemotherapy or hormone therapy, and other clinical and/or pathologic characteristics.

RESULTS: As of March 1999, the median follow-up was 14.6 years for the LRT group and 16 years for the MAST group. The 15-year risk of any second malignancy was nearly identical for both cohorts (17.5% v 19%, respectively). The second breast malignancy rate at 15 years was 10% for both the MAST and LRT groups. The 15-year risk of a second nonbreast malignancy was 11% for the LRT and 10% for the MAST group. In the subset of patients 45 years of age or younger at the time of treatment, the second breast and nonbreast malignancy rates at 15 years were 10% and 5% for patients undergoing LRT versus 7% and 4% for patients undergoing mastectomy (P, not statistically significant). In the detailed analysis of LRT patients, second lung malignancies were associated with a history of tobacco use. There were fewer contralateral breast tumors in patients undergoing adjuvant hormone therapy, although this did not reach statistical significance. The adjuvant use of chemotherapy did not significantly affect the risk of second malignancies.

CONCLUSION: There seems to be no increased risk of second malignancies in patients undergoing LRT using modern techniques, compared with MAST. Continued monitoring of these patient cohorts will be required in order to document that these findings are maintained with even longer follow-up periods. With nearly 15 years median follow-up periods, however, these data should be reassuring to women who are considering LRT as a treatment option.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICVTSHome page
J. Furak, I. Trojan, T. Szoke, A. Wolfard, E. Nagy, I. Nemeth, L. Tiszlavicz, and G. Lazar
Lung cancer as a second primary malignant tumor: prognostic values after surgical resection
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, February 1, 2008; 7(1): 50 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Min Park, M. Kyung Lim, K. Won Jung, S. Ae Shin, K.-Y. Yoo, Y. Ho Yun, and B. Yul Huh
Prediagnosis Smoking, Obesity, Insulin Resistance, and Second Primary Cancer Risk in Male Cancer Survivors: National Health Insurance Corporation Study
J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2007; 25(30): 4835 - 4843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
D. W. Arthur, L. W. Cuttino, A. C. Neuschatz, D. T. Koo, M. M. Morris, H. D. Bear, B. J. Kaplan, K. Dawson, and D. E. Wazer
Tumor Bed Boost Omission After Negative Re-Excision in Breast-Conservation Treatment
Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2006; 13(6): 794 - 801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
H. M. Nielsen, M. Overgaard, C. Grau, A. R. Jensen, and J. Overgaard
Study of Failure Pattern Among High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients With or Without Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in Addition to Adjuvant Systemic Therapy: Long-Term Results From the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group DBCG 82 b and c Randomized Studies
J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2006; 24(15): 2268 - 2275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
E. R. Gritz, C. Dresler, and L. Sarna
Smoking, The Missing Drug Interaction in Clinical Trials: Ignoring the Obvious
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2005; 14(10): 2287 - 2293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group
Second Primary Cancers After Enrollment in the COMS Trials for Treatment of Choroidal Melanoma: COMS Report No. 25
Arch Ophthalmol, May 1, 2005; 123(5): 601 - 604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. E. Smith, J. Bryant, A. DeCillis, and S. Anderson
Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome After Doxorubicin-Cyclophosphamide Adjuvant Therapy for Operable Breast Cancer: The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Experience
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2003; 21(7): 1195 - 1204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. Fisher, S. Anderson, J. Bryant, R. G. Margolese, M. Deutsch, E. R. Fisher, J.-H. Jeong, and N. Wolmark
Twenty-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy, Lumpectomy, and Lumpectomy plus Irradiation for the Treatment of Invasive Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., October 17, 2002; 347(16): 1233 - 1241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. K. McDonnell, D. J. Schaid, J. L. Myers, C. S. Grant, J. H. Donohue, J. E. Woods, M. H. Frost, J. L. Johnson, D. L. Sitta, J. M. Slezak, et al.
Efficacy of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Women With a Personal and Family History of Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2001; 19(19): 3938 - 3943.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. N. Peshkin, T. A. DeMarco, B. M. Brogan, C. Lerman, and C. Isaacs
BRCA1/2 Testing: Complex Themes in Result Interpretation
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2001; 19(9): 2555 - 2565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. Unnithian, R. Macklis, and B. G. Haffty
Breast Cancer Radiotherapy: Safe for All?
J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2000; 18(23): 4000 - 4001.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online