Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 17, Issue 10
(October), 1999: 3033-3037
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Combination Versus Sequential Doxorubicin and Docetaxel as Primary Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Randomized Pilot Trial of the Hoosier Oncology Group
Kathy D. Miller,
Worta McCaskill-Stevens,
Judy Sisk,
David M. Loesch,
Frank Monaco,
Roopa Seshadri,
George W. Sledge, Jr
From the Hoosier Oncology Group and the Walther Cancer Institute, Indianapolis, IN.
Address reprint requests to Kathy D. Miller, MD, 3202 N Meridian St, Indianapolis, IN 46202-4646; email kathmill{at}iupui.edu
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of combination and sequential dose-dense chemotherapy with doxorubicin and docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Collegeville, PA) as primary chemotherapy of breast cancer.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed stage II or noninflammatory stage III breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive the same total doses of doxorubicin and docetaxel over a 12-week period before definitive surgery. Patients in arm A received sequential therapy with doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 every 2 weeks for three cycles followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 2 weeks for three cycles. Patients in arm B received combination therapy with doxorubicin 56 mg/m2 plus docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for four cycles. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was administered on days 2 to 12 of each cycle in both groups.
RESULTS: Forty patients were entered onto the trial. Pretreatment tumor size averaged 5.7 cm with clinicallypositive axillary lymph nodes in 23 patients (57%). As expected, myelosuppression was severe in both groups; however, 80% of planned dose-intensity was delivered. Hand-foot syndrome was more common after sequential therapy. Clinical responses were similar in both groups, with an overall response rate of 87%, including 20% clinical complete remissions. Pathologic complete remission or residual in situ disease only was confirmed in five patients (12.8%). Patients who received sequential therapy had fewer positive lymph nodes (mean, 2.17 v 4.81; P < .037) at definitive surgery.
CONCLUSION: Primary chemotherapy with doxorubicin and docetaxel is well tolerated and highly active. A sequential treatment schedule increases toxicity but may result in more substantial lymph node clearance than combination therapy.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Puhalla, E. Mrozek, D. Young, S. Ottman, A. McVey, K. Kendra, N. J. Merriman, M. Knapp, T. Patel, M. E. Thompson, et al.
Randomized Phase II Adjuvant Trial of Dose-Dense Docetaxel Before or After Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide in Axillary Node-Positive Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 1, 2008;
26(10):
1691 - 1697.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C Natoli, E Cianchetti, N Tinari, D Angelucci, A Grassadonia, M Zilli, C Ficorella, E Ricevuto, S Grossi, M De Tursi, et al.
A phase II study of dose-dense epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel plus capecitabine and pegfilgrastim support as preoperative therapy for patients with stage II, IIIA breast cancer
Ann. Onc.,
June 1, 2007;
18(6):
1015 - 1020.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P Piedbois, D Serin, F Priou, P Laplaige, S Greget, E Angellier, E Teissier, J-F Berdah, M Fabbro, B Valenza, et al.
Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer: docetaxel followed by epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (T/EC), or the reverse sequence (EC/T), every 2 weeks, versus docetaxel, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (TEC) every 3 weeks. AERO B03 randomized phase II study
Ann. Onc.,
January 1, 2007;
18(1):
52 - 57.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. J. Gradishar, S. B. Wedam, M. Jahanzeb, J. Erban, S. A. Limentani, K.-T. Tsai, S. R. Olsen, and S. M. Swain
Neoadjuvant docetaxel followed by adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in patients with stage III breast cancer
Ann. Onc.,
August 1, 2005;
16(8):
1297 - 1304.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T.R. J. Evans, A. Yellowlees, E. Foster, H. Earl, D. A. Cameron, A. W. Hutcheon, R. E. Coleman, T. Perren, C. J. Gallagher, M. Quigley, et al.
Phase III Randomized Trial of Doxorubicin and Docetaxel Versus Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide As Primary Medical Therapy in Women With Breast Cancer: An Anglo-Celtic Cooperative Oncology Group Study
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 1, 2005;
23(13):
2988 - 2995.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Hamilton and G. Hortobagyi
Chemotherapy: What Progress in the Last 5 Years?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 10, 2005;
23(8):
1760 - 1775.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Schwartz, S. M. Domchek, W.-T. Hwang, and K. Fox
Evaluation of anemia, neutropenia and skin toxicities in standard or dose-dense doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC)-paclitaxel or docetaxel adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
Ann. Onc.,
February 1, 2005;
16(2):
247 - 252.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S. Mano and A. Awada
Primary chemotherapy for breast cancer: the evidence and the future
Ann. Onc.,
August 1, 2004;
15(8):
1161 - 1171.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Alba, M. Martin, M. Ramos, E. Adrover, A. Balil, C. Jara, A. Barnadas, A. Fernandez-Aramburo, P. Sanchez-Rovira, M. Amenedo, et al.
Multicenter Randomized Trial Comparing Sequential With Concomitant Administration of Doxorubicin and Docetaxel As First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM-9903) Phase III Study
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 1, 2004;
22(13):
2587 - 2593.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. G. Estevez and W. J. Gradishar
Evidence-Based Use of Neoadjuvant Taxane in Operable and Inoperable Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res.,
May 15, 2004;
10(10):
3249 - 3261.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Cresta, G. Grasselli, M. Mansutti, A. Martoni, G. Lelli, G. Capri, F. Buzzi, G. Robustelli Della Cuna, A. Jirillo, E. Terzoli, et al.
A randomized phase II study of combination, alternating and sequential regimens of doxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer
Ann. Onc.,
March 1, 2004;
15(3):
433 - 439.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. W. Sledge Jr
Preoperative Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Lessons Learned and Future Prospects
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 15, 2003;
21(24):
4481 - 4482.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Gilbar
Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice,
December 1, 2003;
9(4):
137 - 150.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. D. Bear, S. Anderson, A. Brown, R. Smith, E. P. Mamounas, B. Fisher, R. Margolese, H. Theoret, A. Soran, D. L. Wickerham, et al.
The Effect on Tumor Response of Adding Sequential Preoperative Docetaxel to Preoperative Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide: Preliminary Results From National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 15, 2003;
21(22):
4165 - 4174.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Ganem, M. Tubiana-Hulin, P. Fumoleau, M. Combe, J.-L. Misset, J.-M. Vannetzel, T. Bachelot, L. R. De Ybarlucea, V. Lotz, B. Bendahmane, et al.
Phase II trial combining docetaxel and doxorubicin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer
Ann. Onc.,
November 1, 2003;
14(11):
1623 - 1628.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Gogas and G. Fountzilas
The role of taxanes as a component of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer
Ann. Onc.,
May 1, 2003;
14(5):
667 - 674.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. G. Estevez, J. M. Cuevas, A. Anton, J. Florian, J. M. Lopez-Vega, A. Velasco, F. Lobo, A. Herrero, and J. Fortes
Weekly Docetaxel as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II and III Breast Cancer: Efficacy and Correlation with Biological Markers in a Phase II, Multicenter Study
Clin. Cancer Res.,
February 1, 2003;
9(2):
686 - 692.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. C. Smith, S. D. Heys, A. W. Hutcheon, I. D. Miller, S. Payne, F. J. Gilbert, A. K. Ah-See, O. Eremin, L. G. Walker, T. K. Sarkar, et al.
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Significantly Enhanced Response With Docetaxel
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 15, 2002;
20(6):
1456 - 1466.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S. Aapro
Adjuvant Therapy of Primary Breast Cancer: A Review of Key Findings from the 7th International Conference, St. Gallen, February 2001
Oncologist,
August 1, 2001;
6(4):
376 - 385.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S. Aapro
Neoadjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer: Can We Define Its Role?
Oncologist,
June 1, 2001;
6(2008):
36 - 39.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Fountzilas, C. Papadimitriou, U. Dafni, D. Bafaloukos, D. Skarlos, L. A. Moulopoulos, E. Razis, H. P. Kalofonos, G. Aravantinos, E. Briassoulis, et al.
Dose-Dense Sequential Chemotherapy With Epirubicin and Paclitaxel Versus the Combination, as First-Line Chemotherapy, in Advanced Breast Cancer: A Randomized Study Conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 15, 2001;
19(8):
2232 - 2239.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|